| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1252.1 | WFW fix in next release | NAC::FORREST |  | Tue Jul 26 1994 17:42 | 6 | 
|  | 
	HUBwatch for Windows V3.1, our next release, should work with 
	the WFW IP stack. HUBwatch V2.0 used the Pathworks V5.0 code, 
	and there was a fix in Pathworks subsequently for WFW.
	
 | 
| 1252.2 | Works fine in WFW 3.11 | CXPERT::MCLENDON |  | Wed Jul 27 1994 14:50 | 6 | 
|  |     Hi,
       I'm running Hubwatch v2 on a WFW 3.11 system just fine.  However,
    I'm also using the IPSTACK directory and *not* the IP in WFW.  So, if
    you're asking a compatibility/operability question, "yes", it works.
    
    Bruce
 | 
| 1252.3 | HUBwatch and Windows for Workgroups using TCP/IP | SNOFS1::ELEFTHERIOU |  | Wed Oct 26 1994 21:55 | 18 | 
|  |     Gidday,
    
    So Bruce, are you saying that HUBwatch does NOT run using the WFW
    TCP/IP stack? because I have a customer who wants to use the native
    Microsoft 32bit TCP/IP stack under WFW with NO NETBEUI network.
    
    He receives an error message ERROR:SOCKET CANNOT BE CREATED ERROR
    NUMBER RETURNED 1001.  The operation of the PC under TCP/IP is just
    fine, it is only the HUBwatch component that fails.
    
    I have asked him to start WFW as DOS> win/n (start WFW with no net) and
    to try using the HUBwatch supplied TCP/IP stack.  I am waiting to hear
    back from him but it would be nice to know if what he wants to do will
    work.
    
    Thanks in advance,
    
    Harry E.
 | 
| 1252.4 | Works ok here.... | SCCAT::MILLER |  | Mon Oct 31 1994 16:13 | 6 | 
|  |     I have it working on a 425 laptop.  Just did an "add protocol" to bring
    in the RELEASED version of WFW TCP/IP (the beta version didn't work)
    and then install Hubwatch only.  It came up without doing any manual
    modifications to any PC files.  Works great!  I still have the NETBEUI
    protocol installed, but I don't use it for anything (the laptop is
    mainly used on customer's IP networks).
 | 
| 1252.5 | WfW with Banyan | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Wed Jan 11 1995 10:25 | 6 | 
|  |     I have a customer that is running WfW, using the Banyan network
    drivers. Can HUBwatch use their stack to run, or do I need to load the
    Pathworks IP stack that comes with HUBwatch?
    
    Dennis Faust
    
 | 
| 1252.6 |  | KERNEL::MCSKEANEP | one bit brain with parity error | Wed Jan 11 1995 11:53 | 17 | 
|  |     
    I have a customer running WfW and HUBwatch. If he uses the supplied
    stack in the IPSTACK directory, everything works fine. If he tries to
    use a Pathworks V5.0 stack, then he gets an 'agent not responding'. He
    is however able to ping the hub using this stack.
    
    I took a trace and could see the ping packets going out but when I
    tried to start up HUBwatch, no packets were seen on the network.
    
    Any clues as to why I can't get this working? I tried reproducing the
    problem here at the CSC but the only PC I could get hold of here was
    running Pathworks V5.1 and everything seemed to work okay. The customer
    is using V5.0C of the client and server
    
    Thanks,
    
    POL.  
 |