| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 600.1 |  | GUIDUK::HEALY | Alan Healy @ZSO | Mon Feb 10 1997 21:14 | 14 | 
|  |     I can't answer whether it will be officially supported.  But due to the
    complexity of replication and the fact that it was designed without
    clusters in mind, I wouldn't expect it to work, except under very
    limited conditions. 
    
    Replication actually involves 4 databases: the Publishing database, the
    Subscribing database, the Distribution database, and the 'msdb'
    (scheduling) database.  All of these have to be in sync for replication
    to work correctly.
    
    Maybe if I can get a test cluster set up I will try it...
    
    	Al
    
 | 
| 600.2 | Cluster with replication | NETRIX::"[email protected]" | David Liu | Wed Feb 12 1997 04:42 | 14 | 
|  | I have tried to set up the Replication on NT Cluster 1.0SP1 , but I have got a
Error Message: 
"Error 15378: [SQL Server] No Server may list more than one fallback server in
its own sysservers table. Aborting this procedure" 
When I select "Intall Replication Publishing" from SQL Enterprise Manager.
Anyone have idea about that?
Thanks!
David Liu
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
 | 
| 600.3 | ??? | GUIDUK::HEALY | Alan Healy @ZSO | Thu Feb 13 1997 12:27 | 11 | 
|  |     I'm surprised that Replication would try to install a fallback server.
    Were you defining a Remote Distributor? Entries are needed in
    sysservers for any other servers that may need to log in to this
    server, such as a Remote Distributor.  However, I wouldn't think they
    would be Fallback Servers.  If you were setting up a Remote
    Distributor, was it the other clsuter server?
    
    Clusters sets the 'rpc' and 'fallback' bits in the server status field
    in sysservers.  I wonder if replication is getting confused by this.
    
    	Al
 | 
| 600.4 | Possible SQL Bug... | GUIDUK::HEALY | Alan Healy @ZSO | Thu Feb 13 1997 13:54 | 5 | 
|  |     Well, I looked at some of the system stored procedures used in
    replication and found what I *think* is a bug in SQL server
    which I have forwarded to the engineers.
    
    	Al
 | 
| 600.5 | Software Specialists | NETRIX::"[email protected]" | David Liu | Mon Feb 17 1997 02:22 | 8 | 
|  | Please forward me the info if you get response from the Engineer.
Thanks a lot.
Best Regards,
David Liu
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
 | 
| 600.6 |  | NETRIX::"[email protected]" | David Liu | Mon Feb 17 1997 02:25 | 8 | 
|  | >Clusters sets the 'rpc' and 'fallback' bits in the server status field
>in sysservers.  I wonder if replication is getting confused by this.
It looks like replication is checking the sysservers table during the 
installation of the distribution service.
Best Regards,
David Liu
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
 |