| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 54.1 | Simple is better! | RUBY::CORBETT | Mike Corbett | Wed Dec 10 1986 21:55 | 14 | 
|  |     
    
    It was great, Could you imagine having one-hundred thousand dollars
    riding on a putt? What pressure!
    
    I liked it more then regular tournaments becuase you knew exaclty
    where everything stood. It was simple. NO jumping to the 18th to
    see Bob, and back to twelve to see John, then back to 17th... Then
    trying to figure out, well if he gets two biries, then hell need
    to bridie his last five plus get an eagle....
    
    Mike
    
    
 | 
| 54.2 | pressure, what pressure? | KAOS02::W_HAMMEL | Don't get mad, get SETPRV! | Thu Dec 11 1986 14:14 | 23 | 
|  | .1>    It was great, Could you imagine having one-hundred thousand dollars
.1>    riding on a putt? What pressure!
    
    for you or me, yes.  for trevino, zoeller, palmer and nicklaus,
    not likely.  all four of those gentlemen will not have any money
    worries for the next several lifetimes.  sure, 100K riding on a
    putt is a big number, but i don't think any of them would (should?)
    have been worring about it.
    
    like trevino has said, putting for big money on the tour is nothing.
    putting to win a $50 naussa when you've only got $10 in your pocket
    is another thing entirely.
    
    i did enjoy the show.  it is nice to see several big names go
    head-to-head rather than the usual tournament format.  the only
    thing that bugged me was that they chopped out a couple of holes
    (15, 16 i think?) from the telecast, because "nothing happened"
    as an announcer put it.  did that happen everywhere, or was it just
    done by the canadian network who showed it to us?
    
    maury...
    
    
 | 
| 54.3 |  | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ |  | Thu Dec 11 1986 14:29 | 16 | 
|  |      
     The format was fine; it's especially good to see someone play an
     entire hole, as opposed to just the approach shot and putting. It's
     also a lot more interesting to watch golfers competing head-to-head
     and not in different groups.
     
     On the other hand, the number of commercials was distracting, and
     there just weren't very many golf shots shown.  Also, the show
     sometimes seemed more of a personality-type exhibition than a golf
     exhibition.
     
     My vote is for more match play competition on TV, with more emphasis
     on the golf than on the (often forced) conversations that the golfers
     are having amongst themselves.
     
     --Mr Topaz 
 | 
| 54.4 | Use their own money! | ECCLES::T402U5 | Mr. Litby on training in the UK | Thu Dec 11 1986 16:36 | 9 | 
|  |     I think the players in the 'Skins Game' should have to put up their
    own money. They could certainly afford it. The whole thing would
    be much more fun if their own money was at stake.
    
    Actually, I think I read somewhere that Lee Trevino had suggested
    exactly that - it would be just like him...
    -- Mr Litby
    
 | 
| 54.5 |  | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ |  | Thu Dec 11 1986 18:23 | 7 | 
|  |      re .4 ("Mr. Litby on training in the UK"):
     
     Mr Litby is, I trust, at the St Andrews Training Centre, learning
     escape sequences from 15-foot bunkers, mid-fairway gourse, and the
     winds.
     
     --Mr Topaz 
 | 
| 54.6 | Keep it personal | BCSE::SPT_BRINKLEY |  | Thu Dec 11 1986 20:32 | 19 | 
|  |     Personally I prefer the informal chit chat that was shown. This
    was one time when 4 guys (very talented golfers) went out and played
    around together. Since it wasn't their money or a real PGA event
    I feel they were a little looser and talked a little more than normal.
    If this was a match play event I'd doubt you'd see the personalities
    coming forth.
    
    To me at least, it made the event a little more interesting. Can
    you imagine Arnie's grief if Fuzzy hadn't made that last putt and
    he would have tied had he not picked up? I'm probably mistaken but
    it sounds like that would have been cut if you were the producer.
    Would you have also cut Jack asking Arnie if he wanted to mark the
    putt or finish?
    
    Personalities and good golf ARE the skins game. That's what makes
    it interesting.
    
    Roger
    
 | 
| 54.7 | Fun Once | ODIXIE::LIVENGOOD |  | Fri Dec 19 1986 01:05 | 8 | 
|  |     			-< Fun Once a Year >-
    
    Yes, the skins game was fun to watch. I agree, however, with .4
    in that the players should at least put up *some* money. Also, it
    seems a shame that Jack shot a 70 on that incredible course and
    got nothing.  
    
    Donald (a new comer to notes, much less GOLF notes)
 | 
| 54.8 | they should foot their own bill | VINO::RASPUZZI | Michael Raspuzzi | Tue Feb 10 1987 19:56 | 5 | 
|  |     I have to agree with .4. I think the players should put up the money
    themselves. It would make the skins game a heck of lot more
    interesting.
    
    Mike
 |