| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 646.1 | Label those [tbs]s | CLOSET::ANKLAM |  | Mon Jul 13 1987 09:59 | 7 | 
|  |     
    put a <p> before each [tbs] and the spacing will be correct. DOCUMENT
    would really like everyone to label every text element (even if
    it's a [tbs]) and to have at least one text element between <headn>
    tags.
    
    
 | 
| 646.2 | add the <p> to the LSE templates | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Mon Jul 13 1987 11:29 | 13 | 
|  |     This suggests that the LSE templates for <HEADx> should automatically
    include the <p>. This is a case where user convenience should override
    the purist view.  The purist view is that the LSE token, in this case
    HEADx, should only expand to text that corresponds to the <headx> tag
    and its parameter.  This view is ok for traditional programming
    languages, which have a rigid, (mostly) context-free grammar, but
    should be relaxed for VAX DOCUMENT, which has lots of context-sensitive
    requirements. 
    
    There may be a fair number of other LSE templates that would benefit
    from including an automatic <p>.
    
       Gary
 | 
| 646.3 | Not always a paragraph | BUNSUP::LITTLE | Todd Little, New York Area SWS, 323-4475 | Mon Jul 13 1987 12:26 | 8 | 
|  |     One minor problem that has been discussed before is that a paragraph
    doesn't HAVE to follow a <HEADx>.  There could be some other text
    element like a figure or example that would be equally acceptable.
    Maybe with LSE idea of leading and trailing stuff one could have
    a <P> generated as long as another tag wasn't entered.  Should be
    an interesting placeholder definition to say the least.
    
    -tl
 | 
| 646.4 | Make the <p> optional? | COOKIE::JOHNSTON |  | Mon Jul 13 1987 14:29 | 7 | 
|  | Would it be possible to expand <head> tags into something like this:
<head1>({text}\[symbol-name])
[<p>]
Rose
 | 
| 646.5 |  | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Mon Jul 13 1987 15:04 | 20 | 
|  |     Actually, I think it would be better to expand <headX> into something
    like 
    
    	<headX>({text}\[symbol-name])
    
    	<p>[new-paragraph]
    
    with the leading punctuation for new-paragraph defined to be <p>. The
    disadvantage is that it forces the paragraph text to be on the same
    line as the <p>; unfortunately, LSE won't look for leading punctuation
    on the previous line (at least it didn't the last time I checked).
    
    Alternatively, you might want 
    
    	<headX>({text}\[symbol-name])
    	[new-paragraph]
    
    with new-paragraph expanding into the appropriate <p> and {text}.
       Gary
 | 
| 646.6 | <p>( ... ) is an error. | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER |  | Mon Jul 13 1987 15:39 | 7 | 
|  |     <p> tags ought to always have either a space or a end-of-line
    following them.  YOu may decide to put the paragraph in parentheses
    and if you write <p>(By the way, ...) you get a GTMAXARGS error
    message from tag translation.  Forming the habit of putting
    <p> tags on lines by themselves (or following them with a space)
    avoids the problem.          bill
    
 | 
| 646.7 | Star light, star bright... | BUNSUP::LITTLE | Todd Little, New York Area SWS, 323-4475 | Mon Jul 13 1987 17:44 | 4 | 
|  |     I like the suggestion offered in .5 as modified by .6.  Any chance
    this being done for T1.1?
    
    -tl
 |