| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 747.1 | Anticipation.... | EMERLD::DUBE |  | Fri Apr 03 1987 16:34 | 5 | 
|  |     Edd,
    
    Can't wait to see your review of this machine. I'm VERY interested!
    
    -Dan
 | 
| 747.2 | sys-ex? | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Fri Apr 03 1987 17:10 | 2 | 
|  |     Please check to see if it handles system-exclusive.
        John Sauter
 | 
| 747.3 | At least I did the dbx thing.... | JAWS::COTE | Hunting the dread moray eel... | Mon Apr 06 1987 08:35 | 12 | 
|  |     I didn't get a chance to play with the QX-5 this weekend.
    
    However, I did find out that...
    
               A.  It does have an 'unmerge' facility.
               B.  It handles sys-ex, and even lets you
                   edit down to the byte level...
    
    I've got this month's AfterTouch with me if anyone wants to
    know more...
    
    Edd
 | 
| 747.4 | oh boy! ........maybe | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Mon Apr 06 1987 22:00 | 19 | 
|  |     
    uh huh:
    	
     Can you define macros that can be used to assemble Z80 code?
    
     Does it allow 'Zappa-esque' time signatures?
    
     Every measure? 
     And, of course, how many watts does it draw when making toast?
     nevermind. I want one.
    
    (I read the article too....and cant see >$1100 for Mc500....)
    
    You can always dump/load to/from a cheep computer instead of tape....
    {pant,slobber, drool} Just gotta see one to make sure.
        
 | 
| 747.5 | Yamara ra ra | MINDER::KENT |  | Tue Apr 07 1987 03:49 | 25 | 
|  |     
    I've had my QX5 for about 4 months now and have to say it meets
    all my unsophisticated requirements. I bought it on a deal from
    my store on the basis I would give it back when their new version
    of the CX5 sequencer was produced. This is now 5 months late and
    I don't think the QX will ever leave my studio.
    
    It sits neatly on top of the KX88 which is an important consideration
    because I can do all my sequencing siotting at the one stool without
    reaching for a keyboard of peering at a monitor. I have found the
    micro-edit facilities really useful expecially for editing patch
    changes through a piece. I have never used up enough memory to require
    the use of the macro's but these are usefull places to store backups
    of a track. It sync's to tape. ALthough I am yet to use this feature.
    It remember's everything you did everytime you turn the machine
    off so I only have to dump to tape when I have completed a sonmg
    and want to store it for posterity. I can also store the sys-ex
    messages from my drum machine. So I can store the drum data and
    the song data on the same file. But this is a sloooow process. About
    4 minutes I guess. But 4 minutes after each song isn't to bad. 
    
    Any questions ?
    
    			Paul.
    
 | 
| 747.6 | Song position pointer??? | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Tue Apr 07 1987 08:59 | 9 | 
|  |     
    It does sound good.....
    
    what deficiencies,nits, or kludges have you noticed? Can
    you say something about your 'recording technique' with
    the beast....
    
    ron
    
 | 
| 747.7 | And my RX21 fits nicely on top!!!! | DARTS::COTE | 1110 1101 1101 | Tue Apr 07 1987 09:34 | 9 | 
|  |     One caveat. The QX is *hardware* based. You live with any bugs
    and weirdisms. The MC is *software* based, allowing you at least
    a shot at getting things fixed...
    
    But still, 600 beans for a disc drive?
    
    You realize this calls for an in-depth comparison.....
    
    Edd
 | 
| 747.8 | CQ CQ CQ | MINDER::KENT |  | Tue Apr 07 1987 10:41 | 19 | 
|  |     
           re -2
    
    In terms of my usage of the QX (without wanting to sound smart).
    I turn in on press the record, play a bit turn it off, and press the
    play and it plays. It really is simple. I have found no KLUGES as
    yet. It does implement song position pointers and it even has a
    delay built into the start to allow other slower devices to catch
    up. Unfortunately this delay. (up to 999 msecs. Is that a second
    ?), is not slow enough for the DDD-1 once we get past about measure
    78. Can anyone think why this should be ? This isn't to much of
    a problem as the delay required can be handled manually.
                                        
    I have no problems with the machine at yet. I thought about the
    disc drive but decided that unless I was going to play live, in
    which case the Yamaha drive would be to slow, I wouldn't need it.
    
    
    				Paul
 | 
| 747.9 | ok, pass the macro... | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Tue Apr 07 1987 18:49 | 22 | 
|  |     macros macros! you gotta start using them.
    
    they are like reusable sections of music. You actually put a
    "hey_go_play_Macro_n" on the track instead of the whole section.
    result: save lotsa memory! Say you have ABACAB (original,no?)
    make each section a macro. Insead of copying the repeating sections
    entirely event for event on to the track WHERE they repeat, thus
    using up valuable memory, the "go to macro_n" flag takes up well,
    lots less, eh? 
    
    So for you ELP fans trying ABCABDABEFFAGACCAHBCDEFFAGACCAHAIJK....
    kinda tunes (you *are* out there arent you?) well, you have a chance
    to fit it in.....
    
    q: Tape save takes 4 mins. Does tape load?
    q: Does it save/load via system exclusive too? 
    
    q: Anyone heard a better price than $495? where?
    
    ron
         
 | 
| 747.10 |  | GIBSON::DICKENS | Distributed System Manglement | Thu Apr 09 1987 13:45 | 1 | 
|  |     H?
 | 
| 747.11 | Macro 4/4 | MINDER::KENT |  | Fri Apr 10 1987 09:18 | 9 | 
|  |     
    The tape load takes about the same time as the save. The deciding
    factor being the resollution of the tape I guess. The only reason
    I haven't used the Macros yet is that I haven't found it nescessary.
    I have used all the other features and can't find any problems.
    Even some of the ones mentioned in Keyboard are non-problems once
    you know the machine.
    
    					Paul.f
 | 
| 747.12 | question | LOLITA::DIORIO |  | Thu Apr 23 1987 09:03 | 2 | 
|  |     How does the QX-5 compare to the Korg SQD-1?
    
 | 
| 747.13 | No Comparison | DRUMS::FEHSKENS |  | Thu Apr 23 1987 09:27 | 5 | 
|  |     I have heard nothing but good things about the QX-5, and nothing
    but bad things about the SQD-1.
    
    len (who loves his MC500).
    
 | 
| 747.14 | there goes my tax refund | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Thu Apr 23 1987 11:18 | 11 | 
|  |     
    	Took the plunge. 
    
    	Ordered a QX5..........$430 shipping included.
    
    	{pant,slobber,drool}
    
    	Plan to hear good things bout it.
    
        ron
    
 | 
| 747.15 | One born every minute... | JAWS::COTE | Fishheads. Eat them up, yum!! | Thu Apr 23 1987 11:32 | 7 | 
|  |     HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!       It worked!!!!
    
    April fool, wackin' juan!!! The QX5 is crap-ola!!!!
    
    ;^)
    
    Edd (l'jealousmente el largo tempo!!)
 | 
| 747.16 | we talkin' bro.  pass my tutu | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Thu Apr 23 1987 19:06 | 7 | 
|  |     
    	eh? Yo hey el dorito de la diablo y mucho caliente de cabasa, gringo.
    	ronaldo ( Largemente de bulge des shorts toute suite)
        
    	    
 | 
| 747.17 | let's you and him fight... | 16514::MOELLER | we be jammin'/you be illin' | Thu Apr 23 1987 19:13 | 3 | 
|  |     Ron: you call Edd a "muhado".
    
    Edd: you call Ron a "fituzo".
 | 
| 747.18 | What Channel Are You Guys On? | DRUMS::FEHSKENS |  | Fri Apr 24 1987 10:36 | 5 | 
|  |     Just which manufacturer code do all these system exclusive messages
    belong to?
    
    len.
    
 | 
| 747.19 | oops..... | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Fri Apr 24 1987 12:27 | 8 | 
|  |     
    Oh gee. I forgot to apply for a manufacturer's ID Midi code byte
    for the new business...
    
    Hey, anyone know how and howmuch it costs or who you have to know...
    
	ron
        
 | 
| 747.20 |  | ECADSR::SHERMAN | How much help you think Ah need? | Fri Apr 24 1987 16:47 | 6 | 
|  | 
    Why not just choose any number above 4B?  That's as high as they
    go as of Jan. 1, 1987, and besides, *you* aren't going to sell enough
    stuff to create a problem, anyway, are you? ;-)
    
    Steve
 |