| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 2462.1 | Finally! | PAULJ::HARRIMAN | Deb in Air | Mon Oct 01 1990 15:21 | 11 | 
|  | 
	They were at the AES convention in NYC earlier this year. I have
	a bunch of literature from them. I've been waiting for them to actually
	market the stuff. I'll go home and see if I can dig it up. The 9002
	was the only working prototype they had at the time, and it was
	vaporware until you posted your note. There were some other rackmount
	things they were planning on introducing, but I can't recall what they
	were right now.
	/pjh
 | 
| 2462.2 |  | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | The sea refuses no river.... | Tue Oct 02 1990 10:36 | 12 | 
|  | re: vaporware
My local dealer has had them over well over a month.
nice toy, expensive, a bit noisy but a nice toy. I couldn't imagine actually 
using one on stage though...especially with their itty-bitty "finger switch"
rig.
their 4 seperate/independant digital processors in one box rig is nice 
also...but pricy at $1700 list...
dbii
 | 
| 2462.3 | One Man's Band... | RANGER::ROBERT |  | Tue Oct 02 1990 15:02 | 14 | 
|  |     
    Hmm, I didn't find it "expensive" considering all it gives you in a
    small convient package.  In fact, the EM reivew commented on it's
    cost effectiveness.  But I suppose it's subjective.  True, it is a
    bit noisy on certain effects and could be clumsy on stage.  I'll have
    to see how that works out.
    
    There is an add in Keyboard for their new rack-mount unit the last
    reply mentioned, it's called the Zoom 9010.  Nice concept of having
    seperate independent FX processors in one unit, but to me $1700 IS
    expensive!
    
    -Tom
    
 | 
| 2462.4 | Zoom 9002 endorsement; question | MAIL::EATOND |  | Sun Oct 28 1990 17:14 | 20 | 
|  |     	I really like my Zoom 9002!  I picked it up used (!) at a local
    store and have found no more need for anything else for guitar (well, I
    *am* saving a Rat pedal, just for backup).  It is not as noisy as the
    Rockman X100, and a lot more versatile.  (I was never quite content
    with the distortion sound on the X100, and you couldn't alter it beyond
    limiting the level of the signal you drove into it).  
    
    	Here's a general question for y'all (hey, I did move south,
    y'know)...  Using the Zoom 9002 to give my electric guitar distortion,
    it sounds just fine straight into my PA system.  But if I plug the Rat
    pedal in line (minus the Zoom) into the board to handle distortion
    (i.e., my backup system), I get what sounds like a blown speaker, 
    particularly in the hi-end (this is a bi-amped system).  Now I know the 
    Zoom gizmo has a speaker emulator filter to make it sound like a guitar 
    amp is miked into the PA, but that shouldn't account for the Rat pedal 
    causing the PA to break up.  There's no clipping going on on the board, 
    either.  It seems that its just not a good combination.  Any ideas?
    
    	Dan
    
 | 
| 2462.5 | You Really Got Me | KEYS::MOELLER | Silopsism's not for everyone | Mon Oct 29 1990 13:54 | 9 | 
|  |     Dan,
    
    I'd think that the Rat pedal is further amplifying the signal, causing
    breakup, but:
    
    >causing the PA to break up.  There's no clipping going on on the board, 
    >either.  
    
    I take it the Rat pedal is clean by itself..
 | 
| 2462.6 | Time to spend more money? | STLACT::EATON |  | Fri Nov 02 1990 11:19 | 9 | 
|  |     	Just getting back from beautiful Colorado....
    
    	I don't know what's up, either.  At first I thought I was blowing
    my high-frequency driver.  But it seems to work fine on most other
    signals.  The other day I tried a distortion guitar patch on one of my
    keyboards, and it seemed to do a similar thing with the high-freq
    driver.  Maybe it *is* on its way out?
    
    	Dan
 |