[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
| Title: | Ask the Storage Architecture Group | 
| Notice: | Check out our web page at http://www-starch.shr.dec.com | 
| Moderator: | SSAG::TERZA  N | 
|  | 
| Created: | Wed Oct 15 1986 | 
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 6756 | 
| Total number of notes: | 25276 | 
6341.0. "S/W shadowing H/W stripe sets on a KZPSC single port" by JOBURG::BERETTA () Fri Jan 24 1997 07:23
    Hi,
    
    I have an Alpha 2000 5/300 dual cpu with two KZPSC's, each with 4 disks
    attached (single port controllers). The system is running VMS 7.0.
    
    I have created the first disk on each controler as a JBOD disk and have
    shadowed them using volume shadowing (s/w raid)
    
    Remaining three disks on each controller have been made into stripe
    sets. 
    
    I have been trying to use DR$INIT as documented in the manual to shadow
    the two stripe sets without success. The DR$INIT manages to initialize
    the disks, and even tells me that they are ready for shadowing. But
    when I issue the "$mount dsa1: /shadow=(dra1,drb1) data" command it
    fails with mesages:
    
    MOUNT-F-NOSHDMEM - NO ELIGIBLE SHADOW SET MEMBERS TO MOUNT THE SHADOW SET
    MOUNT-I-SHDWMEMFAIL - DRA1 FAILED AS A MEMBER OF THE SHADOW SET
    SYSTEM-F-IVDEVNAM - INVALID DEVICE NAME
    
    The system disk shadows with no problem i.e. the two jbod disks. At
    present I have the system disk as a single shadow set member, but plan
    to include the second jbod disk into the set.
    
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    
    Peter.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 6341.1 |  | CLOUD::SHIRRON | Stephen F. Shirron, 223-3198 | Fri Jan 24 1997 11:21 | 3 | 
|  | You must have a non-zero allocation class set to shadow -- do you?
stephen
 | 
| 6341.2 | alloclass set to 0 | JOBURG::BERETTA |  | Tue Jan 28 1997 06:43 | 5 | 
|  |     Oops,
    
    Thanks, that was the problem,
    
    Peter.
 |