|  | Date Of Receipt: 	11-APR-1996 10:30:16.66
From: 	SMURF::FLUME::slrundba "Susan Rundbaken USG  11-Apr-1996 1024"
To: 	[email protected]
CC: 	slrundba@DEC:.zko.flume
Subj: 	I18N and Makefiles...
Hello! I sent this message to odehelp and got a response indicating that all 
build issues should be sent to you...
------- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: slrundba
Received: from bwasted.zk3.dec.com by falpha.zk3.dec.com; 
(5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/20May95-1022AM)
	id AA28754; Thu, 11 Apr 1996 10:23:02 -0400
Received: from scarlett.zk3.dec.com by fwasted.zk3.dec.com; 
(5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/18Feb95-1123AM)
	id AA00265; Thu, 11 Apr 1996 10:23:01 -0400
Received: from localhost by scarlett.zk3.dec.com 
(5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/23Feb96-1110AM)
	id AA08661; Thu, 11 Apr 1996 10:20:25 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
To: odehelp
Cc: slrundba
Subject: I18N and Makefiles...
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 96 10:20:24 -0400
From: slrundba
X-Mts: smtp
Hello! I'm an engineer on the LSM team. We are focusing our efforts on the next 
release of LSM. Included is the internationalization of our code. I'm running 
into a problem incorporating I18N into our Makefiles. How do the MSGHDRS and 
CATDEFS targets get built? If I put these rules in a Makefile that includes 
OFILES, it works fine. If I put them in a Makefile by themselves or in another 
command's Makefile that doesn't specify OFILES, it won't build. The rules are 
simply ignored. Why? Is that just a coincidence, and there's really another 
trigger? If so, what is it?
When we incorporated I18N to LSM in Platinum, we put the I18N rules in a 
Makefile in our /common directory that happened to include OFILES. That meant 
that everytime an engineer made a change to the message source file, he/she had 
to build that directory which took a long time. It made sense to put the rules 
there at the time as all of our 'common' stuff is in there. The build process 
became so cumbersome, however, we decided to try a different approach in Steel, 
but now we are running into problems.
I believe that Steve Corbin, another LSM engineer, already sent you guys mail 
regarding this problem. He never got a response, so we thought we'd try again.
Any input you can provide will be appreciated.
Thank you, 
Susan Rundbaken
LSM Engineer
[email protected]
------- End of Forwarded Message
 |