| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 205.1 | <hat> in next release | CLOSET::ANKLAM |  | Tue Apr 07 1987 08:39 | 2 | 
|  |     
    
 | 
| 205.2 | Shouldn't that be <CIRCUMFLEX> ? | COOKIE::WITHERS | Le plus ca change... | Thu Apr 09 1987 12:08 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 205.3 | why can't it be hat? | CLOSET::ANKLAM |  | Thu Apr 09 1987 15:24 | 8 | 
|  |     
    I tended to use the terms that were familiar to existing TeX math
    users on the assumption that TeX's math was developed with
    familiarity of common terms. "hat" is what Knuth called it. Is this
    too cute?
    
    patti
    
 | 
| 205.4 | A tip of the <hat> to <circumflex>! | CLOSET::KAIKOW |  | Thu Apr 09 1987 16:17 | 5 | 
|  | 
I forgot what the official name of the character is in ISO 646, it
used to be "circumflex accent" (may have changed in the latest revision to the 
ISO standards), however, it is silly to use anything other than <CIRCUMFLEX>, 
i.e. remove the <hat>.
 | 
| 205.5 | hat vote here | COOKIE::JOHNSTON |  | Thu Apr 09 1987 17:54 | 3 | 
|  | I vote for "hat"; *anything* to save keystrokes!
Rose
 | 
| 205.6 | Another vote for <CIRCUMFLEX> | CRAYON::GENT | Party gone out of bounds -- B52's | Fri Apr 10 1987 07:55 | 4 | 
|  |     I vote for <CIRCUMFLEX>. Although I don't like entering long tag
    names, circumflex is the standard term (in my dictionary at least).
    
    --Andrew
 | 
| 205.7 | Did you really want to ask? | 3D::BOYACK | pithy...pithy...pithy | Fri Apr 10 1987 08:27 | 6 | 
|  |     As a two-finger fury I hate typing, but it seems right to go with
    <circumflex>. On the other hand, we don't spell out <list_element>
    and <paragraph>... (and so on -- this is a marvelous oppurtunity to
    open a rathole)
    
    Joe
 | 
| 205.8 | fwiw: | TLE::SAVAGE | Neil, @Spit Brook | Fri Apr 10 1987 09:11 | 7 | 
|  |     In statistics, "hat" is a colloquial term for a circumflex-like
    character that goes on top of a letter representing a variable,
    for example "y-hat" means a "y" with the circumflex on top. 
    
    BTW: despite my wishing to avoid typing extra characters, I side
    with the <CIRCUMFLEX> tag folks.  Perhaps in could be shortened
    to <FLEX>, or perhaps <CFLEX>?
 | 
| 205.9 | ok, ok | CLOSET::ANKLAM |  | Fri Apr 10 1987 09:14 | 8 | 
|  |     
    ok, I'll cave in. however, we've frozen the code for the FT update,
    so it'll be <hat> until Version 1, when I'll call it <circumflex>.
    
    thanks for the feedback!
    
    patti
    
 | 
| 205.10 | Since I was asked... | VIDEO::LASKO | Tim Lasko - TBU Architecture | Fri Apr 10 1987 12:45 | 6 | 
|  |     For the record, ISO 646 referes to this character (^) as CIRCUMFLEX
    ACCENT, UPWARD ARROW HEAD.  However, no subsequent ISO coding standard,
    nor ANSI X3.4-1986 (ASCII) retains the latter description.  I would
    strongly recommend calling it "circumflex" rather than "hat".  Several
    technical standards refer to the � construction as a-circumflex rather
    than a-hat.
 | 
| 205.11 | Why not user defined sysonyms file | IMAGIN::SAUNDERS | Dan Saunders @CX03 ; 522-5683 | Fri Apr 10 1987 20:32 | 3 | 
|  | Why not just have a file like Datatrieve does to allow user defined SYNONYMS.
Dan
 | 
| 205.12 | Do mathematicians say "hat" or "circumflex"? | TOPDOC::HIDER | Paul Hider | Fri Apr 10 1987 20:56 | 5 | 
|  |  
 Don't forget it *is* a *math* tag, lets not go calling it circumflex if
 it is commonly referred to in mathematical circles as a hat.
    ..Paul
 | 
| 205.13 | ho hum | 3D::BOYACK | pithy...pithy...pithy | Mon Apr 13 1987 07:44 | 1 | 
|  |     ...while we're at it, how about calling * splat...
 | 
| 205.14 |  | PDVAX::P_DAVIS | Peter Davis, X-NYer | Mon Apr 13 1987 10:21 | 8 | 
|  |     I vote for "circumflex", but I think there should be a capability
    for defining tag synonyms.  The fact that "hat" is more common in
    mathematical circles doesn't make it correct.  The character is
    also used as an accent in French, and probably other languages as
    well.  The "!" character is frequently called a "shriek" in England,
    but I don't think that term should become standard.  On the other
    hand, if there were an <EXCLAMATION_MARK> tag, I can readily imagine
    people wanting to define a shorter synonym.
 | 
| 205.15 |  | CLOSET::KAIKOW |  | Thu Apr 16 1987 10:46 | 10 | 
|  | 
1. Many mathematicians would call it the "involution operator"!
2. Although it may be invoked with a <math> tag, it is also a plain
   ASCII character (position 5/14).
3. It's use in s programming languages is not as a "hat" rather as a separate
   character ( a similar distinction may be made between LOW LINE as a 
   separate character and UNDERLINE for position 5/15 of ASCII).
 |