| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 77.1 | Most doc. needed | CLOSET::ANKLAM |  | Tue Mar 10 1987 12:12 | 31 | 
|  |     
    I think most of this can be fixed by a better explanation and an
    example in the documentation. There is no bug here. There is, however,
    a distinction to be made between the rule that normally follows
    the column headings for a table and the rule that is user-specifiable
    between constructed table headings.
    
    1. Both <table_heads> and <table_unit_heads> are output followed
       by a rule in most doctypes. If a doctype calls for a rule following
       table headings, then there will always be a rule that is the
       full column width.
    
    2. <rule> may be used when either <table_heads> or <table_unit_heads>
       are constructed using more than one tag, for example:
    
       <table_heads>(<span>(3)Name<rule>)
       <table_heads>(First\Last\Middle) 
    
        to produce:
    
                Name
    ---------------------------------
    First      Last      Middle
                               
    
    In Jack's example, if the <table_unit_heads> had a <RULE> in it,
    he would get two rules, one that is 3 columns wide under the unit
    heads and one that is the full page width. The second is the
    table units normal post-heading rule.
    
    patti
 | 
| 77.2 | thanks | ATLAST::BOUKNIGHT | Everything has an outline | Tue Mar 10 1987 12:45 | 3 | 
|  |     Thanks for the explanation.
    
    jack
 | 
| 77.3 | What about <RULE> elsewhere | HADRON::RILEY | Steve Riley, 849-3419 | Tue Mar 10 1987 14:07 | 19 | 
|  |     
    I have noticed that it is no longer possible to have <RULE> 
    to separate the rows (eg. a table with TOTAL line). Is there
    any way to achieve :-
    
               ------------------------------------
               Head_1   Head_2   Head_3   Head_4
               ------------------------------------
               xxxxxx     999      999      999
               .
               .
               .
               xxxxxx     999      999      999
               ------------------------------------
               TOTAL      999      999      999
               ------------------------------------
                                                        ?
    
                   Regards,
 | 
| 77.4 | with <span> it should work | CLOSET::ANKLAM |  | Thu Mar 12 1987 20:20 | 9 | 
|  |     
    I think that a
    
    <table_row>(<SPAN>(4)<rule>)
    
    should work.
    
    patti
    
 | 
| 77.5 | Is that safe? | BUNSUP::LITTLE | Todd Little | Mon Mar 16 1987 12:04 | 12 | 
|  | Patti, I tried the previous suggestion in a table and carried the idea
a bit further to attempt ruling between table rows by placing:
    <table_row>(<SPAN>(4)<rule>)
between each row.  Although I got something close to what I wanted, it
appeared to mess up the pagination scheme.  I believe those rows with
just the rules messed up some counter or something.  I could reproduce
the problem if you like. 
-tl
 | 
| 77.6 | no, it's not guaranteed | CLOSET::ANKLAM |  | Tue Mar 17 1987 16:50 | 8 | 
|  |     
    guess I would need to see what you are doing. <rule> isn't intended
    to be used to place a rule between every table in a table row; I
    suggested its use for occasions when it might be useful. Remember
    that a <table_row> is a full row wherever it occurs, so TeX will
    break before it or after it, with no regard to its contents.
    
    patti
 |