| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 583.1 | Competitive update 2/29/90? | ODIXIE::BONE | Osteopath | Mon Feb 26 1990 20:08 | 1 | 
|  |     
 | 
| 583.2 | not quite | AUNTB::KULVETE |  | Mon Feb 26 1990 20:13 | 7 | 
|  |     re             <<< Note 583.1 by ODIXIE::BONE "Osteopath" >>>
                        -< Competitive update 2/29/90? >-
    
    
    Not in depth enough ... the Ingres/Rdb comparison document had topics
    such as architecture, database structure, storage structure, indices, 
    views, security etc. etc. ... 36 pages in all!!!
 | 
| 583.3 | I found some info | AUNTB::KULVETE |  | Tue Feb 27 1990 16:50 | 1 | 
|  |     FYI, I found some information in the BROKE::DB_COMPETITIVE_HELP notes file.
 | 
| 583.4 | See the PW Report, too. | CLO::MOLLEY |  | Sun Mar 04 1990 18:30 | 9 | 
|  |     Dave,
    
    There is a Paine-Webber report available that gives competitive info on
    ORACLE from both a product technical perspective and a company
    financial perspective.  I think you can order reprints.
    
    Regards,
    Nik
    
 | 
| 583.5 | PW too old | MAIL::DUNCANG | Gerry Duncan @KCO - DTN 452-3445 | Sun Mar 04 1990 19:19 | 3 | 
|  |     The PW report is too old.  I personally would not send it.
    
    -- gerry
 | 
| 583.6 | No PW | NOVA::BOOTH | What am I?...An Oracle? | Fri Mar 09 1990 16:08 | 5 | 
|  |     For what it's worth, don't use the Paine Webber report. Instead, just
    give a copy of Oracle's annual report to the VP of Finance. Let them
    find the "warts" for themselves.
    
    ---- Michael Booth
 |