| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1058.1 | My 2 cents worth... | KYOA::KOCH | It never hurts to ask... | Tue Jan 14 1992 05:30 | 9 |
| I believe there are references in this notes file pointing to documents
concerning cost. However, their is one that Oracle can NOT compete with
at this point. It is the free RUN-TIME license after an application is
developed. Any application can be deployed at NO cost after
development.
Does Oracle provide a public and stable interface for third party
tools? I know that product management can provide this information for
you.
|
| 1058.2 | Trifox is compiled | TRCOA::MCMULLEN | Ken McMullen | Tue Jan 14 1992 14:21 | 3 |
| Trifox's tools are also compiled (as opposed to Oracles interpretive
SQeaL*FORMS). The overhead with Trifox and Rdb or an Oracle database
would be less.
|
| 1058.3 | | CSC32::S_MAUFE | hottub and chains weather | Thu Jan 16 1992 00:03 | 7 |
| 1058.4 | Still in there... | NOVA::HORN | Steve Horn, Database Systems | Thu Jan 16 1992 15:56 | 7 |
| T'would be best to NOT spread rumors Simon! That is NOT true. The
current VMS/NAS plans keep Rdb/VMS Runtime in the VMS license. What
might get taken out is the SQL/Services Server, which would be shipped
in NAS200. Makes sense since the Server is useless without the stuff
that's in NAS200!!
Steve
|