| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 4400.1 | here ? | RDGENG::WILLIAMS_A |  | Fri Feb 02 1996 11:03 | 4 | 
|  |     tech info is in Dechips conference
    
    
    AW
 | 
| 4400.2 | You'd think Intel would learn from the last time | DYPSS1::COGHILL | Steve Coghill, Luke 14:28 | Tue Mar 05 1996 14:31 | 2 | 
|  |    Does anyone know if Digital has applied the "workaround" to the
   Pentium Pro "non-problem" on our motherboards?
 | 
| 4400.3 | But, maybe they *did* learn something... | SMURF::STRANGE | Steve Strange:Digital UNIX, DCE DFS | Tue Mar 05 1996 15:36 | 7 | 
|  |     re:  -< You'd think Intel would learn from the last time >-
    
    Yeah, they did.  They put out a buggy chip, and it didn't hurt them. 
    If anything, they are more dominant now than they were 13 months ago
    or so when the Pentium FP bug was finally aknowledged.  (1/2 :-) )
    
    	Steve
 | 
| 4400.4 | Motherboard problem still here | ASDG::DFIELD | the Unit | Wed Mar 06 1996 07:36 | 14 | 
|  |     
    	RE -2
    
    	I don't think so.  We have two Celebris systems we have been trying 
    to upgrade to pentium.  The manual says you can do it, the motherboard
    has the correct connector, but call the service line and get told that
    they are incompatible.  The fix is alledgedly a BIOS upgrade that has 
    no due date and has been on the books for 6 months.   No wonder we are
    getting out of the home PC business.  If I personnally owned these PC's
    they would be upgraded or they would be exchanged.  But I guess I don't
    understand the vaguaries of the market...
    
    
    DanF
 |