| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1130.1 | What about 9 hole courses? | BTOQA::SHANE | | Mon Jan 14 1991 12:59 | 8 |
|
But the course I belong to only has 9 holes!!!!!!!
Can you make an exception for this?
Shane
|
| 1130.2 | It's a looooong time till DEC 1st ;) | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Mon Jan 14 1991 13:09 | 15 |
| Hi Shane,
I too am a member at a 9 hole course ... It wouldn't be fair
to the others if we entered an 18 hole round. All the information
gained playing the first nine would definitely make the 2nd nine
easier. Compared to someone playing 18 different holes we would
have an unfair advantage.
Being that the tourny will last until Dec 1st, it'll give both of us
ample time to play many 18 hole courses to compensate ;) !! Did you
hear that Eunhwa? I said "Many" 18 hole courses :)))) !
Walta
|
| 1130.3 | OH...REALLY...???? | CSS::GORDON | | Mon Jan 14 1991 13:40 | 12 |
| } All the information
} gained playing the first nine would definitely make the 2nd nine
} easier.
I bet that statistics show this not to be true...in fact I
suspect that those of us(I also play a nine hole course) who are members
at nine hole courses and play with regular groups could possible even
attest to the fact that the opposite is true...
|
| 1130.4 | clarafication.... | CSS::GORDON | | Mon Jan 14 1991 13:43 | 4 |
| I do however agree that the scores should be over a 18 hole course...
my last reply was only an observation and was not meant to agree with
.3 for the tourney...
|
| 1130.5 | +'s and -'s | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Mon Jan 14 1991 14:15 | 29 |
|
reply .3
Discussing 9 holes twice, versus 18 in ease of play. I understand
how you may feel it's arguable that 9 holes twice is more difficult...
a couple of other things can go wrong ; such as
-'s
previous bad results inducing fear of failure
lack of concentration (becoming lethargic)
even though, the +'s far outway the -'s ;
knowing what club to hit
knowing where to hit (whether the ball will hold or
release)
Knowing from the fairway which part of the green to hit,
to stay low of the hole.
Knowing the speed of each green, for putting and pitch
and rolls.
I find if I can fight the tendancy to remember my failures, and
stay allert... the back nine will almost always play easier.
JMHO
Walta
|
| 1130.6 | sounds like a good tourney... | CSS::GORDON | | Mon Jan 14 1991 14:26 | 6 |
| but walta....all this is easier said than done as I'm sure you've
also experienced...
;^)
dick
|
| 1130.7 | Got me there ;) | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Mon Jan 14 1991 14:33 | 4 |
|
Very true Dick ;))))
Walta
|
| 1130.8 | {my two cents worth} | BOSOX::WEWING | | Mon Jan 14 1991 14:59 | 12 |
| what next? if i play the same 18 holes twice in one day have
i gained a big advantage the second time around.
we could get real extreme and say you can't play the same course
twice in a certain time frame.
being a hacker, i see no 'usable' advantage to playing the same 9
over again. the pros would likely gain an advantage but hackers
wouldn't.
Willie Ewing
|
| 1130.9 | 9 x 1 = 9; 9 x 2 = 18... | ASABET::VARLEY | | Mon Jan 14 1991 15:35 | 10 |
| Walta, I'll muddy the water a bit and say "what about playing a 9 hole
course from 2 different sets of tees ?" Truthfully, I agree with you.
Perhaps there might be a separate category for the 9 holes twice folks
to resolve this. In any case, the 9 holers should have to play
different tees on the back 9 or they'll only be seeing 9 different
holes for the event - not 18.
It doesn't matter to me, because on the course I hang my hat on, I'm
no threat anyway !
--Jack
|
| 1130.10 | let's vote on it | MAST::LENEHAN | | Mon Jan 14 1991 16:19 | 11 |
| Hi Wally,
I have a suggestion. Since majority of the replies think that they
won't benefit from playing 9-holes twice and only the good players
may benefit from it, why not allow two 9-holes scores in the net
catagory? And, restrict the gross catagory to 18-holes scores.
I wouldn't want to mix the tees either because for women or
novice men playing from the white or the blue tees could make a big
difference.
Eunhwa
|
| 1130.11 | California RULES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | RAYBOK::COOPER | One-ton Tomato ! | Mon Jan 14 1991 20:02 | 6 |
| As a side issue, I predict that once again the golf league
that plays out of Santa Clara, Cal. will once again sweep the
standings! 8^)
Mad Hacker
|
| 1130.12 | 9 holes x 2 = OK | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Tue Jan 15 1991 08:29 | 21 |
|
Hi Y'all ,
I think Jacks idea is a good one... I see no reason why we can't
add another category for "9 holes x 2" , just make sure you hit from
a different set of tee's.
The idea behind the tourny is to make it easy enough that everyone
can compete... the more the merrier. Being that we're playing against
the course, you can even play a par 3 course.
the exceptions being - miniature golf, and chip and putts, indoor
golf
and no video games !
So if during this year you are out playing and just happen to get
hot , the round won't be wasted enter it here and you may win !
Walta
|
| 1130.13 | Still out | BTOQA::SHANE | | Tue Jan 15 1991 09:43 | 13 |
|
Well using different tees on a 9 hole course still leaves me out.
The course is new, and the owner puts all efforts and money into
the construction of the back 9. The tee boxes sometimes are so
bad it can be the hardest shot of the round, and he only puts out
one set of tees for hte men. He won't be putting out the blue
tees until after the course is done.
Oh well, maybe next year.
Shane
|
| 1130.14 | Cimarron Hills - Colorado Springs | COMET::DVORAK | | Tue Jan 15 1991 11:01 | 6 |
| We have a 9 hole course that has two sets of tees for playing 18 holes.
There are 2 holes on each green and players rotate the pin between the
holes. What may have been a par 5, the 1st time around could be 4 the
2nd time around. A short par 4 could be a longer par 4 etc - etc. As
for putting, the pin may be in the the same hole for 1 or 2 holes but
wouldn't be for all of the last nine holes.
|
| 1130.15 | my .02 | NSG018::STOPERA | | Tue Jan 15 1991 11:45 | 10 |
| I sitting here wondering why anytime someone wants to run a tourny in
here and states the rules of the tourny that there is always someone
that wants to change things. My opinion is that is you don't like the
format, then don't enter. It is very very difficult just to run a
tourny let alone trying to please everyone else. So please if you don't
like the rules, form your own tourny and state your own rules.
peter
|
| 1130.16 | Golfers are like that I guess | BTOQA::SHANE | | Tue Jan 15 1991 12:44 | 5 |
|
re: -1
A typical golfer response!
|
| 1130.17 | K.I.S.S. "Keep It Simple Stupid" | BUSY::SWANEY | | Tue Jan 15 1991 12:49 | 7 |
|
<RE:.15
I agree... I to play a nine hole league But I should be able find the
time to manage 18 holes somewhere between now and NOVEMBER...
Bill
|
| 1130.18 | More chat | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Tue Jan 15 1991 13:31 | 16 |
|
Hi Pete,
When I first read how some people were feeling lefft out if
they couldn't play 9 twice, I felt the same way... thinking
geeesh, you have until Nov 30th .
But then I know a lot of members of 9 hole courses that spend
almost the entire season playing their course... they shouldn't
be left out. However I still think there's an advantage to
playing nine twice. So Jacks idea of making an additional
category will solve the problem.
It sure is interesting running a tourny though :) !
Walta
|
| 1130.19 | For the record | BTOQA::SHANE | | Tue Jan 15 1991 14:36 | 20 |
|
Walta,
I'd like to go on record as saying that I did not intend on causing
a big hassel!
I thought I started out with a very simple question, "What about those
of us......"
I'm not a very good golfer in the first place, just thought it would be
fun to get involved, but not at the expense of having to put someone
to additional, un-planned work.
So thanks any way,
Shane
|
| 1130.20 | Is it really as simple as it sounds? | SONATA::BBONNER | | Tue Jan 15 1991 15:21 | 12 |
| Walta,
To keep this simple, it sounds like you will be ignoring course and/or
slope ratings. But, I do have two other rule questions.
1.) Should scores be attested by a fellow Deccie?
2.) Are only USGA handicaps to be used in determining net scores?
I assume this is a strict honor system which everyone pledges to abide
by. ;-> Oh, yes - should we keep the score card for verification of
the "posted" scores?
Barry
|
| 1130.21 | ... | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | loose cannon | Tue Jan 15 1991 15:25 | 1 |
| And you got to play the ball down:-)
|
| 1130.22 | Piece a cake | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Tue Jan 15 1991 15:41 | 24 |
|
HI Shane,
Everyone who wants to enter is qualified... there will not be
any rule that will eliminate a golfer from competing. It's OK
that you voiced your concerns, usually tourny's are run with
strict rules but this isn't one of them. I was surprised that
the initial rules didn't cover everyone, but they didn't, so
with no additional hassles we can simply allow another
category of 9 x2 . There will definitely be a bunch of golfers
(including Moi) that will post both an 18 hole score and a 9 x2.
So , in your case... since you don't have multi tee locations
on your course. Tee off at the tee's the first time around,
then step off ten paces closer/farther away from the tee boxes
the 2nd 9. That will be fine.
No problem;
thanks Walta
|
| 1130.23 | Anwers to rules ?'s | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Tue Jan 15 1991 15:59 | 37 |
|
Hi Barry,
Good questions -
To answer your questions and others;
1. Do we need the scores attested?
- No. We are working on the honor system.
2. USGA handicaps?
- Any handicap is welcomed. If you don't have a handicap,
try to get some help in getting one. Find a golf league
representative, and use their method. It will be your
responsibility to keep the handicap up to date.
If you have a league handicap for 9 holes, simply double
it for your 18 hole scores.
3. Play the ball down?
- This will vary. Play by the local rules for the course at
that time. Sometimes at Monoosnock we play preferred lies
of 6" sometimes 1 club. Some courses are soooo nice
(Green Meadows) that they always? play them down.
4. Score cards for verification?
- No. Just reply to this note.
thanks Walta
|
| 1130.24 | thank you | BTOQA::SHANE | | Wed Jan 16 1991 09:54 | 8 |
|
Walta,
Thank you, I am looking forward to it, and will make every effort
to change the 1st/2nd 9 how ever possible.
Shane
|
| 1130.25 | Prize category's are | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Wed Jan 16 1991 11:05 | 32 |
|
HI everyone,
Just to cover all the bases... and to give some additional purpose
to your "after" work 9 hole rounds. I am adding a "best 9"
category. Just make sure you putt out, no gimme's ... this may
not be possible in some league match's where your opponent can
force you to pick up. In that case you won't be able to use
that score.
So the prize category's are;
Mens/Womens
Best 18 Gross
Best 18 Net
Best 9x2 Gross
Best 9x2 Net
Best 9 Gross
Best 9 Net
That'll do it... and for prizes, lets see.... with my savings,
.... and a baby on the way.... Hmmm?? how about a
congratulations for each winner ! :)
Naaah, I'll come up with something !
thanks Walta
|
| 1130.26 | How course rating and slope figure into net score | BROKE::PAL | Paul Lemaire | Wed Jan 16 1991 14:38 | 29 |
| RE: <<< Note 1130.20 by SONATA::BBONNER >>>
-< Is it really as simple as it sounds? >-
>>> To keep this simple, it sounds like you will be ignoring course and/or
>>> slope ratings. But, I do have two other rule questions.
If you have a USGA handicap, you should look up the equivalent handicap
on a chart posted at the course(s) you play and you this to determine
your net score. For instance, my USGA Handicap Index is 24.6
At Amherst (NH) Country Club, my home course, this converts to a 26.
This conversion takes the slope and rating into consideration.
When I play at my father's home course, Montaup Country Club in
Portsmouth, RI which has a higher rating and slope, my handicap
goes up several stokes.
If you have a league handicap, only, but you always play at the same
course, you could use the same table to estimate your USGA handicap
index. A typical table might look like this:
Hcp Index Handicap
.
.
23.8 - 24.7 26
24.8 - 25.7 27
25.8 - 26.8 28
.
.
Thus, if your league handicap is 26 at this course, you could estimate
your USGA handicap index to be halfway between 23.8 and 24.7, say 24.3
|
| 1130.27 | Explanation required | EAYV01::MILLIGAN | I Don't care about apathy | Thu Jan 17 1991 04:15 | 23 |
| Hi,
This sounds like a great fun idea for the year,but out of interest
(mainly mine) I was surprised to see the volume of responses referring
to the 9 hole issue.The reason being that here in Scotland 9 hole
courses are rare and would really only be used by people learning
the game.
As i have never been lucky enough to play golf in the US,can someone
verify that there is such a high percentage of 9 hole and possibly,
if this is true,what the history is behind this situation.
i.e. Is it just lack of space ?
It is also a mystery to me how the US handicapping system works
in so much as it can vary depending on the course difficulty.
In my country your handicap is constant ,regardless of the course.
How does "slope" work ??
Would it be OK therefore for people this side of the pond to
participate in this tournament.
hope you can help
ken
|
| 1130.28 | World Invitation ! | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Thu Jan 17 1991 08:32 | 18 |
|
Hi Ken
Would it be OK for other country's to participate ???
That's the intent ... I'd love for the entire DEC World of
golfers to participate. Last year we had entries from all
over the World.
When it comes to calculating your NET scores, use whatever method
you have been using in your country.
Be sure to tell other DEC golfers in your area about the tourny ;)
thanks Walta
|
| 1130.29 | {number of 9 hole courses?} | BOSOX::WEWING | | Thu Jan 17 1991 09:46 | 5 |
| re. the question about how many nine hole courses are there?
a list of public courses in massachusetts published in the
boston globe last year shows 40% of the courses are 9 holes.
hack nicklaus
|
| 1130.30 | Some 9-hole reasons | RAYBOK::COOPER | One-ton Tomato ! | Thu Jan 17 1991 11:20 | 12 |
| In reply to the question about 9-hole courses, We do have many 9
hole courses. There are several reasons for this, available land
within a city and expense of building a course are the main ones.
In my area, several of the courses that are 18 holes, began as 9
hole layouts. As golf grew in popularity these courses were expanded
to 18 holes. Most new courses here are being built as 18's now.
I guess that going around the course twice doesn't seem like much
of an inconvenience. Maybe a 6 hole course would be fun !!!! Three
laps around the Maypole.
How about it Jack, why did the Fox start out as a 9 ?
Mad Hacker
|
| 1130.31 | Better hurry it's 46 degrees | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Thu Jan 17 1991 11:56 | 17 |
| reply .11
Madness,
May I remind you that Massachusetetetettztss holds the current
1st place slot from last season.. although California came in a
real CLOSE 2nd !!!
I predict Mass. will defend the 1st place slot, even though
we're allowing you guys/gals on the west coast a little jump on
things by starting the tourny while we're still covered in snow ;)
All you warm weather areas better take full advantage !!! Cause
once the snow melts... scores will be coming in from Mass !
All in the spirit of good competition of course,
Walta
|
| 1130.32 | | ASABET::VARLEY | | Mon Jan 21 1991 09:36 | 8 |
| The Fox started (and stayed) a 9 holer through several sets of owners
due to what I call "shellout falter"), i.e. reluctance or inability to
spend money. Fortunately our new owner (Bill Sandri) has a lot of it,
and wanted to go first class. Therefore, he hired the original
architect (Roger Rulewich of Robert Trent Jones) to do the new 9. So
far, so good...
--Jack
|
| 1130.33 | seasonal adj ? | SONATA::FEENEY | non golfers live half a life | Mon Jan 21 1991 12:05 | 8 |
| Seems to me that the players on the west coast have a distinct
advantage in that they can play all year round. Maybe it would be
fairer if we handicapped areas of the world similar to the USGA slope
system and therefore the Northeast would get a higher degree of
dificulty rate and a higher handicap for the tourney but then again
maybe a rest is helpful. Also I'm sure players outside of the Northeast
,Central and other short golf seasons have no sympathy for us so we'll
have to be better.
|
| 1130.34 | hammer time | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Mon Jan 21 1991 13:02 | 17 |
|
Reply -1
Hi Phil,
Very funny ! A seasonal handicap due to % of play time
during a year!! :))))) Very good... And Don't go telling me you
meant it !!?? I know you Phil. Anything to stir up the opponents ;)
I kinda think the winter layoff helps.... my golf game
looks better and less I play, so by the time 1991 starts I have
such a confident attitude. When I play everyday, I feel terrible!
It's like banging your head with a hammer so when you stop it
feels so good.
Walta
|
| 1130.35 | Short Season again | SONATA::FEENEY | non golfers live half a life | Tue Jan 22 1991 08:57 | 11 |
| Walta, the hammer routine is a good analogy for how I view playing too
much for myself but I wonder what it would be like to play all year
round? Do the people on the West Coast lay off a bit and find their
game improves or does it matter? Seems to me that golf is a game which
you need to continue to learn to improve with lot's experience.
Alas, I did'nt stir the pot enough- well let's see what happens in
the tourney. I'd like to see New England win again despite the short
season.
Regards Phil
|
| 1130.36 | Year-round thoughts | RAYBOK::COOPER | One-ton Tomato ! | Tue Jan 22 1991 19:29 | 12 |
| re. last 2
As a practicioner of the year round schedule I have found that
the occaisional two week layoff when things are going bad can help.
Also we will get weather patterns that will keep us off the course
for two or three weeks. It is hard to go more than two weeks though
for me, I get irritable and my significant other tells me to go out
and play no matter what the conditions. I can't imagine not being
able to play for 3-4 months at a time !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As far as handicapping for those with limited playing time ? HAH !!
That is your curse to live with.
Mad Hacker
|
| 1130.37 | One for Opener's | CHEFS::NEWPORTP | | Wed Jan 23 1991 08:59 | 25 |
| I was reading the opening entry of this topic and noticed that Walta
had asked scores to be posted right here. So far there aren't any. Well
I thought someone has to make the first move, so for fear of disrupting
a really interesting debate on 6,9,18 holes, same or different tees,
West or East coast dominance, here's a starter....
Nine holes played on Sat 19th Jan ..Windlemere Golf Club, Surrey, UK
Phil Newport (Reading, U.K.) Gross score 39
Net Score 31
Handicap 16 (Society only...is that ok?)
Happy with that after an 8 week lay-off! I think I'll put the clubs
away again now til April.
Phil.
|
| 1130.38 | Inlcude +/- | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Wed Jan 23 1991 09:34 | 28 |
|
Hi Phil,
Hey great shooting ! That's how to get the ball rolling !
One thing you forgot to do is , when you enter your score, you
MUST include what the score is related to par (+/-) ... if
you want to enter the score itself that's OK, as long as we
know how many over or under it was.
Example --
Course name St Andrews par 72 front 36, back 36
Your score 81 45 36
------ ----- -----
totals +/- +9 +9 EVEN
So you'll have to reply with the +/- for that course...
thanks
Walta
|
| 1130.39 | enter score- 9x2 or 18 | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Wed Jan 23 1991 09:37 | 10 |
|
HI,
Also... I forgot to add, define the course as being 18 holes...
or 9x2 .
thanks
Walta
|
| 1130.40 | Correction Made | CHEFS::NEWPORTP | | Wed Jan 23 1991 12:02 | 27 |
| Sorry folks....obviously got carried away with the excitement!
Here's the revised data...
Windlemere Golf Club, Surrey, UK (9 hole course) - 19th Jan. 1991
PAR 34 +/- PAR
Gross Score 39 +5
Net Score 31 -3
Handicap 16 (society only)
Golf is playable here in the Reading area...it's just a bit soggy
underfoot.
Phil.
Phil.
|
| 1130.41 | | PUTTER::WARFIELD | Gone Golfing | Wed Jan 23 1991 12:10 | 13 |
| RE: .36
> ... It is hard to go more than two weeks though
> for me, I get irritable and my significant other tells me to go out
> and play no matter what the conditions. I can't imagine not being
> able to play for 3-4 months at a time !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's easy to imagine if you've got kids, remember when your wife
was pregnant, remember what sex was like then....Well being a NE
golfer during the winter feels just like that, except that you
watch others enjoying golf on Network TV!
Larry
|
| 1130.42 | another entry | FLAMES::THRASHER | | Wed Jan 23 1991 12:25 | 14 |
| My low score for the 91 season (so far!!!!)
Date: 13-Jan-91
Eagle Watch Golf Club, Woodstock Georgia 18 hole course (Public)
Par 72 front 36 back 36
front 45 +9 back 39 +3 total 84 USGA handicap 17 net 67
Course very damp, dormant Bermuda fairways, bent grass greens are in
excellant shape.
West coast is not the only year round golfers paradise
Dan
|
| 1130.43 | Current Leader(s) | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Wed Feb 13 1991 14:48 | 16 |
|
Status
------
Best 18 Holes
Low Gross Dan Thrasher- Georgia US 84 +12
Low Net Dan Thrasher- Georgia US 84-17=67 -5
Best 9
Low Gross Dan Thrasher- Georgia US 39 +3
Low Net Dan Thrasher- Georgia US 39-8=31 -5
|
| 1130.44 | Handicap Calculation for 9 | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Wed Feb 13 1991 14:56 | 18 |
|
Hi everyone,
To keep things simple (for me) I am dividing the 18 hole handicap
by 2, and rounding down.
So if you have a 23 handicap , it'll figure to be an 11 for 9 .
On the lighter side ;
The way everyone will be shooting to beat Dan, I was thinking of
getting him a shirt with a bulls-eye on the back! :)
keep those scores coming ...
Walta
|
| 1130.45 | Question | CHEFS::NEWPORTP | | Thu Feb 14 1991 07:03 | 22 |
| Walta,
Just so that I know how hard I've got to chase Dan, are we saying that
when there are two identical gross and net scores then the best is the
one which shows better against the par?
I.E. par 34 Gross 39 Hcap 8 = Net 31 +5/-3
par 36 Gross 39 Hcap 8 = Net 31 +3/-5
So here is the second score better than the first? The above is where
Dan and I stand at the moment... see .40.
Just Curious,
Phil.
|
| 1130.46 | 2nd Score better | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Thu Feb 14 1991 08:45 | 20 |
|
Reply -1
Hi Phil,
In the exanmple you gave, the better score would be the 2nd
score... The lowest scores rated +/- against par will be
the winners.
I did it this way to open up the competition to ANY type of course,
even a par 3 course can be played in this format.
Dan's scores will be tough to beat, but knowing the crew in this
notes file he might have to do better ;) !
Good luck all,
Walta
|
| 1130.47 | Early season leaders don't always finish first | FLAMES::THRASHER | | Thu Feb 14 1991 12:57 | 14 |
| Walta,
The shirt size is a medium. This note has been rather quiet for
awhile. I expect my scores to be beaten soon. There are to many good
golfers in this file for them to stand. Being able to play year round
and getting a good score in early helps. At least I am in the running
early. As I have said before, any noter visiting the Atlanta area who
wants to get together for 18, give me a call at DTN 343-1291. There are
58 public courses in the greater Atlanta area.
Good luck everybody and I hope I have another score to enter soon.
Dan
|
| 1130.48 | Post this score !!! | RAYBOK::COOPER | One-ton Tomato ! | Thu Feb 14 1991 16:18 | 24 |
| Mad Hacker rips Rancho Canada West for new personal best !!
Hi Walta,
Well, here is one to post for everyone to shoot at when their
courses finally open. Saturday Feb 9th, Rancho Canada West, Mad
Hacker fires new personal best of 83 during a digtial GOLF league
event. With my handicap of 22 for the course that puts me in with
a net 61 !!
Rancho Canada West, Carmel, Cal.
slope = 120
rating = 69.6
par = 72
yards = 6205
front =43 back = 40 tot=83 hdcp= 22 net= 61
I did win my flight, (by 9 shots !!) and also had low net (by 8 shots)
Probably will win sandbagger of the year for this one but I will take
it. This was my first round under 85 so I have attained my goal for 91.
Mad Hacker
|
| 1130.49 | Happiness is short lived | FLAMES::THRASHER | | Fri Feb 15 1991 08:14 | 14 |
| Hey Mad Hacker,
I hope you wear a medium shirt, I already put my order in for the
shirt with the bulls-eye on the back with Walta.
Congrats on your round. A net 61 will be hard to beat. In my case
I would have to shoot 77, possible if I could play consistently for 18
holes. I either have a good nine bad nine or two bad nines. Haven't
solved the puzzle yet.
Hit em straight.
Dan
|
| 1130.50 | congratulations let's see more | SONATA::FEENEY | non golfers live half a life | Fri Feb 15 1991 08:46 | 3 |
| Great news. Having played with you at the Fox I can attest to your achievement
as being extraordinary. I understood the appropriateness of the name "the Mad
Hacker", however I did see a glimmer of hope. Is a name change in order?
|
| 1130.51 | new name? | MACNAS::SPOMPHRETT | | Fri Feb 15 1991 09:08 | 2 |
| re .50:
How about "the happy hacker"?
|
| 1130.52 | Congrats | CHEFS::NEWPORTP | | Fri Feb 15 1991 09:54 | 9 |
| Bravo MH....a new best in February!! So what happens for the rest
of the year? If you're like me, it'll be a case of saying "Well how did
I do that???"
Good luck anyway,
Phil.
|
| 1130.53 | Leaders to date | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Fri Feb 15 1991 10:39 | 19 |
|
Leader Board to date
---------------------
Best 18 Holes
Low Gross Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 83 +11
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 83-22=61 -11
Best 9
Low Gross Dan Thrasher -Ga US 39 +3
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 40-11=29 -7
Best 9 x 2
No Entries to date
|
| 1130.54 | updates on 1wk hold... | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Fri Feb 15 1991 10:48 | 20 |
|
Hi Everyone,
Gee MH... you didn't waste much time taking Dan out! Guess you'll
have to fit into the medium tee-shirt I ordered for Dan ;) !
With that GREAT score you may need a bullet proof vest, it
should hold for quite a while... congratulations!
The good thing is we all have plenty of time to bump him off !
I'll be out next week ... so the leader board will get updated
when I get back, unless someone wants to do it?
If you do, just extract the old one, and update it with the new
leader(s) . Then reply to this note , with the updated file.
Good luck,
Walta
|
| 1130.55 | 2X will do it !! | RAYBOK::COOPER | One-ton Tomato ! | Fri Feb 15 1991 14:37 | 5 |
| It was pretty scary shooting so low at this time of the year. I
usually save my best stuff for May and June. By the way, I wear
a size 2X shirt !! A medium would probably cover one side though !!
Mad Hacker
|
| 1130.56 | it had to happen | NAPIER::PAPPAS | Jay Pappas | Mon Feb 18 1991 09:47 | 4 |
|
Nice going Jim.......I knew I saw sparks of greatness in that swing....
Jay
|
| 1130.57 | Hacker strikes again !! | RAYBOK::COOPER | One-ton Tomato ! | Tue Feb 19 1991 12:25 | 16 |
| Mad Hacker beats his ownself !!!
Monday, Feb 18th, Rancho Canada East course.
Par 71, Slope= 114, 6118 yds from the tips, 68.9 rating
Gross score = 81 Net = 60 (shot 40-41)
I'm not sure why I am playing so well right now but I guess that is
how golf works. When all these scores that I have posted in the last
3 weeks finally affect my index in April it should drop drastically.
Probably go back to the mid 90's about the same time.
Get that shirt ready Walta !!!
Mad Hacker
|
| 1130.58 | You want how many strokes??? | NEWPRT::JOHNSON_DO | | Tue Feb 19 1991 18:50 | 8 |
| I am sure glad you are not a member of my club. In the old west they
shot card sharks, probably because they didn't have golf courses. Your
21 handicap should take a beating. Let us know what the effect was
next month, assuming you posted the results. Two rounds at a 13/14
should bring you down below a bogie golfer. Congratulations, you have
made an elite club. What is your next goal??
So Cal Dandy
|
| 1130.59 | Leader Board | WALTA::LENEHAN | stick-em | Tue Feb 26 1991 09:38 | 20 |
|
Leader Board to date
---------------------
Best 18 Holes
Low Gross Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 81 +10
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 83-22=61 -11
Best 9
Low Gross Dan Thrasher -Ga US 39 +3
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 40-11=29 -7
Best 9 x 2
No Entries to date
|
| 1130.60 | Mad Hacker sitting pretty (maybe) | FLAMES::THRASHER | | Thu Mar 14 1991 13:02 | 10 |
| It looks like the mad hacker has settled into a comfortable position.
Just so he doesn't get to comfortable, I want him to know that our golf
season is officially underway this weekend and I plan on working extra
hard over the next few weeks to get that bullseye shirt back. I hope
Walta hasn't let the seams out on it just yet. How about the rest of
you guys/gals, are you going to let the mad hacker sit out there with
a :) on his face.
Dan
|
| 1130.61 | Any day now | WALTA::LENEHAN | I'll press... | Thu Mar 14 1991 14:47 | 21 |
|
Hi Dan,
Aaaaaarrrrrrrrghghghghrghrghrghrghrgrhgrhgrhghgr!
3-6 inches of snow forcast for Mass ! Our hands are tied
in Mass... we can't even fight back yet :( ! Just when things
were looking good too, maybe the weathermen will blunder?
I hope!
I know the 81 gross will fall, but the -11 net may last a
looooooooong time ... that's one awesome round!
counting down in Mass
Walta
|
| 1130.62 | I'm ready for spring | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Fri Mar 15 1991 12:21 | 17 |
|
re .61
> 3-6 inches of snow forcast for Mass ! Our hands are tied
> in Mass... we can't even fight back yet :( ! Just when things
> were looking good too, maybe the weathermen will blunder?
> I hope!
Last time I recall a blunder when they said 3 - 6 was the blizzard of
'78. Of course they may have meant 3-6 feet, in which case they
were right on.
Ya, the -11 is gonna be tough, let's see, to tie it I'd have to break
par, something I've never seriously threatened. Oh well there still
the 9 and 2 * 9
--Bob
|
| 1130.63 | Go fishing !!! | RAYBOK::COOPER | One-ton Tomato ! | Fri Mar 15 1991 14:01 | 7 |
| I think you guys all ought to go fishing this year !! My -11 net
will not be beaten (unless I do it in the club championship this
weekend), but I must agree with Walta that the gross 81 will fall.
Keep that 2X shirt ready Walta, the Mad Hacker isn't through
yet !!!
Mad Hacker
|
| 1130.64 | Please post this score | CHEFS::HEELAN | Andaluz por deseo | Fri Mar 22 1991 13:59 | 22 |
| Course: Donnington Valley, Newbury, UK
Date: 22 March 1991
18 Holes, 3780 yards, 3 winter greens, all winter tees
Front Nine Back Nine Total
Par 30 31 61
Score 36 41 77
+6 +10 +16
Handicap 27
Net course score (77-27)= 50
Net variance against par (50-61)= -11
Cheers
John
|
| 1130.65 | Must Putt-out all holes | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon Mar 25 1991 08:02 | 23 |
|
Reply -1
Hi John and evreryone else,
Running a tourny can be a dirty job....
John Heelan's GREAT score of -11 net, which would have tied him with
the Mad Hacker will not be counted . The reason being that he
was playing temperary greens and didn't put out all 18 holes.
I feel bad because temperary greens or not -11 net is awesome
shooting... but to be honest I didn't expect scores to be counted
if temperary greens were involved.
So to be sure; If anyone has posted a score up to now, and didn't
put out on every hole, please let me know ... that score will not
count.
sorry , but I feel it would be most fair ;
Walta
|
| 1130.66 | From the tips at Overlook... | NEWPRT::JOHNSON_DO | | Mon Mar 25 1991 13:55 | 10 |
| Re: Tourney scores
Can't remember, but should we consider the course rating as well?
Seems that a 3700 yard course up against a 6900 yard course should have
some equalizers such as rating. Maybe variance should be against
rating so that a 77 on a coursse rated 74 is better than a 77 on a
course rated 68 or even 58 in the case of most executive courses.
SoCalDandy (Always Playing from the Tips)
|
| 1130.67 | stroke/slope? nope | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon Mar 25 1991 14:21 | 13 |
|
hi SoCalDandy,
Course ratings would work fairly if everyone played from
the tips... but most golfers play from the white tees
which would make it more complicated to figure. Plus
the extra math is depressing ! :)
waiting for spring to spring ....
Walta
|
| 1130.68 | awful quiet in here | FLAMES::THRASHER | | Wed Apr 10 1991 12:21 | 15 |
| Whats happening out there? This note is deeeeeaaaad. The weather up
north has been nice enough for you New Englanders to get out and play.
I make this observation from many unreturned phone calls from folks
who only miss work because of sunny afternoons in the 60s during April.
Is anyone out there getting close to our leader. Maybe you need to have
the top ten scores in here Walta so the interest picks up.
I have been shooting some decent scores (for me), but nothing
close to the 78 or so I would need to recapture first place. Another
problem is my handicap is coming down (dropped from 18 to 16)which
makes it even more difficult.
Dan
|
| 1130.69 | who knows! | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | loose cannon | Thu Apr 11 1991 10:21 | 5 |
| I don't have any idea whether this gets on the board or not. I carry a
USGA handicap of 12. My course is a par 72, rated 72, with a slope of
'USGA' 120. I shot 40/39 for 79. Is this even close?
Rick
|
| 1130.70 | Leader Board -only 8mnths left | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Thu Apr 11 1991 10:49 | 33 |
|
LEADER BOARD to date
---------------------
Mens Division
================================================================================
Best 18 Holes
Low Gross Rick Fagley 79 +7
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 83-22=61 -11
Best 9
Low Gross Dan Thrasher -Ga US 39 +3
Rick Fagley 39 +3
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 40-11=29 -7
Best 9 x 2
No Entries to date
Womens Division
================================================================================
No entries to date
|
| 1130.71 | | SIOG::OGRADY | | Fri Apr 12 1991 08:43 | 16 |
| I'm not sure about the rules for this competition , but I had a 73 (+1)
in a tournament round ( no gimmies ...honest! ) on Easter Sunday.
It was on my home course here in Ireland, a par 72 course , 6400 yds
SSS = 71.
The SSS is the measure of difficulty used in Ireland. Your handicap
changes as a result of the SSS score - your Nett score.
My handicap is 8, so it would represent 6 under the SSS ( Standard
Scratch Score ).
My handicap will not change, though, as the competition was a fourball
and is thus non-counting.
Normally one doesn't hole out on all 18 holes in this type of
competition but in that case I did. My partner was having an off day.
I'll be interested to see if it counts for the DEC World Open.
Martin
|
| 1130.72 | | KOOZEE::WARFIELD | | Mon Apr 15 1991 16:31 | 15 |
| Boy, I'm bummed I played saturday for the first time all year, shoot up the
back nine with a 3 over 39 (net 32). Checking out the DECworld Open I find
that I join a crowd at 39, & am not even close in the net division. (Of course
if it's a leading indicator of the up coming season...I may get a few more
chances.)
Larry
Best 9
Low Gross Dan Thrasher -Ga US 39 +3
Rick Fagley 39 +3
Larry Warfield 39
|
| 1130.73 | Murphy shoots lights out !! | RAYBOK::COOPER | One-ton Tomato ! | Mon Apr 15 1991 17:08 | 16 |
| Well, some new great news out of the Santa Clara golf league.
We played yesterday at Franklin Canyon GC and Mike Murphy
of the commercial sales group shot an even par 72 for the
day. Mike is a 9 handicapper who has won the first 5 events
this year in his flight.
Course rating = 68.9
Slope = 114
Yardage = 6193
Front 9 = 34 gross -5 = net 29 !!
Back 9 = 38 gross -4 = net 34
Gross = 72 Net =61
Jim Cooper (Tournament Director) aka Mad Hacker
|
| 1130.74 | OOPS !! 63 not 61 | RAYBOK::COOPER | One-ton Tomato ! | Mon Apr 15 1991 19:01 | 6 |
| Walta,
I must correct my reply .73 . Mike Murphy had a net 63 not 61 !!
My math was a little off. His net 29 on the front side should be
a keeper though.
Mad Hacker
|
| 1130.75 | div by 2 and round down | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Tue Apr 16 1991 08:35 | 14 |
|
reply -1
hi MH,
To calculate the 9 hole handicap divide the 18 hole by 2 and
round down.
So Mike Murphy would get 4 shots a side making low net score for
9 = 30 .
new leader board coming up...
Walta
|
| 1130.76 | Leader Board | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Tue Apr 16 1991 08:36 | 32 |
|
LEADER BOARD to date
---------------------
Mens Division
================================================================================
Best 18 Holes
Low Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 83-22=61 -11
Best 9
Low Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 40-11=29 -7
Best 9 x 2
No Entries to date
Womens Division
================================================================================
No entries to date
|
| 1130.77 | I did myself one better! | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | loose cannon | Tue Apr 16 1991 11:40 | 6 |
| I think I got a better round on 4/18. Again, USGA handicap of 12.
course is a par 72 rated at 72. Slope is 'USGA' 120. I shot 36/42
for 78. This might be my last chance, I see my handicap dropping with
the new card May 1.
Rick
|
| 1130.78 | Why only 4 per side ? | RAYBOK::COOPER | One-ton Tomato ! | Tue Apr 16 1991 14:57 | 10 |
| Walta,
I thought you took your strokes where they fell according to
the rating of each hole. Since five of the holes where Mike got
strokes were on the front 9, I thought that was how to figure it.
I don't understand how you could have ann odd handicap then because
you would be giving up a stroke, please clarify as I am totally
confused now. Thanks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MH
|
| 1130.79 | | PUTTER::WARFIELD | Gone Golfing | Tue Apr 16 1991 18:13 | 13 |
| Re: a few back
> Well, some new great news out of the Santa Clara golf league.
> We played yesterday at Franklin Canyon GC and Mike Murphy
> of the commercial sales group shot an even par 72 for the
> day. Mike is a 9 handicapper who has won the first 5 events
> this year in his flight.
As a golfer I'm envious of Mike's good round. As a stock holder I get worried
when I see the guys in sales playing to well! ;-) (Just kidding Mike, it's
the envy coming thru.)
Larry
|
| 1130.80 | Error Corrected | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Wed Apr 17 1991 08:41 | 19 |
|
Hi Madness,
You are right. My mistake... When playing an 18 hole course
there is no need to tinker with the handicap to avoid half
strokes.
Forinstance if someone has a 9 handicap for 18, they won't
be a 4.5 handicap when playing a 9 hole course... they will
loose the .5 and become a 4 .
But in Mike's case he is entitled to the stroke, because he was
playing an 18 hole course.
Sorry for the screwup!
I'll post the new leader board next.
thanks Walta
|
| 1130.81 | Leader Board | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Wed Apr 17 1991 08:45 | 32 |
|
LEADER BOARD to date
---------------------
Mens Division
================================================================================
Best 18 Holes
Low Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 83-22=61 -11
Best 9
Low Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 40-11=29 -7
Mike Murphy -Cal US 34-5 =29 -7
Best 9 x 2
No Entries to date
Womens Division
================================================================================
No entries to date
|
| 1130.82 | You can play 18 on a 9-hole course too. | MACNAS::SPOMPHRETT | | Wed Apr 17 1991 09:46 | 9 |
| Walta,
On this side of the big pond 9 hole course are handicapped/indexed 1-18
also. Typically the odd numbers are on the "first" 9 and the even on
the back 9. Therefore, a 9 handicapper would have 5 shots for his first
nine holes, and 4 for the second nine. Therefore it is necessary to
know whether a good 9 was either first or second time round the course
during the play of the 18 holes.
Sean
|
| 1130.83 | strokes for odd cappers | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Wed Apr 17 1991 10:25 | 22 |
|
Reply -1
Hi Sean,
Hmmm... I see your point. A 9 handicapper shouldn't loose a stroke
he/she is entitled to.
When it comes to an 18 hole course it's easy to handle odd numbered
handicaps, but with 9 hole courses it begins to get tricky.
I want to be fair to everyone. Can anyone tell me how you give
strokes to odd numbered handicappers, when they only play 9?
If forinstance a 9 capper was to play 9 holes in an after work
match... would he/she get 4 or 5 strokes?
thanks for the help,
Walta
|
| 1130.84 | New Entry | DECXPS::ENO | GH FAN FOR 20 YEARS | Thu Apr 18 1991 01:32 | 21 |
|
I'm new to this conference and I'm not sure how to figure this all out.
I play at Pine Valley golf course in Pelham N.H.
My best score so far this year is 80
9 hole golf course
course rating = 62.7
par 70
Front nine I shot a 38
back nine I shot a 42
My USGA handicap is 20
The tee's are in different locations on the front and the back nine
Now does this mean I shot a net 60?
Paul Eno
|
| 1130.85 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Thu Apr 18 1991 08:10 | 34 |
|
LEADER BOARD to date
---------------------
Mens Division
================================================================================
Best 18 Holes
Low Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 83-22=61 -11
Best 9
Low Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 40-11=29 -7
Mike Murphy -Cal US 34-5 =29 -7
Paul Eno -Mass US 38-10=28 -7 (par35)
Best 9 x 2
Low Gross Paul Eno -Mass US 38-42=80 +10 (par70)
Low Net Paul Eno -Mass US 80-20=60 -10 (par70)
Womens Division
================================================================================
No entries to date
|
| 1130.86 | {odd handicaps?} | BOSOX::WEWING | | Thu Apr 18 1991 13:38 | 10 |
| if you have an odd handicap (i.e. - 9) and only play nine
holes of an eighteen hole course, shouldn't your handicap
be one stroke for each of the 9 most difficult holes on the
course. If only three of those are on the 9 you play, you
get three strokes. If 6 of those 'hard' holes are on your
9, you get 6.
makes sense to me.
hack nicklaus
|
| 1130.87 | Just do it ;) | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Thu Apr 18 1991 16:08 | 18 |
|
Hi Hack,
For an 18 hole course getting as many strokes as you
are entitled via the difficulty ratings will work great.
Does that also make sense for a 9 hole course? Maybe all 9
hole courses have the tees further back on the first 9,
which would make the odd capper get more strokes the first nine...
Well I guess I'll just leave it up to all of you to figure out
the strokes you deserve when playing 9 ... I'm sure those
who have odd numbered caps will come up with something fair.
sorry for all the confusion;
Walta
|
| 1130.88 | Round of my life! | MACNAS::SPOMPHRETT | | Mon Apr 29 1991 09:18 | 26 |
| On Sun. 28 April, in an 18 hole stableford competition on my home
course, I beat my best ever previous round by SIX shots. The course,
Athenry Golf Club in Galway, is a 9 hole one, par 34 per 9 giving par
68 for the 18.
I opened up bogey, double bogey, bogey, par double bogey. Just another
mediocre Sunday morning score, I told myself. Then I freaked out. Pars
on 6, 7, 8 & 9 brought me to the turn 6 over. Okay, now it was a
resonable round in prospect. But the second 9 beat everything I ever
did before: bogey, par, par, birdie, par, eagle, par, par, par.
Needless to remark my knees were shaking over the last three holes as I
struggled to keep the score together, but thankfully the holes all
seemed about 6 feet wide as I sank a 4 footer for par on 16, 15 footer
from 5 feet off the green for par on 17 and 12 footer for par on 18.
My handicap is (was) 13, so my scores for the 2 nines and the 18 were:
First nine : Gross 40, par 34, H'cap 7, nett 33 (-1)
Second nine: Gross 32, par 34, H'cap 6, nett 26 (-8)
18 ovearll: Gross 72, par 68, H'cap 13, nett 59 (-9)
I reckon this should get me on the leader board for a while!
I would like to say I don't like to boast, but, shucks, one can only
take modesty so far!!
Sean
|
| 1130.89 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon Apr 29 1991 10:13 | 34 |
|
LEADER BOARD to date
---------------------
Mens Division
================================================================================
Best 18 Holes
Low Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 83-22=61 -11
Best 9
Low Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Low Net Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32-6 =26 -8 (par34)
Best 9 x 2
Low Gross Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 40-32=72 +4 (par68)
Low Net Paul Eno -Mass US 80-20=60 -10 (par70)
Womens Division
================================================================================
No entries to date
|
| 1130.90 | Barts Inquiring Mind | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Thu May 02 1991 08:23 | 31 |
|
|\/\/\/|
| |
| |
| (o)(o) Hey Dudes!
C _)
| ,___| --> How come noone from Mass
| / input any scores yet?
/____\ Hmmmmmmmm???
/ \
__&__
/ \
| |
| (o)(o)
C .---_) --> Because dummy...
| |.___|
| \__/ Noone in Mass can take golf
/_____\ seriously, with the Bruins
/_____/ \ AND Celtics in the playoffs !
/ \
|
| 1130.91 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon May 06 1991 08:36 | 34 |
|
LEADER BOARD to date
---------------------
Mens Division
================================================================================
Best 18 Holes
Low Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Low Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 83-22=61 -11
Best 9
Low Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Low Net Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32-6 =26 -8 (par34)
Best 9 x 2
Low Gross Walter Lenehan -MAss US 36-36=72 +2 (par70)
Low Net Paul Eno -Mass US 80-20=60 -10 (par70)
Womens Division
================================================================================
No entries to date
|
| 1130.92 | an entry for Women's division | MAST::LENEHAN | | Mon May 13 1991 10:33 | 10 |
| Hi,
Although I am not too proud of the score, I will enter it just
to make an entry in the Women's division.
I shot a 52 at Monoosnock yesterday. It's par 36 for women and
my handicap is 15 for nine. So, I shot 1 over par for net.
Eunhwa
|
| 1130.93 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon May 13 1991 11:30 | 32 |
|
Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 83-22=61 -11
Womens
No Entries
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Net Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32-6 =26 -8 (par34)
Womens
Gross Eunhwa Lenehan -Mass US 52 +16
Net Eunhwa Lenehan -Mass US 52-15=37 +1
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 36-36=72 +2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 80-20=60 -10 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.94 | beat my own record | MAST::LENEHAN | | Thu May 16 1991 10:06 | 8 |
| Hi,
I shot 50 for 9 at Monoosnock yesterday. My handicap for 9 is 15.
Women's par is 36.
Gee, I feel like I am competing with myself...
Eunhwa
|
| 1130.95 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Thu May 16 1991 10:15 | 32 |
|
Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 83-22=61 -11
Womens
No Entries
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Net Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32-6 =26 -8 (par34)
Womens
Gross Eunhwa Lenehan -Mass US 50 +14
Net Eunhwa Lenehan -Mass US 50-15=35 -1
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 36-36=72 +2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 80-20=60 -10 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.96 | | FSDEV1::LWARE | | Thu May 16 1991 10:32 | 14 |
|
Eunhwa, I find it really hard to believe that your handicap for
nine holes is a 15! Sandbagger...
Just to keep you honest...
45 on the front 9 at juniper
Par 36
league handicap of 10 for 9 holes
-Laura
|
| 1130.97 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Thu May 16 1991 11:29 | 33 |
|
Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Net Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 83-22=61 -11
Womens
No Entries
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Net Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32-6 =26 -8 (par34)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45 +9
Net Eunhwa Lenehan -Mass US 50-15=35 -1
Laura Ware -Mass US 45-10=35 -1
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 36-36=72 +2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 80-20=60 -10 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.98 | | NEWPRT::JOHNSON_DO | | Fri May 17 1991 13:49 | 2 |
|
|
| 1130.99 | LEADER BOARD UP-DATE | SOLVIT::FISK | | Mon May 20 1991 11:13 | 34 |
| - Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Net Owen Fisk -NH US 81-22=59 -13
Jim Cooper aka Mad Hacker -Cal US 83-22=61 -11
Womens
No Entries
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Net Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32-6 =26 -8 (par34)
Net Owen Fisk -NH US 39-11=28 -8 Tie
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45 +9
Net Eunhwa Lenehan -Mass US 50-15=35 -1
Laura Ware -Mass US 45-10=35 -1
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 36-36=72 +2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 80-20=60 -10 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.100 | Womens 18 posted !! | RAYBOK::COOPER | One-ton Tomato ! | Mon May 20 1991 15:15 | 24 |
| Walta,
Another entry from the digital GOLF league in Santa Clara.
This last Saturday (May 18th), Lindalee Cummings shot a fine
106 at the Laguna Seca GC in Monterey, Cal under British Open
type conditions. With her handicap of 36 this equals net 68.
Laguna Seca GC - for the ladies 5186 yds, par 72, slope 119
rating 70.2
front nine 50 (par 37)
back nine 54 (par 35)
____
104
Handicap 36
____
net 68
This 68 was low net for the event and she also won womens long
drive !!!
Please post this score Walta !!
Mad Hacker
|
| 1130.101 | Almost | SOFBAS::SULLIVAN | | Mon May 20 1991 17:06 | 15 |
|
I See I was just a few puts away from closing in on the top.
Grandview C.C Leominster, Ma. Front Back Total Net
40 39 79 63
I presently have a 8 handicap (and soon to drop) in the Maynard
Golf league @ Stow. BTW the Grandview is a par 72. This is my best
gross round ever! 5 bogies and a birdie on the front. 3 bogies and
pared in from 13 !!!
I have been working out anew swing and can't wait to see what happens!!
- Dave
|
| 1130.102 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Tue May 21 1991 09:03 | 34 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Net Owen Fisk -NH US 81-22=59 -13
Womens
Gross Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-54=104 +32
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Net Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32-6 =26 -8 (par34)
Net Owen Fisk -NH US 39-11=28 -8
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45 +9
Net Eunhwa Lenehan -Mass US 50-15=35 -1
Laura Ware -Mass US 45-10=35 -1
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 36-36=72 +2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 80-20=60 -10 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.103 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Tue May 21 1991 14:05 | 34 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Net Owen Fisk -NH US 81-22=59 -13
Womens
Gross Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-54=104 +32
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Net Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32-6 =26 -8 (par34)
Owen Fisk -NH US 39-11=28 -8
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45 +9
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 36-36=72 +2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 80-20=60 -10 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.104 | A European challenge | SIOG::OGRADY | | Fri May 24 1991 11:50 | 10 |
| Walta,
Here's another score to put the Europeans back in the game. Sean Pomphretts
score needs some support (!).
I made a par round yesterday (72) over a 6300 yd course in Ireland.
I'm playing off 8 so the nett isn't mapped !
Pity it wasn't a competition round, just a friendly money game with
fellow Deccies.
martin
|
| 1130.105 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | tempo mental | Fri May 24 1991 14:00 | 36 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Net Owen Fisk -NH US 81-22=59 -13
Womens
Gross Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-54=104 +32
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Net Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32-6 =26 -8 (par34)
Owen Fisk -NH US 39-11=28 -8
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45 +9
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 36-36=72 +2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 80-20=60 -10 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.106 | | NEWPRT::JOHNSON_DO | | Fri May 24 1991 17:55 | 8 |
| Re:
With Lennehan, Callahan, Oshaugnessy, Murphy and Ponphrett, do I need
to change my name to O'Johnson to have a chance?
Is this some sort of green(get it...golf... green...Irish)conspiracy.
SCD
|
| 1130.107 | Green Roots. | MACNAS::SPOMPHRETT | | Mon May 27 1991 08:32 | 10 |
| Mike O'Grady won't mind being called Oshaughnessy after that round, will
you, Mike?
It's nice to see that all the real talent is showing its roots, though.
Now if only we could have an all Irish team in the Ryder Cup..........
Nice to see new names appearing every week. Keep the scores coming, as
this is one of the most fun competitions in the whole calendar.
Sean
|
| 1130.108 | NEW LOW | DASXPS::ENO | GH FAN FOR 20 YEARS | Mon May 27 1991 23:35 | 16 |
| This is Paul Eno again, I play at Pine Valley Pelham N.H
This is a nine hole course white tees front nine blue tees back nine.
the course rating went down to 62.7, slope = 110 which made my handicap
go up.
On May 26,1991 I hit a 79.
My handicap now = 21
Front nine I hit 43
Back nine I hit 36 (my career low)
Total = 79 net 58
Paul G. Eno
|
| 1130.109 | Good to see SEVE back | SIOG::OGRADY | | Tue May 28 1991 04:07 | 5 |
| re:.107
No Sean, O'Shaughnessy will do nicely.
O'Grady (Martin) says.......
|
| 1130.110 | even par | AQUA::STIRLING | | Tue May 28 1991 08:39 | 4 |
| i shot 72 at wachusett on sunday for an even par round.
the course is a par 72 and my handicap is 5.
dan
|
| 1130.111 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Tue May 28 1991 08:44 | 36 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Net Owen Fisk -NH US 81-22=59 -13
Womens
Gross Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-54=104 +32
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Net Paul Eno -NH US 36-10=26 -9 (par35)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45 +9
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 36-36=72 +2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.112 | even | AQUA::STIRLING | | Mon Jun 03 1991 08:52 | 5 |
| i shot another even par round friday. 71 at juniper hills.
i went out in 34 and in in 37. my handicap is still 5.
dan
|
| 1130.113 | From the red markers... | FSDEV2::LWARE | | Mon Jun 03 1991 10:32 | 11 |
|
I shot a 94 at juniper hills on sunday.
Font 45
Back 49
league handicap 20
-Laura
|
| 1130.114 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon Jun 03 1991 11:21 | 36 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Net Owen Fisk -NH US 81-22=59 -13
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45-49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Net Paul Eno -NH US 36-10=26 -9 (par35)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45 +9
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 36-36=72 +2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.115 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon Jun 03 1991 13:57 | 44 |
|
* note - there was an error in the scoring...
womens best 9 gross is now +10, not +9
Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Net Owen Fisk -NH US 81-22=59 -13
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45-49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Net Paul Eno -NH US 36-10=26 -9 (par35)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45 +10
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 36-36=72 +2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.116 | Home course advantage | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon Jun 10 1991 08:15 | 13 |
|
Hi,
I finally broke par for 18...
Played my home course from the tips, Monoosnock CC (9 holes)
6200 yards par 70 .
Score 35 33 68 (-2)
Walta
|
| 1130.117 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon Jun 10 1991 08:17 | 37 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Net Owen Fisk -NH US 81-22=59 -13
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45-49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Walter Lenehan -Mass US 33 -2 (par35)
Net Paul Eno -NH US 36-10=26 -9 (par35)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45 +10
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35-33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.118 | | FSDEV2::LWARE | | Tue Jun 11 1991 09:54 | 12 |
|
The new lakeside course at Juniper
43 for nine holes
36 Par
10 handicap
I almost feel guilty about putting this in, the course is very short
from the reds.
|
| 1130.119 | What's your secret? | MAST::LENEHAN | | Tue Jun 11 1991 10:14 | 7 |
| Hi Laura,
The pregnancy is helping my game, what's helping yours? I think
your method is better ;)
Eunhwa
|
| 1130.120 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Tue Jun 11 1991 10:36 | 37 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Net Owen Fisk -NH US 81-22=59 -13
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45-49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Walter Lenehan -Mass US 33 -2 (par35)
Net Paul Eno -NH US 36-10=26 -9 (par35)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35-33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.121 | Another day, another stroke... | FSDEV1::LWARE | | Wed Jun 12 1991 10:10 | 20 |
|
I can't be the only lady in DEC that plays golf, come on ladies...
Front 9 at juniper
Par 35
hcp 9
score 42
|
| 1130.122 | My best nine and best 18 yet (86) | TRACTR::OSBORNE | | Mon Jun 24 1991 10:13 | 10 |
| Well, I didn't make the board for the 9 x 2 but I did tie for one nine.
I shot a 40 on the back nine, which has the extra hole for the
handi-capping, with a USGA handi-cap of 27.
40-14=26 = -9 (PAR 35)
Best nine I've ever had. I had a few shudda, coudda, woudda's but
didn't. I'm still pleased.
Stu
|
| 1130.123 | I'm official | BTOQA::SHANE | | Mon Jun 24 1991 11:55 | 6 |
|
Well I finally got an official, although extremely high, handicap.
Just got my card, and it says (25). So I'll hopefully be turning in
some scores soon......Shane
|
| 1130.124 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Tue Jun 25 1991 12:20 | 37 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Net Owen Fisk -NH US 81-22=59 -13
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45-49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 34 -2
Sean Pomphrett -Gal Ire 32 -2 (par34)
Walter Lenehan -Mass US 33 -2 (par35)
Net Paul Eno -NH US 36-10=26 -9 (par35)
Stu Osborne - US 40-14=26 -9 (par35)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35-33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.125 | New low net !!! | RAYBOK::COOPER | One-ton Tomato ! | Wed Jun 26 1991 14:47 | 12 |
| Walta,
I got another one for you !!! On June 15th the digital GOLF league
played the Las Positas GC in Livermore, Cal. Randi Rost playing to
a 25 shot 42-39 81 gross 56 net !!! The course is rated at 71.1 with
a slope of 119. Yardage is 6500 yds. Randi was -2 on the back through
7 holes and managed to double bogie the last two !! He got 13 strokes
on the front and 12 on the back. Please post this new low net.
Thanks.
Mad Hacker
(as an aside, Mike Murphy has left the company so do you want to keep
his scores posted ? )
|
| 1130.126 | best 9 | NHASAD::BLAISDELL | Keep an even keel | Thu Jun 27 1991 12:26 | 7 |
|
....and another. New leader for best 9 hole round.
Bob Mook in a league round shot a 33 (-3) at Green Meadows.
(South/back)
-rick
|
| 1130.127 | Leader Board | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon Jul 01 1991 08:16 | 37 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Net Randi Rost -Cal US 81-25=26 -16
Owen Fisk -NH US 81-22=59 -13
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45-49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Bob Mook - US 33 -3
Net Paul Eno -NH US 36-10=26 -9 (par35)
Stu Osborne - US 40-14=26 -9 (par35)
Randi Rost -Cal US 39-12=27 -9
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35-33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.128 | best I can do! | GRANPA::RFAGLEY | loose cannon | Mon Jul 01 1991 15:42 | 5 |
| I've got a new career low. USGA handicap 11. USGA course par is 72.
USGA slope 120. I shot 37/37 for 74. Does it get me on the board?
If not I doubt I can do any better since my H-cap is falling.
Rick
|
| 1130.129 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Tue Jul 09 1991 09:09 | 37 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Net Randi Rost -Cal US 81-25=26 -16
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45-49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Bob Mook - US 33 -3
John McDermott -Gal Ire 32 -3 (par35)
Net Paul Eno -NH US 36-10=26 -9 (par35)
Stu Osborne - US 40-14=26 -9 (par35)
Randi Rost -Cal US 39-12=27 -9
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35-33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.130 | Does this work??? | TRACTR::OSBORNE | | Thu Jul 25 1991 13:58 | 9 |
| I'm not sure if this will work here but:
I know for USGA handi-capping 2 consecutive nines can be submitted for
averaging, well, I shot a 40 Tuesday and a 41 Wednesday, two different
nines, for a 81 with a new handi-cap of 26 this nets out to 55. This
was at Green Meadow in Hudson, NH. My personal best ever. No brag
just fact.
Stuart
|
| 1130.131 | USGA does, but we don't - sorry | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Fri Jul 26 1991 07:35 | 12 |
|
Hi Stuart,
Only 18 consecutive and different, holes played the same day can
be entered in the "Best 18" category.
However, you may have a pop at best 9 net? I don't know what
you meant when you said " with my new handicap "... so
if you could post your 9 hole net scores it'll help...
thanks
Walta
|
| 1130.132 | Close, but no cigar | METECH::WARFIELD | Gone Golfing | Sat Aug 03 1991 12:18 | 6 |
| Boy this competition is tough. I just shot a 77 on Stow South from the whites
with a handicap of 14. This is the first time I've ever broken 80 in my life!
Though I shot 39-38 I don't even make the DECworld Open leader board is any
category. My hat goes off to you all.
Larry
|
| 1130.133 | LEADER BOARD- no changes | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon Aug 05 1991 08:27 | 37 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Net Randi Rost -Cal US 81-25=26 -16
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45-49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Bob Mook - US 33 -3
John McDermott -Gal Ire 32 -3 (par35)
Net Paul Eno -NH US 36-10=26 -9 (par35)
Stu Osborne - US 40-14=26 -9 (par35)
Randi Rost -Cal US 39-12=27 -9
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35-33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.134 | LEADER BOARD-fixed a typo | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon Aug 05 1991 08:31 | 37 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Net Randi Rost -Cal US 81-25=56 -16
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45-49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Bob Mook - US 33 -3
John McDermott -Gal Ire 32 -3 (par35)
Net Paul Eno -NH US 36-10=26 -9 (par35)
Stu Osborne - US 40-14=26 -9 (par35)
Randi Rost -Cal US 39-12=27 -9
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35-33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.135 | Double Bogey Blues | TECRUS::DEVERELL | | Wed Aug 14 1991 16:12 | 15 |
| Might as well clutter the best gross 18 until someone
shoots sub-par!
Last Sunday, Aug 11, I double bogied the 18th hole
at Triggs Memorial G.C. in Providence to match my
lifetime best 18 hole score of even par 72.
There I was, standing on the 18th tee, 2 under par
with 5 birdies in hand (my best ever) thinking
of a birdie on the last hole and breaking 70
when all of a sudden the right hand decides
to "get excited" causing the ball to duck-hook
under trees on the right.........the rest is
better left to the imagination.
/Dave
|
| 1130.136 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Thu Aug 15 1991 10:01 | 43 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Dave Deverell -RI US 72 EVEN
Net Randi Rost -Cal US 81-25=56 -16
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45+49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Bob Mook - US 33 -3
John McDermott -Gal Ire 32 -3 (par35)
Net Paul Eno -NH US 36-10=26 -9 (par35)
Stu Osborne - US 40-14=26 -9 (par35)
Randi Rost -Cal US 39-12=27 -9
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35+33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.137 | Net 26 on a par 36 | AKOCOA::DROMANO | Disk Bugs For You! | Fri Aug 16 1991 09:39 | 8 |
| I play in the DEC league on Green Meadows CC in Hudson, NH. I just
shot my best 9 this year with a gross 39 on a par 36 course. With my
13 handicap (for 9, ugh) it gave me a net 26 for 9. Now if I can only
gain some consistency. :-)
Don Romano
GIA M&E IM&T
|
| 1130.138 | LEADER BOARD | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Fri Aug 16 1991 11:00 | 42 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Dave Deverell -RI US 72 EVEN
Net Randi Rost -Cal US 81-25=56 -16
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45+49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Bob Mook - US 33 -3
John McDermott -Gal Ire 32 -3 (par35)
Net Don Romano -NH US 39-13=26 -10
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35+33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
No Entries
|
| 1130.139 | wanna play 18 holes ? | NHASAD::BLAISDELL | Keep an even keel | Fri Aug 16 1991 12:47 | 8 |
|
With Don Romano's entry of -10 for best net for 9, that means
that I've witnessed both the low gross (for 9, Mook's 3 under) and low
net scores this year (to date). I'm better than a rabbit's foot!
Hey, available anytime, anywhere. Just pay my greens fee and you
get a chance at the record book. 8^)
-rick
|
| 1130.140 | It's a deal! | AKOCOA::DROMANO | Disk Bugs For You! | Fri Aug 16 1991 14:12 | 10 |
| re: -1
Hey Rick,
If that's the case then it's a deal!! :-) Do you need forth for
next week? :-) You're going to be a popular person!
Don
|
| 1130.141 | | FSDEV1::LWARE | | Wed Aug 28 1991 10:52 | 18 |
|
My best 2 x 9 this year,
Monoosnock (check my spelling Walter...)
Par 72
Handicap 20
Front 46
Back 44
__
Gross 90
Net 70 -2
-Laura
|
| 1130.142 | LEADER BOARD- 4 months to go! | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Thu Aug 29 1991 08:47 | 41 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Dave Deverell -RI US 72 EVEN
Net Randi Rost -Cal US 81-25=56 -16
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45+49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Bob Mook - US 33 -3
John McDermott -Gal Ire 32 -3 (par35)
Net Don Romano -NH US 39-13=26 -10
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35+33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 46+44=90 +18
Net Laura Ware -Mass US 90-20=70 -2
|
| 1130.143 | see ya next month! | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Fri Aug 30 1991 13:53 | 17 |
|
Hi Everyone,
I will be taking a paternal leave for the month of Sept.
Please update the LEADER board when appropriate....
simply extract the reply with the latest results to a file.dat
then edit the file.dat , and enter the new info. Go back into
notes and reply file.dat ...
have fun;
Walta
|
| 1130.144 | on the chart | MAST::LENEHAN | | Wed Sep 04 1991 13:53 | 10 |
| I think I have the new low on 9X2 net.
At Monoosnock CC (Womens par 72)
shot 49 + 47 = 96
handicap 28
net -1 + -3 = -4
Eunhwa
|
| 1130.145 | LEADER BOARD | MAST::LENEHAN | | Wed Sep 04 1991 14:00 | 41 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Dave Deverell -RI US 72 EVEN
Net Randi Rost -Cal US 81-25=56 -16
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45+49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Bob Mook - US 33 -3
John McDermott -Gal Ire 32 -3 (par35)
Net Don Romano -NH US 39-13=26 -10
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35+33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 46+44=90 +18
Net Eunhwa Lenehan -Mass US 96-28=68 -4
|
| 1130.146 | New Leader Board | MACNAS::SPOMPHRETT | | Tue Sep 10 1991 08:43 | 41 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Ire 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Dave Deverell -RI US 72 EVEN
Net Dermot Hanna -Belfast, Irl 82-26=56 (-17, par73)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45+49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Bob Mook - US 33 -3
John McDermott -Gal Ire 32 -3 (par35)
Net Dermot Hanna -Belfast, Irl 38-13=25 -11
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35+33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 46+44=90 +18
Net Eunhwa Lenehan -Mass US 96-28=68 -4
|
| 1130.147 | LEADER BOARD- 1.5 months to go | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Wed Oct 09 1991 07:50 | 41 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Irl 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Dave Deverell -RI US 72 EVEN
Net Dermot Hanna -Blfst Irl 82-26=56 -17 (par73)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 45+49=94 +23
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Bob Mook - US 33 -3
John McDermott -Gal Irl 32 -3 (par35)
Net Dermot Hanna -Blfst, Irl 38-13=25 -11
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35+33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 46+44=90 +18
Net Eunhwa Lenehan -Mass US 96-28=68 -4
|
| 1130.148 | it's about time | FSDEV::LWARE | | Mon Nov 18 1991 10:09 | 17 |
|
Finally I met my goal for the season of breaking 90.
Now maybe I can put the sticks away...
Falmouth Country Club
Handicap 20
Par Gross Net
Front 35 42 32
Back 37 46 36
___ ___ ___
72 88 68
+16 -4
-Laura
|
| 1130.149 | LEADER BOARD- 2 wks to go! | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon Nov 18 1991 13:13 | 41 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Irl 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Dave Deverell -RI US 72 EVEN
Net Dermot Hanna -Blfst Irl 82-26=56 -17 (par73)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 42+46=88 +16
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Laura Ware -Mass US 88-20=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Bob Mook - US 33 -3
John McDermott -Gal Irl 32 -3 (par35)
Net Dermot Hanna -Blfst, Irl 38-13=25 -11
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35+33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 46+44=90 +18
Net Eunhwa Lenehan -Mass US 96-28=68 -4
|
| 1130.150 | Get your scores in... | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Mon Dec 02 1991 08:53 | 11 |
|
HI Everyone,
The DECGolf World Open is offically over !
I'll wait a couple days to post the finals, in case anyone played
over the vacation and want to post a score.
Walta
|
| 1130.151 | thanks | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Fri Dec 06 1991 10:10 | 20 |
|
HI Everyone,
Congratulations to all the winners ! We really have some great
DEC golfers throughout the world! I want to thank all those
that participated, everything ran very smooth...
In the catagories where there were tied scores, everyone takes
first place.
The 1992 DECgolf World Open will officially begin Jan 1, 1992 and
run until (but not including) December 1, 1992 ... I'll start
a new note for entries.
thanks everyone ,
Walta
|
| 1130.152 | 1992 FINAL STANDINGS | WALTA::LENEHAN | | Fri Dec 06 1991 10:11 | 41 |
| Best 18
------------
Mens
Gross Mike Murphy -Cal US 72 EVEN
Martin O'Grady -Irl 72 EVEN
Dan Stirling -Mass US 72 EVEN
Dave Deverell -RI US 72 EVEN
Net Dermot Hanna -Blfst Irl 82-26=56 -17 (par73)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 42+46=88 +16
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 104-36=68 -4
Laura Ware -Mass US 88-20=68 -4
Best 9
-------------
Mens
Gross Bob Mook - US 33 -3
John McDermott -Gal Irl 32 -3 (par35)
Net Dermot Hanna -Blfst, Irl 38-13=25 -11
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 43 +7
Net Lindalee Cummings -Cal US 50-18=32 -5 (par37)
Best 9 x 2
---------------
Mens
Gross Walter Lenehan -Mass US 35+33=68 -2 (par70)
Net Paul Eno -Mass US 79-21=58 -12 (par70)
Womens
Gross Laura Ware -Mass US 46+44=90 +18
Net Eunhwa Lenehan -Mass US 96-28=68 -4
|