[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
| Title: | Oracle Rdb - Still a strategic database for DEC on Alpha AXP! | 
| Notice: | RDB_60 is archived, please use RDB_70  .. | 
| Moderator: | NOVA::SMITHI SON | 
|  | 
| Created: | Fri Mar 18 1994 | 
| Last Modified: | Thu May 29 1997 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 5118 | 
| Total number of notes: | 28246 | 
5012.0. "Rdb 7.0-00: RMU/Unload bugchecks at BLI$CALLG + BC" by AVMSV1::EKREISLE (Erich Kreisler) Mon Feb 10 1997 12:44
Hello,
A customer has problems unloading a view under Rdb 7.0. Whenever he unloads 
a special view a bugcheckdump is written to the screen or disk, depending 
on the circumstances described below. 
First here are the exceptions:
***** Exception at 001B7ABC : BLI$CALLG + 000000BC                              
%COSI-F-UNEXPERR, unexpected system error                                       
-COSI-F-UNEXPERR, unexpected system error
Saved PC =3D 005E0DAC : STD$DUMP_ALPHA_VMS_STACK + 000000DC                     
Saved PC =3D 005BE4C4 : KOD$BUGCHECK_DUMP + 00000D24                            
Saved PC =3D 002EF24C : RMUUNL$NAME_LEN + 000028D4                              
Saved PC =3D 80895D44 : symbol not found                                        
Saved PC =3D E53122BC : symbol not found                                        
Saved PC =3D 001E65EC : COSI_CHF_SIGNAL + 00000164                              
Saved PC =3D 001B7ABC : BLI$CALLG + 000000BC                                    
Saved PC =3D 001E6464 : COSI$CHF_SIGNAL + 0000013C                              
Saved PC =3D 001B7ABC : BLI$CALLG + 000000BC                                    
Saved PC =3D 002F1328 : RMUUNL$NAME_LEN + 000049B0                              
Saved PC =3D 002EBC18 : RMU$UNLOAD + 00000648                                   
Saved PC =3D 002EB1CC : RMUCLI$UNLOAD + 00000E84                                
Saved PC =3D 00207F14 : RMU_DISPATCH + 00000F34
Saved PC =3D 00206FB0 : RMU_STARTUP + 000004A0                                  
Saved PC =3D 0014002C : RMU$MAIN + 0000002C                                     
Saved PC =3D 7EE6C160 : symbol not found 
Versions at customer site: 
	Rdb 7.0-00 and 7.0-01 (prerelease)
	OpenVMS 6.2 with patches (as suggested in 9.166)
Versions here in the office:
	Rdb 7.0-01 (prerelease)
	OpenVMS 6.1
These are the commands the customer issues:
1. small number of buffers
	fails for the customer if he has no indices defined on the biggest
	tables, works for me, no matter if I have indices defined on the 
	table or not. The dump is written to the screen.
   $ rmu/unload/buffer=100/exte=10000/virtual/rms=(file=x.x) dwhs -
	V_SUMWSSTAG disk$data2:[lotto]V_SUMWSSTAG      
2. big number of buffers
	I always get exceeded quota, but I don't have an AXP with 2GB of
	memory. 
	The executes for a while at the customer site, and then bugchecks,
	indices are defined on the main tables. Dump written to disk.
   $ rmu/unload/buffer=10000/exte=10000/virtual/rms=(file=x.x) dwhs -
	V_SUMWSSTAG disk$data2:[lotto]V_SUMWSSTAG
I can't reproduce any of those problems under Rdb 7.0.01 (prerelease) and
OpenVMS 6.1 and the customer database. The dumps will be delivered to me
tomorrow afternoon.
Can this be related to OpenVMS 6.2 ? Any hints are welcome.
Thank you in advance,
	erich
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 5012.1 | Another one...... | M5::BLEHLBAC | RDB: 34% better than real life | Tue Feb 18 1997 15:18 | 11 | 
|  | Hi,
  Any ideas on this??
  I have a customer with a similar problem.
  Customer is on Rdb7, axp, vms 6.2, trying to unload a table.
  He is going to try the unload on a vax.
                    Thanks,   Barry
 | 
| 5012.2 |  | DUCATI::LASTOVICA | Is it possible to be totally partial? | Tue Feb 18 1997 15:31 | 1 | 
|  | If you can reproduce it, please BUG it.
 | 
| 5012.3 | stay tuned .... | M5::BLEHLBAC | RDB: 34% better than real life | Tue Feb 18 1997 16:05 | 4 | 
|  | 
>>If you can reproduce it, please BUG it.
OK ..... I'll see what I can do.   Thanks!!
 | 
| 5012.4 |  | AVMSV1::EKREISLE | Erich Kreisler | Wed Feb 19 1997 09:04 | 9 | 
|  | We tried to reproduce it with the customers systemdisk and database on our small
machine and failed. The customer has an 8400 with 2GB of memory.
The other error that gets also written out to the screen is RMS-F-DME. The
customer checked this with the articles in DSIN, but could not find a solution
yet. On the other hand I filed a bug 452852 for this problem.
re .-1: I hope you can reproduce, we can't do it in every environment.
erich
 |