| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 308.1 |  | CUPOLA::HAKKARAINEN | Albatross! | Mon Apr 27 1987 10:42 | 15 | 
|  |     Remembering that we're marking elements of text, not providing
    formatting instructions, I don't think that multiple <p>'s should
    be gobbled by Document. The intuitive behavior that I expect is
    that Document should give me consistent output for my input. 
    
    There is no implicit <p> prior to a note; the formatting requirements
    of <note> in that particular doctype call for added space. 
    
    It seems that there's a lot of extra work needed when trying to
    interpret what a user intended with a <tag_a><tag_b> combination. But,
    if something is going to be done like that, then the front-end
    processor should delete the superfluous tags, simplifying subsequent
    passes. 
    
    kh
 | 
| 308.2 | "marking text" is the point here | ATLAST::BOUKNIGHT | Everything has an outline | Mon Apr 27 1987 12:50 | 21 | 
|  |     On the other hand, why should DOCUMENT do anything with a <p> with
    no associated text? A <p> that stands by itself like in <p><p> causes
    white space to appear for both instances; based on your statement
    that we are "marking text", there is no text marked for the first
    <p> so why should the output reflect this with white space, as opposed
    to no effect at all?  I really want the <p> tag to work like it
    was "marking text" and cause the paragraph-start processing to occur
    when the first character of the paragraph is encountered, not when
    the tag is encountered. Seems to me that encountering an immediate
    tag such as <note> or <head1> or something that is a "major" formatting
    tag should override the effect of the <p> and cancel it, but as
    it is now, the <p> seems to "get in its licks" before the new tag
    gets a chance to do its job.
    
    The appearance of the <note> section as separated from the rest
    of the paragraph does not appear to me the reader much different
    from the same effect that a <p> tag has.  This is why I refered
    to the implicit <p> action that seems to be associated with the
    beginning of the note.
    
    
 | 
| 308.3 | guilty as charged! | GLINKA::GREENE |  | Thu Apr 30 1987 11:10 | 9 | 
|  |     I know that I "shouldn't" but I have made great use of the
    multiple <p> tag in forcing spaces (especially to make more
    space after a header, or to force a nice clean page break).
    
    I'm sure that there are many of us who have used little tricks
    like this to do what we wanted/needed because either there was
    no proper way or we just didn't know what it was.
    
    	Penelope
 | 
| 308.4 | needs thought/work | CLOSET::ANKLAM |  | Fri May 01 1987 12:30 | 12 | 
|  |     
    The use of multiple <p> tags to produce extra space is one of
    those 'holes' in the system that are current abused as 'features'.
    
    Jack is correct that we should probably discard multiple occurrences
    of <p> tags, or to discard <p> tags in front of text elements that
    provide their own spacing. Fixing this is extremely complex, and
    will require a good deal of internal work; will add to the list
    of things to look at post-V1.
    
    -patti
    
 |