|  |     Ok, get set for the list of participants (november 1990, 39 members)
    
    Amdahl, Arix, AT&T, Bull S.A., Computer Associates, Compaq, Contol Data
    Corp., Data General, Digital Equipment, Fujitsu America, Hewlett
    Packard, Hitachi Ltd, IBM, ICL, Informix, Ingres, Intel, ITOM International
    Corp, MIPS Computer, Mitsubishi Electric Corp, NCR, NEC Corp, OKI
    Electric Industry, Olivetti, Oracle, Prime Computer, Pyramid
    Technology, Sequent Computer, Sequoia Systems, Siemens A.G., Software
    A.G., Stratus Computer, Sun Microsystems, Sybase, Tandem Computers,
    Teradata Corp., Unify Corp, Unisys, Wang Laboratories.
    
    
    Founder was Omri Selin from ITOM International. Don't know of any
    positions of companies within the TPC.
    
    Henny Olthof, TP-DB Netherlands
 | 
|  | re: 823.8  TPC-B results, not accepted yet
  �  As far as I know, Oracle has only published TPC-B numbers until now.
  �  And even those numbers are still not accepted by the TPC as they did
  �  not pass all the test they need to (like ACID, clause 2).
  �  
  �  Henny Olthof, TP-DB Netherlands
  What does "not accepted by the TPC" mean, and what are the competitive sales
  implications?  Is there some public, on-the-record comment by some TPC 
  official to that effect?  Whose numbers *have* been accepted? 
  Even if our 4.0 numbers have been "accepted," I don't know that we'd want to
  brag about it.  I'm still waiting for the "real" 4.0 numbers, i.e. the ones 
  that show it faster than 3.1, not slower, to come out.
  We need help telling the customers that Rdb is a wise choice.
  Bruce
 |