| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 620.1 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Spigot of pithiness | Fri Apr 04 1997 22:59 | 7 |
| I take it you're talking about the authenticity of it being the
one that covered Jesus of Nazareth in the tomb.
I'm undecided. What do you think?
Richard
|
| 620.2 | re.1 | PCBUOA::HOVEY | | Tue Apr 08 1997 12:45 | 5 |
|
If one looks at the history of when it seemed to surface as well as
the amount of religious artifacts that were being faked at that time.
I think that it's from the medieval time period. Wish that it wasn't
but there's no evidence that it existed beforehand....
|
| 620.3 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Spigot of pithiness | Fri Apr 11 1997 13:48 | 7 |
| .2
There are those who are apprehensive or reluctant about the dating of
the shroud. Have you heard their arguments?
Richard
|
| 620.4 | re.3 | PCBUOA::HOVEY | | Tue Apr 15 1997 11:03 | 6 |
|
I have read some reports of the dating....seems like people who believe
in the Shroud can come up with facts about the dating being inaccurate
because of contamination and so forth...non-believers have their own
agenda's. Since it didn't surface til the 14th century or so I have to
think that's it's not the real thing.
|
| 620.5 | | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Spigot of pithiness | Fri Apr 18 1997 12:27 | 6 |
| I read just yesterday that the shroud will be up for further testing
in the near future and will be viewable to the public for about a
month in 1998.
Richard
|