| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1161.1 | Alarms in V3 are OpenVMS only. | SLINK::HOOD | I'd rather be at the Kennebec | Mon Jun 27 1994 09:55 | 20 |
| > as we are planning the delivery of HUbwatch V3 with FDDI handling ,
> and alarms and so on with a PC , some sizing could help determining
> the PC to provide
Alarms in V3.0, V3.1 are OpenVMS only. Alarms are not in either the Windows
or OSF/1 versions of HUBwatch.
>PS : by the way , can we propose as an alternative an Alpha OSF 3000 LX
> with 64 M RAM , 1 Giga disk as hubwatch V3 should be available
> in the same time frame than the windows version
> from experience with VMS , Hubwatch seems a big memory consumer (
> and pagefile space ) and not too much CPU
It is always nicer to sell Alphas. Maybe if you could sell enough of them,
Big Bob P will keep us around a while longer.
Tom Hood
HUBwatch
|
| 1161.2 | and an Alpha PC ? | TLSE10::SELLES | Pierre-Jean - Toulouse -France | Tue Jun 28 1994 06:02 | 21 |
|
OK for selling more Alphas ;-)
if we propose an ALpha PC , are the requirements
the same than for Intel PC ? memory ? disk ?
any test already done ?
i know V3 in the way of being done on Windows and OSF
( from status.txt ) but really , as the customer is sizing its
budgets , and as they have already PCs , i thought that alarms
would be a great differentiator between PC and OSF .
so why no alarms on OSF , as they are on VMS ?
anyway is it also realistic to pretend managing more than one
dechub900 with the PC ? this could help me in proposing osf
for that with multi-windowing feature .
thanks for your inputs
|
| 1161.3 | because... | SLINK::HOOD | I'd rather be at the Kennebec | Tue Jun 28 1994 09:30 | 25 |
| > if we propose an ALpha PC , are the requirements
> the same than for Intel PC ? memory ? disk ?
HUBwatch for OSF/1 is still being developed, so things like minimum
configurations aren't ready yet.
> so why no alarms on OSF , as they are on VMS ?
The reason alarms aren't on OSF/1 (but are on OpenVMS) is that the alarms
uses a separate already existing image, the MSU event daemon, which is a lot
more complicated to port than the HUBwatch image. Because we need to get V3.1
out SOON, that was a trade-off. This is *not* the long-term strategy for
HUBwatch for OSF/1, which *will* include an alarms component, maybe in the
release after 3.1.
With each release of HUBwatch the combinations of new hub modules, management
features, and O/S platforms is growing, and the HUBwatch group isn't.
> anyway is it also realistic to pretend managing more than one
> dechub900 with the PC ?
Not at the same time, but you can swap between hubs with no problem.
Tom Hood
What's a pc?
|
| 1161.4 | a PC is an Ordinateur Personnel | TLSE10::SELLES | Pierre-Jean - Toulouse -France | Tue Jun 28 1994 12:52 | 10 |
|
a PC stands for Personal Computer re ;-)
or in Frenglish , an "Ordinateur Personnel "
thanks so far for your answers ; they help a lot
|