T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
479.1 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jun 28 1995 09:17 | 1 |
| Unwanted goat? Speciesist!
|
479.2 | | BOXORN::HAYS | Some things are worth dying for | Wed Jun 28 1995 09:19 | 1 |
| 2/3 chance of winning if switching.
|
479.4 | | POWDML::LAUER | Little Chamber of Passhion | Wed Jun 28 1995 09:27 | 2 |
|
Oh no, not this question again 8^/.
|
479.5 | 0% with my luck... | GAAS::BRAUCHER | | Wed Jun 28 1995 09:27 | 6 |
|
Yes, 2/3 of the time you win by switching. Your initial odds
were 1/3. They still are if you stay. But you know that the
rest of the time the prize is behind the other door, so 2/3.
bb
|
479.6 | | GRANPA::MWANNEMACHER | NRA member | Wed Jun 28 1995 09:32 | 3 |
|
No, because there's a bunch of $100 bills shoved up the goats arse....
|
479.7 | I know this one | CSLALL::HENDERSON | Learning to lean | Wed Jun 28 1995 09:32 | 5 |
|
The train from Chicago left at 8AM?
|
479.9 | more's the pity | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | person B | Wed Jun 28 1995 09:44 | 3 |
|
i guess edp never gets tired of this one.
|
479.10 | | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | Reformatted to fit your screen | Wed Jun 28 1995 09:45 | 1 |
| I don't know but Monty is wearing black shoes.
|
479.11 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jun 28 1995 09:46 | 1 |
| I concur -- Monte Hall _is_ a problem.
|
479.12 | | BIGQ::SILVA | Diablo | Wed Jun 28 1995 09:47 | 2 |
|
eeewwwweee..... the goats are filled with drugs wrapped in condoms.
|
479.13 | | CSLALL::HENDERSON | Learning to lean | Wed Jun 28 1995 09:52 | 9 |
|
How do you get to Monte Hall?
Practice, my boy, practice
|
479.14 | | MKOTS3::JMARTIN | I press on toward the goal | Wed Jun 28 1995 10:00 | 3 |
| Can I pose a logic question here or is this limited to Monty Dull?
-Jack
|
479.15 | | LANDO::OLIVER_B | | Wed Jun 28 1995 10:43 | 2 |
| Monty Hall's problem? Reports are that he
suffered from that Wade Boggs disease.
|
479.16 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Mr Blister | Wed Jun 28 1995 10:47 | 3 |
| The way I heard it, Diane Parkinson was suffering from the 'kiss
n tell for mucho bucks' syndrome. That's the one where you engage in
consentual sex, but when you get dumped you sue.
|
479.17 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jun 28 1995 10:48 | 1 |
| Monty and Carol behind door #1?
|
479.18 | | LANDO::OLIVER_B | | Wed Jun 28 1995 11:02 | 2 |
| The Diane Parkinson's Disease??
Dreadful.
|
479.19 | | LANDO::OLIVER_B | | Wed Jun 28 1995 11:04 | 1 |
| Consensual.
|
479.20 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jun 28 1995 11:05 | 2 |
| Was Diane Parkinson a replacement for Carol? Carol was the lovely curtain-
opener in my LMaD-watching days.
|
479.21 | | CSLALL::HENDERSON | Learning to lean | Wed Jun 28 1995 11:11 | 4 |
|
We're not confusing Mr. Hall with Bob Barker are we?
|
479.22 | | LANDO::OLIVER_B | | Wed Jun 28 1995 11:15 | 1 |
| Oh, I don't know, those game show hosts all look alike.
|
479.23 | I'm sure she'll correct me if I'm wrong | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Mr Blister | Wed Jun 28 1995 11:16 | 2 |
| It was Barker that was/is being sued by Parkinson. I'm not aware of
any lawsuits against Hall; I just assumed Bonnie aliased the two.
|
479.24 | | LANDO::OLIVER_B | | Wed Jun 28 1995 11:19 | 1 |
| Now does Barker wear a collar?
|
479.25 | | TROOA::TRP109::Chris | dedicated sybarite | Wed Jun 28 1995 12:33 | 2 |
| This sounds like a problem for Gene Haag.... except I guess he
would want the door with the goat!
|
479.26 | | EVMS::MORONEY | The gene pool needs chlorine.... | Wed Jun 28 1995 12:34 | 7 |
| re .12:
> eeewwwweee..... the goats are filled with drugs wrapped in condoms.
^^^^^^^^^^
That's a sheep, not a goat.
|
479.27 | | BOXORN::HAYS | Some things are worth dying for | Wed Jun 28 1995 12:35 | 1 |
| Didn't someone just say Gene Haag and sheep?
|
479.28 | ba-a-a-a-a humbug | CSSREG::BROWN | Just Visiting This Planet | Wed Jun 28 1995 13:04 | 1 |
| not to be confused with Monty Python or Monte Carlo...
|
479.29 | | CONSLT::MCBRIDE | Reformatted to fit your screen | Wed Jun 28 1995 13:05 | 1 |
| Yes, it was Bark Bobber not Monty Hall.
|
479.30 | | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Wed Jun 28 1995 14:39 | 2 |
| I'll take "Vietnamese Basketball Stars" for one thousand, Alex.
|
479.31 | | SMURF::BINDER | Father, Son, and Holy Spigot | Wed Jun 28 1995 14:47 | 1 |
| And the answer is "Hoop Chi Minh."
|
479.32 | Oh, but look what was inside the thing you traded away | DECWIN::RALTO | I hate summer | Wed Jun 28 1995 23:30 | 8 |
| >> No, because there's a bunch of $100 bills shoved up the goats arse....
Bwah-hah-hah!... spoken like a true LMaD fan, because of course
hiding the real prize inside a bogus prize is exactly the kind
of thing they used to do on that show (though never in that
exact orifice, of course).
Chris
|
479.33 | | ALPHAZ::HARNEY | John A Harney | Thu Jun 29 1995 17:54 | 4 |
|
Monty Hall topic, people.
\john
|
479.34 | | TROOA::COLLINS | My hovercraft is full of eels. | Thu Jun 29 1995 18:14 | 9 |
|
Your p_n is missing some punctuation, \john.
Could it be "John A. Harney", or perhaps "John, A Harney"?
And who is Monty Hall? I thought we were talking about Monte Hall.
;�)
|
479.35 | | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Thu Jun 29 1995 20:30 | 2 |
| 3-card Huntz
|
479.36 | | ALPHAZ::HARNEY | John A Harney | Thu Jun 29 1995 21:41 | 6 |
| re: .34
I obviously need a vacation.
I'll take one.
\john
|
479.37 | | POWDML::LAUER | Little Chamber of Passhion | Fri Jun 30 1995 08:46 | 2 |
|
I thought you just HAD a vacation!
|
479.38 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri Jun 30 1995 09:25 | 1 |
| So is it Monte or Monty?
|
479.39 | | TROOA::COLLINS | My hovercraft is full of eels. | Fri Jun 30 1995 09:33 | 5 |
|
Monte, the card game.
Monty, the game show host.
|
479.40 | | SMURF::BINDER | Father, Son, and Holy Spigot | Fri Jun 30 1995 09:47 | 3 |
| .39
Monte is not a card game, it is a grifters' trick.
|
479.41 | | TROOA::COLLINS | My hovercraft is full of eels. | Fri Jun 30 1995 09:56 | 7 |
|
.40:
Webster's says: "a card game in which..."
But beyond that, I ain't gonna argue about words with The Binder.
|
479.42 | | SMURF::BINDER | Father, Son, and Holy Spigot | Fri Jun 30 1995 10:22 | 6 |
| .41
John, I stand corrected. I'd never before heard of the kind of monte
described in Webster. The monte I know uses only two (or three, in a
variant) cards and is similar in purpose and effect to the old shell
game. I used to be a very proficient operator of three-card monte.
|
479.43 | | OOTOOL::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Fri Jun 30 1995 11:27 | 1 |
| Well, it's a game played with cards, so technically....
|
479.44 | | SMURF::BINDER | Father, Son, and Holy Spigot | Fri Jun 30 1995 11:36 | 4 |
| .43
Get with the program. The first four words in .42 are "John, I stand
corrected."
|
479.45 | | OOTOOL::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Fri Jun 30 1995 11:39 | 5 |
| So? Just because you don't want to talk about it any more, doesn't
mean I have to abandon the subject.
And I bet you didn't stand at all. I bet you sat through the whole
thing. So there.
|
479.46 | DID ALOT OF CHARITY WORK | PENUTS::COMEAU | | Fri Jun 30 1995 11:41 | 13 |
|
Monty Hall from Lets Make a Deal was the national celebrity
chairman for teh Illitis and Colitus Foundation.
Did lots of good work for this cause but never got
the BIG telethons like Jerry Lewis.
DAC
|
479.47 | | LANDO::OLIVER_B | | Fri Jun 30 1995 13:12 | 1 |
| Illitis a candlestickus for him.
|
479.48 | | SMURF::BINDER | Father, Son, and Holy Spigot | Fri Jun 30 1995 13:16 | 8 |
| .45
> And I bet you didn't stand at all. I bet you sat through the whole
> thing. So there.
stand v. 8.a. To be in a specified state or condition.
American Heritage Dictionary, Third Edition.
|
479.49 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | the countdown is on | Fri Jun 30 1995 13:18 | 1 |
| Ileitis
|
479.50 | | LANDO::OLIVER_B | | Fri Jun 30 1995 13:22 | 1 |
| Ha!
|
479.51 | | DECLNE::SHEPARD | It's the Republicans' fault | Fri Jun 30 1995 13:32 | 3 |
| Now what was the question?
Mikey
|
479.52 | Another variation of "I know where you got those shoes".... | PERFOM::LICEA_KANE | when it's comin' from the left | Fri Jun 30 1995 13:36 | 6 |
| Binder is still right about one thing.
Three-card monte is *not* a card game.
It is a scam. A whole scam. And nothing but a scam.
-mr. bill
|
479.53 | | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Wed Jul 05 1995 11:54 | 4 |
| > -< Another variation of "I know where you got those shoes".... >-
Let me guess. Is the answer, "You've got them on your feet"?
|
479.54 | | TROOA::COLLINS | The Greater Action Area | Thu Jul 20 1995 16:44 | 5 |
|
Okay, pedants. If you're driving along, and a hubcap comes off your
front right wheel, will the hubcap fly ahead of the car (at least,
temporarily) or fall immediately behind? And why?
|
479.55 | spin control | HBAHBA::HAAS | time compressed | Thu Jul 20 1995 16:48 | 8 |
| Like a lot of other things in life, it's all a matter of timing.
In this case, it's all in the ejection. If'n it's comes off prematurely,
the hubcap immediately falls down and is left behind. But if'n it has
enough prowess, it could readily stand up to the conditions and fly
ahead.
TTom
|
479.56 | | LEADIN::REITH | | Thu Jul 20 1995 16:54 | 30 |
|
>Okay, pedants. If you're driving along, and a hubcap comes off your
>front right wheel, will the hubcap fly ahead of the car (at least,
>temporarily) or fall immediately behind? And why?
It all depends on what you were doing at the time it came off.
If you were taking a left corner, it would go straight as you turn.
If you were "smoking" the tires (and no I don't smoke my tires,
it clogs the pipes) it would fly ahead.
If its still attached to your tire as it falls off the car, then it
would roll ahead of your (now hard to control) car.
If you were braking, it would also fly ahead (as your car slowed down
but the hubcap didn't).
If you were just cruising along, then the increased air resistance as
the thing left the tire would cause it to fall behind. Also, when it
hit the ground, it would be rotating at the same rate as the tire.
But, it is a smaller diameter, so its linear speed is less, and thus
the ground would also cause it to slow down.
My personal experience has been that this only happens on a dark night,
so you could not see the thing even if it did fly ahead of you. Also,
it usually lands in a yard with a big dog who is now mad about being
hit by a hubcap.
Skip
|
479.57 | | MEKCUF::COVINGTON | When the going gets weird... | Thu Jul 20 1995 23:45 | 4 |
| Wow.
At first I was going to say there was no way it could fly ahead, but
Skip came up with two bonafide ways for it to do just that.
Very insightful.
|
479.58 | | DEVLPR::DKILLORAN | Love In An Elevator | Fri Jul 21 1995 08:11 | 12 |
|
> If you were taking a left corner, it would go straight as you turn.
> . . . . . .
> . . . . . .
> . . . . . .
> it usually lands in a yard with a big dog who is now mad about being
> hit by a hubcap.
It sounds like there are some interesting stories in there someplace !
:-)
Dan
|
479.59 | Watch the movie and count the 'caps | SPEZKO::FRASER | Mobius Loop; see other side | Fri Jul 21 1995 08:48 | 5 |
| Or, if it was the Mustang as used in "Bullit" the hubcaps would
magically regenerate, all by themselves...
&y
|