| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 913.1 | Should work but not particularily well | FLASK2::SYSTEM | Nigel Bridport @REO | Tue Mar 04 1997 10:07 | 12 | 
|  |     Hi Mike,
    
    	Exchange really requires 64Mb memory to run efficiently.  You
    	would get some benefit from adding a little extra to your 32Mb
    	system.
    
    	You don't really say how much disk space you have ?  In the real
      	world, Exchange is split over a number of disks.  Also, are you
    	intending to run any other products on the system apart from NT
    	and Exchange.
    
    Nige.
 | 
| 913.2 |  | IOSG::BILSBOROUGH | SWBFS | Tue Mar 04 1997 11:42 | 13 | 
|  |     
    I'll be using it as my PC but most of the time I expect Exchange won't
    be running.  We're developing Mailbus Monitor for NT which will monitor
    Exchange.  So it'll be a case of me wanting to test something, starting
    up Mailbus Monitor, starting up Exchange and carrying out some tests.
    
    I have just a 2Gb disk at the moment but I dual boot so there isn't
    that much space on the NT side.  I was hoping to just put Exchange on
    the one new disk, do you think that I need to spread it a little so that it
    won't die?
    
    Thanks,
    Mike
 | 
| 913.3 |  | FLASK2::SYSTEM | Nigel Bridport @REO | Wed Mar 05 1997 07:13 | 5 | 
|  | 
	It is normally best to spread Exchange for performance reasons but
	I have been successfully running Exchange V4.0 on a single disk.
Nige.
 | 
| 913.4 |  | IOSG::BILSBOROUGH | SWBFS | Mon Mar 10 1997 23:06 | 7 | 
|  |     
    Well the 64mb and the extra 2gb is in.
    I'll next upgrade from NT V4.0 to NT v4.0 Service pack 2 and go from there.
    
    I'll report back here for others future reference.
    
    Mike
 | 
| 913.5 |  | IOSG::BILSBOROUGH | SWBFS | Thu Mar 20 1997 17:45 | 6 | 
|  |     
    Just an update.  Exchange v5.0 is installed and working fine.  I've
    even got it working with MB400 in just one day.  Wow I must be
    learning.
    
    Mike
 |