| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 2380.1 | I believe this is the reason | WARNUT::FOSSEY::FOSSEY | | Wed Jun 05 1991 05:12 | 7 |
| 2380.2 | Is this the only reason? | MLNCSC::BARCELLARI | Giorgio Barcellari 793-8555 | Wed Jun 05 1991 13:37 | 8 |
| 2380.3 | The reason is that we don't see a requirement to support it | CVG::PETTENGILL | mulp | Wed Jun 05 1991 20:58 | 22 |
| 2380.4 | But why? | GIDDAY::MARSHALL | PaulG.Marshall, Systems Consultant, SPR_CSC | Thu Jun 06 1991 17:55 | 11 |
| 2380.5 | Your standard for `testing' is much lower than our, and we consider that level to be far too low | CVG::PETTENGILL | mulp | Fri Jun 07 1991 15:16 | 21 |
| 2380.6 | RE:-1, taken up offline! | GIDDAY::MARSHALL | PaulG.Marshall, Systems Consultant, SPR_CSC | Wed Jun 12 1991 01:30 | 1 |
| 2380.7 | Unsupported means "at your own risk". | SSDEVO::FIALA | Me, I'm just a recycler. | Wed Jun 12 1991 18:43 | 1 |
| 2380.8 | In this case it means more, it means that we believe that it doesn't work correctly in all cases | CVG::PETTENGILL | mulp | Thu Jun 13 1991 20:33 | 7
|