| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 172.1 |  | CLOSET::FITZELL | put nifty saying here | Wed Aug 02 1989 14:57 | 4 | 
|  |     There will be a new version of the online tools available later today
    that fixes this problem. 
    
    Mike
 | 
| 172.2 | Its happening again!!! | GALVIA::MBOWLER |  | Sun Dec 10 1989 14:13 | 7 | 
|  |     The problem I outlined in 172.0 is happening again!!
    
    Any suggeestions.
    
    Rgds,
    
    Mike B.
 | 
| 172.3 |  | CLOSET::FITZELL | put nifty saying here | Mon Dec 11 1989 08:56 | 11 | 
|  |     How about what version of document you're using what level of the
    online tools you're using. What version of whatever tool was used to
    create the graphic. .0 was put in 4 months ago there's been updates in
    most of the tools used to build books we need to know what baselevels
    you're working at before we can make any suggestions. 
    
    The problem described in .0 was fixed a couple of baselevels ago if
    you're using the latest tools as described in note 64 post a pointer 
    to the file here or via mail and we'll take a look at it.
    
    Mike
 | 
| 172.4 | Panic over... | GALVIA::MBOWLER |  | Tue Dec 12 1989 13:31 | 23 | 
|  |     Mike,
    
    It's OK, I've solved the problem myself.  I was using the wrong file
    types.
    
    Thanks for your prompt reply,
    
    Mike B.
    
    PS. I've just noticed a problem with numbered lists if the number of
    items in the list exceeds 9, the extra digit, (ie 0) tends to crowd
    into the text likt this:
    
      8 Blah blah...
      9 Blah blah....
      10More blah blah...
    
    
     Any solutions for this?
    
    Thanks.
    
    Mike B.
 | 
| 172.5 | List problem fixed | VAXUUM::GRANT | I've saved $2247.00 since I quit smoking. | Tue Dec 12 1989 14:34 | 4 | 
|  |     RE: .4
    The list element number spacing problem is fixed in the next release.
    
    Wayne
 | 
| 172.6 | I hack therefore I am | ENET51::KNOWLES | Running old protocol | Mon Dec 18 1989 05:02 | 9 | 
|  |     If you can't wait for the next release, would an align_char before
    the first 9 list elements work? (If you don't want to fiddle with
    .sdml files when _your_ product is stable, you could use BEFORE and
    AFTER conditions.
    
    Personally, I'd prefer to wait for the real thing but a tech writer's
    gotta do what a tech writer's gotta do.
    
    b
 | 
| 172.7 | I hack therefore I am | ENET51::KNOWLES | Running old protocol | Mon Dec 18 1989 05:04 | 9 | 
|  |     If you can't wait for the next release, would an align_char before
    the first 9 list elements work? (If you don't want to fiddle with
    .sdml files when _your_ product is stable, you could use BEFORE and
    AFTER conditions.)
    
    Personally, I'd prefer to wait for the real thing but a tech writer's
    gotta do what a tech writer's gotta do.
    
    b
 | 
| 172.8 | Vertical line next to captured screen II | AZUR::DELACOUR |  | Thu May 10 1990 05:56 | 25 | 
|  |     Problem:
    
    When displaying either diagrams drawn in Rags or screens captured in
    Rags, vertical line(s) are appearing at the right-hand side of the
    diagram/captured screen. 
    
    It looks like the diagram/captured screen is starting to be drawn
    again. As the artwork prints out without these lines, I think the
    problem is with Bookreader.  Does anyone know why this is happening or
    how to correct it?
    
    The versions of the s/w are as follows:
    
    Bookreader - image file id  link date 5-Oct-89
    				link version 05-05
    
    VAX document - 1.2-1
    
    VMS  - 5.3-1
    
    Rags - 2.0
    
    
    	Cathy Aran
                          
 | 
| 172.9 | OLD RAGS | MJFITZ::FITZELL | put nifty saying here | Thu May 10 1990 09:13 | 12 | 
|  |     I'd suggest upgrading RAGS and trying again. The latest version of
    RAGS is 3.something 2.0 was in the time frame that the problem you are
    describing occurred. 
    
    Thank-you for the detailed listing of the various components it makes
    our job a lot easier when we see what versions of everything you're
    running. Now a nit you forgot to add what version of the online
    tools you're using.
    
    
    
    Mike 
 |