[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference csc32::consolemanager

Title:POLYCENTER Console Manager
Notice:Kits, Scans, Docs on CSC32:: as PCM$KITS:,PCM$DOCS:, PCM$SCANS:
Moderator:CSC32::BUTTERWORTH
Created:Thu Aug 06 1992
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1541
Total number of notes:6564

644.0. "ACCVIO again in EXTRACT after ARCHIVING" by UTRTSC::DORLAND (There's always one more bug!) Wed Mar 08 1995 10:54

    
    	Hello,
    
    	again I have to report an ACCVIO in EXTRACT. This
    	was reported to me by a customer. I was able to reproduce
    	it the same way as the customer did.
    
    	1) Do a CONSOLE ARCHIVE (until yesterday).
    	This leaves you with some small new log files for that
    	node.
    	
    	2) Now do a CONSOLE EXTRACT/SINCE=TODAY (this will
    	   not use the ARCHIVEd DATA)
    
    	This results in the ACCVIO :
        %SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=01, virtual
        address=00355A00, PC=00071CAC, PSL=0BC00004
    
        Improperly handled condition, image exit forced.
    
            Signal arguments              Stack contents
    
            Number = 00000005                003201D8
            Name   = 0000000C                00000000
                     00000001                2FFC0000
                     00355A00                7FEDCB04
                     00071CAC                7FEDCAD4
                     0BC00004                00087E49
                                             00000001
                                             00000001
                                             00322790
                                             00000001
    
    
    	I can reproduce this with several nodes.
    	Extract is version 1.5-007, Archive is 1.5-006.
        If needed I have
    	the logfiles available on UTRTSC::DUMPS:[DORLAND]UTRACK.*
    
    	My (wild) guess is that ARCHIVE somehow screws up
    	the log-files.
    
    	Any suggestions?
    
    	Regards, Ton
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name		DateLines
644.1OPG::SIMONSimon Jackson @reo 830 X3879Wed Mar 08 1995 11:495
Ton,
    is it the same customer for whom you have the IPMT open? If so please update
the IPMT and if not rasie a new one for us.

Cheers Simon...
644.2I'll raise a new IPMT...UTRTSC::DORLANDThere's always one more bug!Thu Mar 09 1995 11:045
    This is not one of the CLD which is currently open.
    We had this problem some time ago but could not reproduce
    it. However I will open a new IPMT case for it.
    
    Regards, Ton