| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 383.1 | Minnow-mouth? | MENTOR::COTE | High in The Custerdome... | Tue Jun 10 1986 12:11 | 8 |
|
MAIL IT NOW!!!!
We await it's arrival with bait on our breath!!!!
Edd
|
| 383.2 | Might as well mail tape 1 | BIZET::ARNOLD | John E. Arnold | Tue Jun 10 1986 12:54 | 4 |
| Mailing it now would at least get us started. That sounds like a
reasonable thing to do.
- John -
|
| 383.3 | Defer your pleasure like adults! | CANYON::MOELLER | Swap 'til you Drop | Tue Jun 10 1986 13:00 | 11 |
| I think it would be a real bear to track where each of the now TWO
tapes is, and who gets which tape next...
We've waited a while, and I would rather get both tapes together
than post 'listening reviews' of Tape A, and read the 'liner notes'
of only tape A... then go thru the whole process again for tape
B. Incredible confusion unless we go to a parallel topics scheme...
I vote WAIT.
karl moeller
|
| 383.4 | more input needed | BARNUM::RHODES | | Tue Jun 10 1986 16:33 | 14 |
|
Is the deck gonna be fixed in the next few weeks for sure? If a
new part needs to be ordered, could repair potentially be delayed
even longer?
If there are gonna be further delays, we might as well pass around
the first tape. If it looks like a definite fix within two weeks
or so, we might as well wait.
Any guess as to how long the wait will be?
Todd who_has_anxious_ears_too.
|
| 383.5 | Conditional NOW | DSSDEV::SAUTER | John Sauter | Tue Jun 10 1986 16:44 | 4 |
| If the deck is not likely to be fixed before the first tape
finishs making its rounds, I suggest sending the first tape
out now.
John Sauter
|
| 383.6 | Roll 'em... | JUNIOR::DREHER | | Tue Jun 10 1986 17:30 | 6 |
| Let's get the ball rolling...SHIP!
Brad, maybe you could list the contents of the first tape to
whet our appetites...;^)
DD
|
| 383.7 | yeah, yeahyeahyeah | MENTOR::COTE | High in The Custerdome... | Tue Jun 10 1986 18:27 | 3 |
| I second DD's motion...
Edd
|
| 383.8 | Only 6 of you care? | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad (aka Dr. Fingers) | Thu Jun 12 1986 10:05 | 10 |
| Any other opinions? If not, I'll go ahead and assemble (compile?) the
liner notes and get MASTER1.1 ready to ship. MASTER1.2 will ship after
I get my tape deck back and Dennis finally gets me his tape 8-).
I do wonder, though, how we'll work the logisitics of this. Perhaps we
should have a note dedicated to tape reception - i.e., "I got the
master today", or "I mailed the master to ____ today" so we can track
the stuff. Never trust the mail.
8^)
|
| 383.9 | Suggestion | STAR::MALIK | Karl Malik | Thu Jun 12 1986 10:52 | 15 |
|
A note dedicated to tracking sounds like a good idea. Could
even contain reviews.
Sort of like 'I received Tape 1 in the mail today. I haven't
had a chance to listen to it yet.' Next entry 'I listened to
side one tonight. It's wonderful, especially John Smith's duet
for accordian and sitar.' Etc. 'Ok, I packed up the tape and
sent it to Mary Jones.'
A running log like this would make it clear where the tape was
and what was happening. Perhaps there should be one note per tape
so as to avoid the confusion of multi-threading?
,Karl Malik
|
| 383.10 | Three suggestions | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Thu Jun 12 1986 13:42 | 17 |
| Ship it! (Send out the first tape, I mean.)
Run one note per tape to track it.
Run one note per tape for comments/reviews/assaults/etc., don't
mix "Where is it?" with "What'd you think of it" - the former is
fact, the latter opinion and subject to all the thrills of noterdom
opinion-mongering. We'll never be able to figure out where the
tape is once the "discussions" of content get started.
In particular, I expect to copy the tape as soon as I get it so
as to get it on the road again as soon as possible, and that'll
give me more time to "savor" it and provide some better than "shot
from the hip" comments.
len.
|
| 383.11 | I second the notion | BARNUM::RHODES | | Thu Jun 12 1986 16:34 | 4 |
| Amen. I agree 100% with .-1
Todd.
|