|  | Connie,
  Good point,
  Logging of data will occur normally, its just that duplicate
  entries will be in the times files, this is legal and expected.
  Now, what is this going to affect?
  I dont beleive any of the interfaces really care about the
  timestamps in the log and archive files unless you need to
  specifically go for a time, such as "FIND TIME" within the
  Monitor interface. In this case you will be able to find
  the same time twice unless you are going for an absolute
  time, in which case I am not sure which one of the duplicates
  you will get!
  What are your customers specific concerns?
Cheers,
Phil
 | 
|  | Phil -
    
    Customer concerns are varied depending on their environment, however
    former VCS customers were advised via Release Notes as to the steps to
    avoid VCS rolling over when it encountered duplicate keys based on
    timestamps.
EXTRACT FROM DOCUMENT:    "VAXcluster Console System 1.4 Release Notes"
"VCS uses the VMS system time (in the system time 64-bit format) for time
stamping the received console data. That time stamp is also used as the
index key in the VCS RMS console and event log files. When a time change
occurs on the VCS host system (especially when Daylight Savings Time is set
in the Fall), the risk of duplicated keys exists during the overlapping
time period. This problem is inherent to the way VMS maintains the clock
time."   [The workaround follows this text.]
    
    Another concern for customers will be customized ENS actions that are
    dependent on EXTRACT data with checks against timestamps.  I personally
    know of number of customers doing some fancy checks.  Do you think an
    ARCHIVE or some other strategy might be used to avoid problems?  Could
    you do some testing so that we can say ...Engineering recommends blah?
    
    Thanks again,
    Connie
    
    
    
 | 
|  | Connie,
  The VCS statement is irrelevent for PCM as we dont use indexed
  files (or at least not RMS indexed ones!). All our files point
  to offsets within each other, we only use the time file to get
  the actual time of the line of log data. Events have their own
  timestamp within the event file.
  Extract will find the FIRST occurence of a particular time and
  work forwards from their, so if the ask for 00:15 onwards, they
  will possibly get an extract containing two 00:15 timestamps.
  I dont beleive archiving will help in the current version of the
  product as all that happens in a review is that several archive
  files are "appended" the resulting data is then what is reported
  against.
Cheers,
Phil
 |