[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
| Title: | Microsoft Windows 95 ("Chicago") | 
| Notice: | Please read topics 1 to 22 before writing anything | 
| Moderator: | EEMELI::BACKSTROM | 
|  | 
| Created: | Sun Nov 13 1994 | 
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 2958 | 
| Total number of notes: | 19968 | 
2860.0. "CMD driver on Venturis and Win95 problem?" by SIOG::CORCORAN () Wed Mar 19 1997 06:11
    Since I did a Win95 upgrade,I notice on my Venturis FP4100 (m/b v2,bios
    2.01) that the new CMD driver being used causes an extra drive to
    appear-I have drive C and D on the primary IDE,drive E and F (a CD)on
    the secondary.
    
    If I don't load MSCDEX,I get drive E as a copy of drive F.If I change the
    config setting to point to CMDX2.sys instead of CMDX.sys (both drivers
    are in the c:\windows\command directory) , things are ok except drive G is
    the CD and no F when I go into Win95,presumably because of the original
    upgrade making it the CD drive.
    
    It doesn't matter if the CD is master or slave on the secondary IDE.
    
    ( BTW,The original CMDX.sys driver in directory c:\quickcmd appears ok also
    if this is put in config.sys)
    
    
    
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 2860.1 | CMD controller problems | STAR::DZIEDZIC | Tony Dziedzic - DTN 381-2438 | Wed Mar 19 1997 07:25 | 10 | 
|  |     Search for article Q151911 in the Microsoft Knowledge Base;
    Q132158 might also be useful (or a generic search on the word
    "CMD").  There are several known upgrade problems with CMD
    controllers which can result in bizzare results.
    
    Incidentally, I don't think you *need* to load any CMD drivers
    in CONFIG.SYS - at least, when I upgraded a Celebris FP90 the
    resulting CONFIG.SYS was pretty empty.
    
    P.S. The Knowledge Base is http://www.microsoft.com/kb
 | 
| 2860.2 | yes,maybe the CMD drivers are superfluous.... | SIOG::CORCORAN |  | Thu Mar 20 1997 07:26 | 5 | 
|  |     Thanks,I'll check it out.I think you are right about the need for the
    CMD driver,during my t/s I left them out and the drives appeared ok.
    
    I seem to recall a TIMA article also where someone else also questioned the
    need for the CMD driver
 |