| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 4315.1 | pointer | DYPSS1::DYSERT | Barry - Custom Software Development | Mon Dec 11 1995 08:47 | 4 | 
|  |     I can't answer your question, but perhaps you'd do better asking in
    DECWET::DECCXX.
    
    	BD�
 | 
| 4315.2 | I'm not a developer (just the writer) but... | CASDOC::SAVAGE | Neil Savage | Mon Dec 11 1995 12:06 | 12 | 
|  |     Doesn't the answer depend on what "supported" means?   DEC C++ is the
    only one Digital supports.  Way back at the beginning of development of
    DEC C++ there used to be Oregon C++, or something like that. And I
    think Gnu C++.  But these have all been surpassed by DEC C++, to my
    knowledge.   
    
    There's probably nothing comparable to DEC C++ that runs on OpenVMS.
    Borland's, MicroSoft's, and such C++ products that are cutting edge run
    on PCs.  
    
    But did you know you can simulate AT&t's cfront and VC++ within DEC C++
    by using a switch?
 | 
| 4315.3 | GNU C++ is still around | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Mon Dec 11 1995 13:20 | 6 | 
|  |     GNU C++ for OpenVMS is still out there (according to a quick AltaVista
    Web search; COOL search engine BTW!!!).
    
    DEC C++ may have the features, but GNU C++ has the platforms (including
    Linux) and the price.  You may or may not want to bet-your-business on
    it, but it is there and viable.
 | 
| 4315.4 |  | STAR::PARKE | True Engineers Combat Obfuscation | Mon Dec 11 1995 15:46 | 5 | 
|  |     Actually, GNU C++ has been superceded.  It's part of GNU C, in the
    same compiler, has been merged for a while.
    
    Bill
    
 | 
| 4315.5 | rathole alert | DYPSS1::DYSERT | Barry - Custom Software Development | Mon Dec 11 1995 16:36 | 13 | 
|  |     Re: Note 4315.3 by NEWVAX::PAVLICEK
    
    Hi Zot!
�    DEC C++ may have the features, but GNU C++ has the platforms (including
�    Linux) and the price.  You may or may not want to bet-your-business on
�    it, but it is there and viable.
    
    Hundreds of companies bet their business on inferior - though cheap! -
    products all the time. A piece of info that perhaps the Digital
    leadership may want to consider.
    
    	BD�
 | 
| 4315.6 | VAX 9000 FOREVER!!! | NEWVAX::PAVLICEK | Zot, the Ethical Hacker | Mon Dec 11 1995 22:42 | 9 | 
|  |     re: .5
    
    Gee, Barry.  You can't mean that someone would bet there business on
    INFERIOR technology???  Never!  That's why that Microsplat company will
    NEVER succeed in the corporate world!  Why, who would have one of those
    TOY PC things on their desk?!?!  And this NONSENSE about FREE software!
    No one will EVER use it!  It's a MAINFRAME world out there, after all...
    
    -- Russ, living in the Land of Make-Believe  ;^)
 | 
| 4315.7 | Specific customer issues being discussed offline | TLE::BECKLEY |  | Tue Dec 12 1995 08:53 | 6 | 
|  |     Discussion of the particular customer issues that prompted the base
    note has been taken offline so that we can deal with them more
    effectively.  Anyone who wants to throw their two cents in about other
    C++ compilers shipping on OpenVMS is still welcome to do so.
    
    Nancy Beckley, DEC C++ Engineering Manager
 |