| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 764.3 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Sick in balanced sort of way | Fri Nov 26 1993 15:31 | 5 |
| You're new around aren't you?
Read the Sarnia topic and relax.
hope this helps.
|
| 764.5 | | TROOA::DZIALOWSKI | | Fri Nov 26 1993 16:14 | 1 |
| No problem.
|
| 764.6 | smiley in .1 | KUTIPS::LACAILLE | Half-filled bottles of inspiration | Fri Nov 26 1993 16:18 | 11 |
|
It was definitely an implied smiley...after all this is the
Canada conference not Soapbox or one of those other volatile
conferences.
Even if it isn't a smiley, who cares, extra points on the
blood pressure scale only serve to ruins ones kidneys.
Effervessantly Yours,
Mr doM
|
| 764.7 | BTW | KUTIPS::LACAILLE | Half-filled bottles of inspiration | Fri Nov 26 1993 16:23 | 11 |
|
There is no problem with KAOSWS, we simply do not like any
of the CTH nodes, so we renamed them all in our DECnet node
database...
Mr System Mangler
ps Sorry... :-/
pps No major problem, just an out of date DECnet entry, we'll
look at updating it...Charlie
|
| 764.8 | TROZ02 == 62.303 | KUTIPS::LACAILLE | Half-filled bottles of inspiration | Fri Nov 26 1993 16:28 | 5 |
|
I do not see a problem on KAOSWS....what is your DECnet node
address supposed to be???
Charlie
|
| 764.9 | | CSC32::S_BROOK | There and back to see how far it is | Mon Nov 29 1993 12:51 | 7 |
| Looks like there is definitely some confusion on the correct DECnet
addresses for Ricardo's node and TROZ02. Ricardo ... if YOUR node
address is also supposed to be 62.303 like TROZ02, then send mail to
REGISTRAR @TRO where, I believe it's Justina Chan who will sort it out.
Stuart
|
| 764.10 | | CTHP12::M_MORIN | A dead man with the most toys is still a dead man. | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:47 | 16 |
| He's off today but I can tell you this.
He entered his note from Conferencing on the PC and it showed up as you see
in in .0
His PC address is 57.489 (CTHP25)
Why did it show up as TROZ02?
I deducted from that that KAOSWS didn't have TROZ02 setup right in it's
DECnet database.
Sorry if we're off-topic here.
/Mario
|
| 764.11 | Fixed | KUTIPS::LACAILLE | Half-filled bottles of inspiration | Mon Nov 29 1993 15:15 | 11 |
|
An NCP list of both nodes on SWS showed the correct addresses
but the volitile database still showed the old addresses. The
process for updating the volitile database after the full
DECnet database is pulled in must be broken, we are looking into
it.
For now though, R_OBAS' node will now work...
Charlie
|
| 764.12 | | CSC32::S_BROOK | There and back to see how far it is | Mon Nov 29 1993 15:35 | 6 |
| Well, at least this part is fixed ... there are still some node
name / address problems with area 62 appearing to be assigned twice.
We're working on that!
Stuart
|
| 764.13 | | CSC32::S_BROOK | There and back to see how far it is | Mon Nov 29 1993 16:40 | 24 |
| OK, the mystery is solved ...
Area 62 is a "hidden area" ... thus nodes in it are only known within
certain geographic areas. Often hidden nodes are hidden behind a
single router node ... which is when you see node names like
TROZ02::TROA02::
But in this case, the TROZ02 node is fully known throughout Canada,
but is hidden from other countries ... vis from the USA.
So if I do an NCP SHO NOD TROZ02 on CSC32:: here in Colorado, I get
an unknown node, but if I tell KAOSWS to show me TROZ02 I get another
node. DECnet messages for hidden area nodes like this are not passed
across the bridge between Canada and the US.
So, the only glitch here was a problem with the volatile nodes
database on KAOSWS.
Thanks for sorting this out Charlie ... and setting me straight
on how the Canadian hidden nodes were set up.
Stuart
|
| 764.14 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Sick in balanced sort of way | Mon Nov 29 1993 17:36 | 5 |
| What an astounding insight into the central paradoxes of the human
condition, and of our indefatigable facility for creating adaptive
rationales to account for it! Good god!
Glenn
|
| 764.15 | re last | KUTIPS::LACAILLE | Half-filled bottles of inspiration | Tue Nov 30 1993 15:45 | 2 |
|
Balanced in a sick sort of way.... ;-)
|