| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1017.1 | I'll look up the promo sheet, too | AKOV68::EATOND |  | Thu Nov 19 1987 08:48 | 26 | 
|  | >    1.) What is the rack mount version of the Alpha Juno called?
	The MKS-50.
    
>    2.) Any idea how much it is going for these days?
	I don't know the new price, but I've seen them for no lower than $595
in the Want-ads.  My guess would be they are around $700-$800 new.
    
>    3.) How compatible are the voice parameters?  
	While many of the parameters are the same, I believe there is a whole
new technology involved in the alpha line.  Didn't someone around here say 
they're using SAS technology on these as well as on the digital pianos?  I'm
not sure how that would be done, since the alpha junos have a definate 'analog' 
sound, but...
	Some of the differences I have noticed: There are different wave-forms
available, not just the standard saw, pulse...  The envelopes are also more
advanced.  I believe they add a few stages on these.
	So, to answer the question, no, you couldn't dump a juno librarion to 
the MKS-50.  It appears to me that they tried to make them look simliar, but
they are definately not identical.  You'll have to start from scratch, using
your 106's patches only as guides.
	Dan
 | 
| 1017.2 | Just found it... | AKOV68::EATOND |  | Thu Nov 19 1987 09:04 | 17 | 
|  | 	I just found the sheet on the Alpha Junos (couldn't find anything on the
MKS).  I see no mention of SAS, but they mention LSI (whatever that means) which
enables these to produce 14 different waveforms.  The chart on the page actually
divides the waveforms into 3 categories 1) Sawtooth-type waveforms, 2) pulse-
type waveforms, and 3) sub-oscilator waveforms (which, like the 106, are square
waves).  These 3 categories and the 14 type waveforms are combined into 5 
possible combinations to choose from.
	The envelope adds, as I said before, one extra stage.  This seems to be
becoming a common practice (Korg, ESQ-1, ...).  This step allows for either 
another 'angle' by which the decay can change to, or can be used to cause a
repeat attack or simulate a slap-back or echo.
	The Alphas also support velocity sensitivity and after-touch, which the
106, of course, doesn't.  It's not clear how flexible these may be routed.
	Dan
 | 
| 1017.3 | Large Scale Integration | GCLEF::COHEN | Richard Cohen | Thu Nov 19 1987 09:15 | 7 | 
|  |     LSI usually means "Large Scale Integration", which is when they
    pack what used to take many chips into a few custom chips. Maybe
    the Juno-106 used more discrete ICs and now they have reduced it
    to a few LSI chips.
    
    	- Rick
    
 | 
| 1017.4 | Thanks... | CLULES::SPEED | Worksystems: at the bleeding edge... | Thu Nov 19 1987 09:24 | 7 | 
|  |     Dan,
    
    Thanks for your diligent efforts.  Looks like I'm relatively hosed.
    
    Oh well...
    
    		Derek
 | 
| 1017.5 | Boy, what resignation. | MAY20::BAILEY | Steph Bailey | Thu Nov 19 1987 13:57 | 39 | 
|  |     Relax, mon.
    
    I have an MKS-50.  I got it for $470.  (I'm sure that was rock bottom).
    It is a SINGLE height rack-mount unit (its size is one of its best
    features) with stereo outs.
    
    The voice parameters are very similar (almost identical) to those
    of the Juno-106.  They are identical to those of the alphas.  The
    differences are usually superset: an extra envelope parameter,
    parameters for velocity and pressure sensitivity, fully variable
    chorus time (instead of two preset values), etc..
    
    With only minor approximation you should be able to use your 106
    voices (but you will have to ``type them in'' as opposed to dumping
    them across MIDI).
    
    The box is solid and useful enough, but personally I wouldn't recommend
    it.  The voicing architecture isn't really very flexible, with a
    single envelope, and a single oscillator (albeit you can mix ``sub
    osc'' ``pulse'' and ``square'' wave-forms), and a single sinusoidal
    LFO.  In other words, most of the bright (timbrally) patches sound
    the same.
    
    But if you have a 106, I'm sure you know all about this already.
    
    I would suggest a Matrix 6R for flexibility.  But the 6R should
    be a bit more expensive, and it is a honkin' triple high rack mount.
    You could probably adapt your ``essential voices'' to the 6R
    architecture without too much difficulty (this subtractative stuff
    is all the same).
    
    I would suggest calling Sam Ash to get a current competative price
    on either of these units.
    
    If you want to play with an MKS-50 (and you are in the greater Maynard
    area), give me a call, or a write.
    
    Steph
        
 |