| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 2475.1 | Let me add to the rumor mill | AIMTEC::ZANIEWSKI_D | Taking bids on Andrew's Alphatraz cell | Wed Jan 22 1997 14:07 | 9 |
| 2475.2 | I can do rumours too! | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Wed Jan 22 1997 14:29 | 7 |
| 2475.3 | ALL details.... | UTRTSC::SMEETS | Workgroup support | Wed Jan 22 1997 14:39 | 82 |
| 2475.4 | | ZUR01::ASHG | Grahame Ash @RLE | Wed Jan 22 1997 15:47 | 5 |
| 2475.5 | | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Thu Jan 23 1997 08:02 | 5 |
| 2475.6 | TCP/IP & NEW MAIL NOTIFICATION | TAGEIN::SCHOEN | | Thu Jan 23 1997 08:18 | 11 |
| 2475.7 | Doesn't ALL-IN-1 uses the same mechanism | UTRTSC::SMEETS | Workgroup support | Thu Jan 23 1997 10:41 | 15 |
| 2475.8 | | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Thu Jan 23 1997 14:05 | 17 |
| 2475.9 | not only MailWorks | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | Ajax: World Champions 1995 | Fri Jan 24 1997 06:47 | 10 |
| Hi,
The site where Martin referenced to had problems with MailWorks,
SQL-net (Oracle) and Russell Calendar manager after upgrading
to UCX 4.1. All related to the failing gethostbyname (QIO).
Cheers,
Jan
|
| 2475.10 | | IOSG::REESA | Arfon Rees (REO2 F/L9 DTN: 830 6028) | Fri Jan 24 1997 09:48 | 11 |
| The Australian site does NOT have MailWorks and had problems starting
ALL-IN-1 AIDA and FCS servers over IP after upgrading to UCX 4.1.
They installed the UCX patch on a 'try it and see' basis last weekend
and so far no problems. The CSC are monitoring the situation and await a
long enogh period to be able to say for sure if it's resolved.
Draw your own conclusions!
Arfon.
|
| 2475.11 | | FRSTSC::64786::frais::schoen | | Fri Jan 24 1997 13:11 | 10 |
| Hi all,
Today the customer inform me that the new image (UCX$ACCESS_SHR.EXE) doesn't
solve his problem.
any more ideas ?
thanks in advance
regards Thomas
|
| 2475.12 | Let's go back to the base note | UTRTSC::SMEETS | Workgroup support | Mon Jan 27 1997 08:01 | 22 |
| Hi Thomas,
Back to the original note.
>> A user send a mail From TL to another TL user over TCP/IP - no mail
>> notification.
>> He also send a mail over TL to himself ->no mail notification.
>> Address syntax : username
>> VT to TL (over TCP/IP) - newmail notification.
>> Address syntax : username
Is this all the time the same PC ?
It shouldn't make any difference if you send mail from TL or a VT client.
Are you sure there a problem with duplicate IP addresses, try to ping the IP
address.
Is the IP address listed in PC_NOTIFY the correct address ?
Martin
|
| 2475.13 | TCP/IP & NEW MAIL NOTIFICATION | TAGEIN::SCHOEN | | Wed Jan 29 1997 08:53 | 19 |
| Hi Martin,
thanks for your reply.
<< Is this all the time the same PC ?
he test with 3 different PC's and all have the problem with notification.
<< It shouldn't make any difference if you send mail from TL or a VT client.
<< Are you sure there a problem with duplicate IP addresses, try to ping the IP
<< address.
yes - he try ping, telnet and VT320 emulation - all is ok.
<< Is the IP address listed in PC_NOTIFY the correct address ?
yes - the IP address is correct.
regards Thomas
|
| 2475.14 | Try the IPMT channel | UTRTSC::SMEETS | Workgroup support | Thu Jan 30 1997 11:33 | 7 |
| Hi Thomas,
I'm out of ideas so, I suggest you raise an IPMT.
Sorry,
Martin
|
| 2475.15 | | FRSTSC::64786::frais::schoen | | Fri Jan 31 1997 11:58 | 7 |
| Hi Martin,
ok - i'll do it.
anyway - thanks for your help !
regards Thomas
|