| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 9564.1 |  | SMURF::KNIGHT | Fred Knight | Tue Apr 22 1997 14:35 | 14 | 
|  | Thats what happens when you buy a NON-SUPPORTED device
that violates the scsi spec.
The scsi-2 spec clearly states that the lun field is
a 3 bit field.  So, I'm not sure how you can have any
lun number greater than 7 (atleast I can't think of
how to do it).
If other vendors drivers also violate the scsi-2 spec,
then so be it.  We however comply with the standard and
will work correctly with devices that also comply with
the standard.
	Fred Knight
 | 
| 9564.2 |  | NABETH::alan | Dr. File System's Home for Wayward Inodes. | Tue Apr 22 1997 17:47 | 4 | 
|  | 	Ah, but would it violate the spec (such as it is) if the device
	where claiming to be SCSI-3?  SCSI-2 was as solid as quick-sand
	when vendors started claiming "compliance".  Why should they do
	any differently for SCSI-3...
 | 
| 9564.3 | Boxhill & scsi compliance | SIOG::BR_MURPHY |  | Wed Apr 23 1997 04:25 | 18 | 
|  |     Re 9564.1
    
    Hey!! Don't blame me for buying this stuff. I was just responding to a
    call & found it already installed.
    
    Actually, I don't believe it's a none standard scsi2-spec. I think it
    complies very well with the spec. I think the real problem is that the
    VAR's who sold it & installed it don't really know how to configure it.
    I was hoping there was someone out there who could help me sort out the
    correct configuration...or point me in the right direction for further
    information.
    
    Re 9564.2
    
    SCSI-3? Why what does the scsi3 spec have to say about LUNS, & does
    Digital supply scsi cards that conform to this standard....& are
    compatible with AS4100 running DU3.2G
    
 | 
| 9564.4 |  | NABETH::alan | Dr. File System's Home for Wayward Inodes. | Wed Apr 23 1997 17:36 | 5 | 
|  | 	I'm lead to believe that SCSI-3 increases the number of logical
	units that a target can have.  I don't know if support for this
	particular feature requires new adapters or just drivers and
	supporting host software.� I'm also lead to believe that a
	future version of Digital UNIX will be more SCSI-3 friendly.
 | 
| 9564.5 |  | DECWET::RWALKER | Roger Walker - Media Changers | Tue Apr 29 1997 19:28 | 12 | 
|  | 	SCSI-2, the current spec, limits the LUN to 3 bits in
	the IDENTIFY message.  This only allows a LUN range of
	0-7.  While SCSI-3 is being drafted some vendors are using
	some of its featues and some even report SCSI-3 in the
	inquire data.  Why wait for a standard to finish if it
	has good stuff, we couldn't for real time POSIX.
	To use of the SCSI-3 LUN range requires all parts of the system
	to change.  Even if you could get an adapter that works
	it doesn't fix the O/S.  We almost had it for 4.0 but oh well.
	Until all software can live without the /dev/rz5c format
	we just have to do without more LUNS.
 | 
| 9564.6 |  | SMURF::KNIGHT | Fred Knight | Wed Apr 30 1997 16:32 | 9 | 
|  | The SCSI-3 lun field is 8 bytes in length.  So yes, it
requires not only new S/W, but new H/W as well!
Also, any device that uses less than 8 bytes for the
lun field is NOT SCSI-3.  And any device that uses more
than 3 bits is NOT SCSI-2.  So, if it's not SCSI-2, and
it's not SCSI-3, .....
	Fred Knight
 |