| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 675.1 |  | MSE1::PCOTE | Just say yes to 'thin clients' | Thu Mar 06 1997 11:52 | 10 | 
|  | 
> 1) dual-redundant HSZ50.
     Yes, it's supported.
2) KZPBA (KZPSA replacment)
     Not yet. It's being qualified I believe by StorageWorks
     engineering.
 | 
| 675.2 | requirement for V3.0 on HSZ40 ?? | FIREBL::LEEDS | From VAXinated to Alphaholic | Mon Mar 10 1997 15:27 | 10 | 
|  | Just as a follw-up question - 
In order to support dual/redundant HSZ40s (not 50s), do the 40s need to be 
running HSOF V3.0Z ??   I have a customer with HSZ40s at V2.7, and they want 
to know if they have to upgrade to V3.0 of the HSZ firmware before they 
change to dual/redundant HSZs.
Thanks
Arlan
 | 
| 675.3 | yes | SWETSC::NORDBERG | Con Brio | Mon Mar 10 1997 15:32 | 5 | 
|  |     Yes, your customer needs to upgrade to 3.0-x to meet the supported
    cluster requirements..
    
    //AndersN
    
 |