| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 2617.1 | Hazard a guess. | KERNEL::BURDENI |  | Wed Apr 16 1997 17:12 | 5 | 
|  |     Apologies for pushing this, but would anyone like to hazard a guess, or
    is more information required.
    
    Cheers
    Ivan
 | 
| 2617.2 | Lack of memory, not just ignoring you! | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Thu Apr 17 1997 08:59 | 4 | 
|  |     I've got a vague feeling that we closed a loophole like that in V3.2.
    
    What exactly is the format of the address they are using, and what
    PROFILE flags does the user have? Only PRVSUB and PRVSUP matter.
 | 
| 2617.3 | Mail addresses. | KERNEL::BURDENI |  | Tue Apr 29 1997 14:52 | 10 | 
|  |     The address format is as follows :
    
    All ALL-IN-1 users on this node 	(SUBSCRIBERS:)
    Remote Addressee			(SUBSCRIBERS: @A1@DUBREG)
    Remote Addressee			(SUBSCRIBERS: @A1@DUNDLK)
    Etc
    Etc
    
    The mail will not be sent to the local users, but will be sent to the
    remote user.
 | 
| 2617.4 | 3.2 doesn't have the problem | GIDDAY::BACOT |  | Wed Apr 30 1997 00:39 | 7 | 
|  |     
    I think Graham is correct.  I remember this problem being reported 
    against 3.1 but it doesn't happen on 3.2
    
    angela
    
    
 |