| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1165.1 | Join of how many tables? | TRCOA::MCMULLEN | Ken McMullen | Thu Jun 18 1992 15:16 | 8 | 
|  |     1,000,000 million rows per table - NO PROBLEM the real limitation for
    table cardinality is disk space.
    
    32 K tables in a join - who could construct/envision such a thing! The
    government must be smoking and not destroying the drugs they
    confiscate.
    
    
 | 
| 1165.2 | RE: FIPS | NOVA::FEENAN | Jay Feenan Rdb/xxx Engineering | Thu Jun 18 1992 22:18 | 5 | 
|  | please read note 933 and its replies.
cheers,
jay
 | 
| 1165.3 | Clarification? | BROKE::HIGGS | SQL is a camel in disguise | Fri Jun 19 1992 16:18 | 41 | 
|  |                     <<< Note 1165.0 by SCAACT::ADISESHAN >>>
	I think you need to go back and clarify what is meant by some of
	these terms:
							Req'd
							for
				Rdb	Oracle	AS/400	FIPS 127-1?
				---	------	------	-----------
Data-types:
Character			yes	___	___     ___
Decimal				no_  	___	___     ___
Packed decimal			no_	___	___ 	___ 
Floating point			yes	___	___	___
Null Value			yes	___	___     ___
Logical Data			no_	___	___     ___
 
	1) Please have them define what is meant by 'data-types'.
	   For example, Rdb can define columns within a table as
	   being of type DECIMAL or NUMERIC (along with other types).
	   And the host variable types that correspond to these types
	   are also supported (in those languages that support them)
	   But the physical representation on disk is not in DECIMAL
	   or NUMERIC form.   So we could say that Rdb supports 
	   Decimal/Packed decimal, or not, depending on the customer's
	   definition.
	2) What is meant by Decimal, as opposed to Packed decimal?
	   It could be that they mean NUMERIC when they use the term
	   Decimal, and DECIMAL when they use the term Packed decimal,
	   but I don't know.
	3) What do they mean by logical data?   Boolean?   Enumerations?
	   Something else?
	Bryan
 | 
| 1165.4 | Comments...no direct answers | COOKIE::MELTON | The zen of character sets | Sat Jun 20 1992 00:38 | 15 | 
|  | I'd like to echo Bryan's comments in .3; the table that you supplied in .0
is a bit ambiguous, so it's hard to know what they really want.
Also, the last 2 lines of the "Database-limits" section are absurd.
Nobody (and I mean "nobody"!) would really want 32,768 tables in a view or
in a join.  Perhaps this was a simple typographical error and "32" was
intended instead of "32K"?  The other values are reasonable.
As far as FIPS 127-1 goes, I no longer know where my copy is, but I'm
quite sure that Steve Horn must have a copy (or know where to access one).
After all, Rdb/VMS must have had one to ensure that their limits covered
those required by the FIPS.
Good luck,
   Jim
 |