| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1841.1 |  | NETCAD::SLAWRENCE |  | Wed Jan 04 1995 16:53 | 3 | 
|  |     
    Why turn off spanning tree?  It costs almost nothing.
    
 | 
| 1841.2 |  | NETCAD::ANIL |  | Thu Jan 05 1995 13:54 | 7 | 
|  |     Shouldn't be a problem turning off spanning tree in this case.
    
    I've seen people turning off STP on remote links in order to not
    have disturbances on one side of a far link disrupt an extended LAN
    on the other.
    
    Anil
 | 
| 1841.3 |  | SCCAT::SHERRILL |  | Thu Jan 05 1995 15:08 | 7 | 
|  |     
    Thanks for the replys, it looks like this is the config we will go
    with.Tell me if my thinking is wrong  , the reason we want spanning
    tree off is we don't want the remote bridge to become the root bridge
    for this network as there are DECbridge 900's in the 4 hubs that are 
    in the main office.
               
 | 
| 1841.4 |  | NETCAD::SLAWRENCE |  | Thu Jan 05 1995 15:20 | 3 | 
|  |     
    Make sure that you set the 90 to do IEEE bridging, not DEC bridging.
    
 | 
| 1841.5 | See note 271 in KALI:::DEWBR | FOUNDR::OUIMETTE | Don't just do something, sit there! | Mon Jan 09 1995 16:32 | 6 | 
|  |     	See note 271 in the DECbrouter90 conference, KALI::DEWBR. Spanning
    tree is *not* disable-able on the DECbrouter90, but there is a way to
    create separate, non-communicating 802.1d Spanning Tree domains.
    
    Chuck Ouimette
    NSTG
 |