Conference hydra::dejavu

    Re - .37
    
    I reckon those that are not here anymore, either couldn't do there job,
    or have left to go to a better company.
    
    John.

    Hi susan, hope you didnt have anything serious wrong with you.
    as for the "scots being a rowdy bunch" and "thought you had just
    happened into a pub" ooooh, i am (and this is true) a teetotal
    vegetarian. sorry if you hit youre head when you fell off the chair 
    as it shocks a lot of people. i can't speek for john  (as if i could
    i wouldn't be here i'd have a ventrilaquists<sp> act going or a psychic
    even:^) so ma pattersra saim in ur oot ra pub, oanieway rats aw fur
    ra noo.
    tommy (a richt scoatsmun,^).
      
    p.s do you have a split personality susan/stella like jeckyl n hyde or
    even good n baaaad?.

    
    re. 32
    
    > How does one know if a note is or isn't directed at him/her, if the
    > note is set hidden?
    
    Ah, let's get back in context here. 
    You and T(homas) are new to notesfiles, ie. you two have not been
    part of the conversations, so how in the world could those hidden
    notes be targeted at you?!
    
    Eva

    Eva,
    	I am not new to the notesfiles. I am new to this conference
    however. As for T(homas), who cares. It might well be that HE is just
    nosey, which I thought in the first place, but thinking more on it, I
    only wondered why someone would make a note set hidden upon entering
    such a note.
    I have had some replies as to how one would enter such a note.
    OK, fair enough, nuff said.
    As far as I'm concerned.
    
    John.

    >You and T(homas) are new to notesfiles, ie. you two have not been
    >part of the conversations, so how in the world could those hidden
    >notes be targeted at you?!
    
    We predicted his coming and had the foresight to pre-hide the notes.

    Most things have a simple answer.

    Jamie.

    
    re .41
    
    John,
    
    	This is not an argument, thus there is no winner, no loser.
    	IMO, being curious is one thing, a good thing. Storming into 
    a forum demanding explanations in a disrespectful manner, IMO, in a 
    totally different scenario. If this conversation did not take place
    electronically, but physically instead, wouldn't you think a different
    (read more mature and professional) set of mannerism would have been 
    more appropriate for entry .0 (like saving one's nose from being 
    embedded in one's face analogically). Obviously, this is just my 
    very not-so-humble opinion, YMMV. 
    
    Eva
                                     

    Jamie John eva i hope the (homas) bit is'nt refering to my conversation
    with pj ie;homasexual :^), as my name is and allways will be Tommy
    please.
    John, i'm hurt big style.
    eva, i dont think this conversation!! would have led this way if i had
    known uppercase was considered to be offensive.
    Jamie, nice one.
    
    
    signed     TOMMY 

    Eva,
    	as I've already said, you win.
    You're right, note 0 could have been put another way, but I don't think
    the guy knew he was shouting (as you say for upper case) when he put
    the note in. Someone has obviously guided him in the right direction,
    cos judging by his notes he ain't very computer illitarate, and I hope
    I've spelled that one right.
    You say you can't understand why someone would get hot and bothered
    over set hidden notes, that aren't even directed at them, but why
    should you get hot and bothered at someone who gets hot and bothered at
    set hidden notes. And anyway, why take it out on me. Take it out on
    T(homas) and leave me alone.
    
    I thought when I replied to this topic, that we would be having a
    friendly chatacross the net. You know, I play in a band at week-ends
    and what's your hobbies, etc. I certainly didn't expect this.
    
    John.
    
    PS - YMMV? mmmmm directed at me?
    You Mad Mother V?  should that not be an F?

    YMMV = Your Mileage May Vary

    
    John,
    
    	I didn't realize a philosophical pondering is beyond the scope
    of this conference. I didn't get "hot" and "bothered" thus I had 
    nothing to take out on anyone. I am sorry if "YMMV" threw you off
    (I don't usually see the need to swear as there are many interesting
    yet decent words and phrases to express my mental output). I am not 
    really interested in chit chat per say, as I do not have such a 
    propensity. I guess I'll just stay out of this string until something 
    more intellectually argumentative comes along.         
    
    
    Eva

    .47 right on, Eva.  Notice I've been doing the same.