| Title: | Digital Brouters Conference | 
| Notice: | New common-code brouter family: RouteAbout, DECswitch 900 | 
| Moderator: | MARVIN::HART LL | 
| Created: | Mon Jul 17 1995 | 
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 929 | 
| Total number of notes: | 3736 | 
    hello
    I need to use a routeabout as a rouetr for cluster alias in a phase V 
    environnement.I've heard of problems .Does anybody know if it is ok
    with one of the last version v2.0.3
    Thanks
    Lionel 
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 899.1 | Worked for me... | FOUNDR::FOX | David B. Fox -- DTN 285-2091 | Wed May 14 1997 10:15 | 14 | 
|     Lionel,
    	I did the Cluster Alias testing in the last round of METEOR
    testing.  I haven't tested the post-SSB kits as I'm now doing
    VNswitch testing.
    
    	Based on my experience with METEOR, it was working fine with Phase
    V VMSclusters.  Phase IV clusters require at least one cluster member to 
    have full function routing enabled in DECnet.
    
    	I can check with the METEOR/ASTEROID testing project leader to see
    if the team has noted any differences from my experience with the FCS
    image.
    
    	David
 | |||||
| 899.2 | Bug will be fixed soon... | DAVIDF::FOX | David B. Fox -- DTN 285-2091 | Wed May 14 1997 11:56 | 7 | 
|     This note was also entered into the DECnet-OSI conference #3962.
    
    The bug discussed there from an IPMT case is apparently going to be
    fixed in an upcoming fix kit.  Stay tuned.
    
    	David
    
 | |||||