| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 652.1 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | A disgrace to the forces of evil | Tue Feb 24 1987 07:12 | 6 |
| I disagree. While it's by no means a *great* disc, I don't find
it objectionable at all. I'll admit that my liking of the material
outweighs any production problems, but I still didn't notice any
really poor mastering.
--- jerry
|
| 652.2 | Once may not be enough. | PUGET::WARREN | | Tue Feb 24 1987 10:20 | 7 |
| Jerry,
Maybe I just didn't like the Rascals as much as I thought I did.
I'll give it another listen tonight, and will be more specific in
the next note.
tom
|
| 652.3 | | MASTER::RDONAHUE | | Tue Feb 24 1987 11:21 | 2 |
| I didn't find the disc objectionable. I did read in Goldmine that at
least one track was mastered from a record instead of master tape.
|
| 652.4 | | BPOV09::DANEK | | Thu Feb 26 1987 07:54 | 12 |
| Reply to < Note 652.3 by MASTER::RDONAHUE >
>
> I didn't find the disc objectionable. I did read in Goldmine that at
least one track was mastered from a record instead of master tape.
...that's probably why I thought I heard clicks and pops on one cut! I really
liked the Rascal's music. I didn't think it was all that bad...but I have
heard better re-releases of old music. A choice of not getting the disc
because of quality versus not having the music at all...I'll get the disc,
without hesitation.
Dick
|
| 652.5 | Ok, I'll meet you half way | PUGET::WARREN | | Thu Feb 26 1987 10:14 | 11 |
| Well,
I guess Dick said it better in .4. I listened to the disc again
last night and it's primarily the first 4 or 5 cuts that sound bad
to me. ( Good Lovin not included ) . The rest are OK to decent.
The reason I bought the disk was that I wanted the music and was
willing to take a chance on the quality, I just wasn't as pleased
as I have been with the rest of the disks I have.
tom who gets his Beatles disks at 17:00 today
|