| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 380.1 | More from where that came from | CSC32::G_HOUSE | | Thu Oct 29 1987 19:48 | 19 |
| Great idea!!! I'm always interested in increasing my knowledge, which
is admittedly weak. As a matter of fact, I was looking for something
similar to this when I first started reading this note and the MUSIC
conference.
I would say that this conference has been more informative than the
other, but I suppose that's a function of the general concept behind
the note not anyones fault (yep, this is an attempt to keep from
getting flamed by avid MUSIC noters...)
Just from reading the other notes here, there is obviously a lot
of musical knowledge available here. I know I'd like to tap it.
So how about it all you musical wizards (bow, bow, grovel, grovel...),
Whatcha think?
Greg
(who_in_the_tradition_of_notes_here_will_tell_his_life_story_after_
his_name_and_could_desperately_use_more_music_theory)
|
| 380.2 | Good Idea | WALLAC::WHITBY | Working on the Pleasure Principle | Fri Nov 06 1987 19:08 | 11 |
|
I think this would be a great idea. As stated in the previous reply,
I for one would also like to gain from those who are very knowledgable.
The week by week lesson thing also sounds great. One thing that
I would like to see is that if somebody does decide to write the
column that it be written so the beginner understands and the knowledgable
don't get bored.
Tom
|
| 380.3 | Guitar knowledge is a terrible thing to waste | SANCHO::WHITBY | Wired For Sound | Fri Nov 13 1987 02:39 | 7 |
|
I guess only a few thought this was a good idea. To bad I was looking
forward to it.
Oh well
Tom
|
| 380.4 | 1 more vote | DEPOT::FLATHERS | | Fri Nov 13 1987 11:10 | 3 |
|
reply -1, Is this reverse psychology!!! I think its a great idea
also. I bet only a small fraction who agree had replied so far.
|
| 380.5 | Got my vote | STAR::KMCDONOUGH | | Fri Nov 13 1987 12:09 | 7 |
| I thought it was a good idea when I wrote that base note. However,
with the lack of replies, I didn't think too many people agreed.
Especially the people with the theory skills to write the columns.
Kevin
|
| 380.6 | Maybe we can do it ourselves... | CSC32::G_HOUSE | Greg House - CSC/CS | Fri Nov 13 1987 15:15 | 12 |
|
re: .5
It looks like the only ones interested in this are the recepiants,
judging from the replies.
Perhaps we ignorant types should do a little research and put in what
we learn. Then those that REALLY know it can correct us if necessary.
Whatcha think?
Greg
|
| 380.7 | | MIST::CARSTENSEN | | Fri Nov 13 1987 21:06 | 19 |
|
I can see where it would be difficult for someone to write
a column. Time seems to be a scarce commodity, along with
the fact that there is a myriad of topics from which to choose.
Perhaps people could enter some questions that they have concerning
specific topics of music theory. I have often found the
noters here to be more than willing to answer questions.
There are several sources of material available to you. You could
get a textbook on beginning music theory from a college book store
or check out some of the articles in magazines such as Guitar Player.
Personally, I have found private lessons to be invaluable
to someone serious about learning.
frank
|
| 380.8 | | COMET::STEWART | Beep if you Bop | Mon Nov 16 1987 11:02 | 9 |
| There are a few articles posted to various conferences about things
theoretical. One such note is in DREGS::MUSIC -- "So you wanta
learn about theory, huh?" -- Note #188. In this file there is a
discussion of the Circle of 5ths at Note #186. Sprinkled throughout
this conference are different technique type discussions that sometimes
delve into theoretical issues, e.g. using different modes. The
very first note (I believe) is about blues scales.
=ken
|
| 380.9 | ??????? | WLDWST::JENSEN | | Mon Nov 16 1987 11:14 | 3 |
| Is'nt this notes file a column in it self?
Mark
|