| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1134.1 |  | KYOA::KOCH | It never hurts to ask... | Thu Apr 09 1992 13:48 | 9 | 
|  |     In my experience, Oracle charges according to what we call "Traditional
    Pricing". If we can't talk the customer out of Oracle, Oracle charges
    what they want. They charge for each CPU. Five year cost of ownership
    is outrageous. Remember, this is how they make their money. Unless the
    customer threatens to use another lower cost product, Oracle will get
    the price they want.
    
    What do they think they are getting by using Oracle? Why did they
    choose it?
 | 
| 1134.2 | Must be ORACLE | ZPOVC::HONGNGEE |  | Mon Apr 13 1992 11:16 | 13 | 
|  |                      <<< Note 1134.0 by ZPOVC::HONGNGEE >>>
                          -< Oracle in DSSI Cluster >-
This is a win win situation for ORACLE, as the customer is purchasing a 
package that runs on ORACLE. Not much of a choice really. However, we 
understand that in America, ORACLE is giving very attractive discount for 
their second licence. May be we will try to approach it this way over here.
Thanks for the feedback.
Rgds,
Hong Ngee
 | 
| 1134.3 | You can call me a schemer... | MBALDY::LANGSTON | The secret is strong ears. | Wed Apr 15 1992 22:01 | 7 | 
|  | ...but one thing that would probably encourage Oracle to lower their price is
if the customer tells them that it's too expensive and starts looking at 
another package that runs on ... oh, say Rdb (yeah that's it! >-{) ).
There's no reason not to try this for *your* customer.
Bruce
 |