| Title: | DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE | 
| Notice: | Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7 | 
| Moderator: | NETCAD::COLELLA DT | 
| Created: | Wed Nov 13 1991 | 
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 4455 | 
| Total number of notes: | 16761 | 
I've installed hubwatch fo VMS on my VS4060. When I start it up with the 
parameters of the DECagent named dechub.mlo.dec.com the icon of the
hub appears and then the program exits with an exception.
Am I giving the wrong parameters?
-Geert-
BHT362> mcr hubwatch -x 16.123.96.253 -c public
(W): NMS_DIR is not defined - using [.uid] directory
(W): Using SYS$MANAGER:HUBWATCH_AGENTS.TXT
(D):
HUB CONFIGURATION:
(I): ___________________________________________________________________________
(D): Slots:     1       2       3       4       5       6       7       8
(D): Cards:     DETMR   DS90L+  ?       DS90L   DECMR   Empty   DENMA   DEWGB
(I): ___________________________________________________________________________
(D): retry[1/0/12] (slot=1[1/0/1],vw=1,rq=5668e0)
(D): Slot 1: Port 1:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 1: Port 2:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 1: Port 3:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 1: Port 4:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 1: Port 5:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 1: Port 6:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 1: Port 7:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 1: Port 8:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 2: Port 1:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 2: Port 2:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 2: Port 3:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 2: Port 4:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 2: Port 5:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 2: Port 6:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 2: Port 7:  status = DISABLED
(D): Slot 2: Port 8:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 4: Port 1:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 4: Port 2:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 4: Port 3:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 4: Port 4:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 4: Port 5:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 4: Port 6:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 4: Port 7:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 4: Port 8:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 5: Port 1:  status = DISCONNECTED (OFF)
(D): Slot 5: Port 2:  status = ONLINE
(D): Slot 5: Port 3:  status = ONLINE
(D): Slot 5: Port 4:  status = DISABLED
(D): Slot 5: Port 5:  status = DISABLED
(D): Slot 5: Port 6:  status = DISABLED
(D): Slot 8: Port 1:  status = ONLINE
(D): Slot 8: Port 2:  status = ONLINE
%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual address=00000001, PC
=002EE29F, PSL=03C00000
%TRACE-F-TRACEBACK, symbolic stack dump follows
module name     routine name                     line       rel PC    abs PC
                                                           002EE29F  002EE29F
                                                           002EE327  002EE327
                                                           002EE623  002EE623
                                                           002EDADD  002EDADD
ONEHUB          main                            65565      0000062F  0002AB5F
    
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 146.1 | had similar access violation | ZPOVC::SINSPS | Wed Nov 24 1993 02:14 | 31 | |
|     Hi, nobody can advise on the problem ?
    
    My customer has encountered similar access violation as follows :-
    
    %SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual
    address=00000000, PC=0003A5A1, PSL=03C00004
    
    Improperly handled condition, image exit forced.
    
    	Signal arguments		Stack contents
    
    	Number = 00000005		   200C0000
    	Name   = 0000000C		   7FF10854
    		 00000000		   00119954
    		 00000000		   00000001
    		 0003A5A1		   00112B90
    		 03C00004		   7FF1085A
    					   00115EE4
    					   7FF10858
    					   001593CA
    					   00304CB4
    
    Register dump
    
    R0 = 00000000	R1 = 003689C8	R2 = 00000008	R3 = 00000006
    R4 = 0067CF28	R5 = 000000BE	R6 = 006756A8	R7 = 7FF1080C
    R8 = 7FF10808	R9 = 00304CB4	R10= 00000000	R11= 00304D3E
    AP = 7FF107C4	FP = 7FF10784	SP = 7FF10800	PC = 0003A5A1
    PSL= 03C00004
    
    - LEH
 | |||||
| 146.2 | More details, please. | SLINK::HOOD | I'd rather be surfing | Wed Nov 24 1993 10:46 | 6 | 
| Re: .1 What version? What was happening when the crash occurred? Tom H HUBsquash development | |||||
| 146.3 | ZPOVC::SINSPS | Thu Nov 25 1993 04:25 | 15 | ||
|     re: .2
    
    > What version?
    
    	version 2.0
    
    >What was happening when the crash occurred?
    
    The customer mentioned that he clicked on the "minimize" of the window.
    
    Any idea ?
    
    
    	- LEH
    
 | |||||
| 146.4 | Need more details | QUIVER::HAROKOPUS | Mon Nov 29 1993 10:04 | 10 | |
|     What windows were up when he did this and which window did he try
    to minimize.  Was it the fornt panel display or one of the
    module windows?
    
    I haven't seen this happen before so we'll need more information
    on exactly what your customer did to make this happen.
    
    Thanks,
    
    Bob
 | |||||
| 146.5 | more accvios | KYOSS1::WALKER | Clarke Walker, NJ DC, DTN:323-4040 | Fri Dec 15 1995 11:36 | 12 | 
|     I am getting access violation using:
    
    	HubWatch V3.1.3
    	OpenVMS V6.1
    	90Agent firmware 3.0.1  (replace module since 2.5 couldn't see
    				 any ot the IP addresses on this network)
    
    So far it happens after I open a 90TL module window and after I click 
    on any of the more info (tree, arrow, bridge, statistics) for a 90FL
    module.
    
    Thanks.
 | |||||