| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 4164.1 |  | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Tue Oct 03 1995 20:02 | 5 | 
|  | 
	I do, but I'd want it back.
							mike
 | 
| 4164.2 | I have one you can BORROW | WRKSYS::RICHARDSON |  | Thu Oct 05 1995 12:00 | 3 | 
|  |     Me, too, and likewise: I'd like it back someday.
    
    /Charlotte 
 | 
| 4164.3 |  | STAR::FENSTER | Yaacov Fenster, Process Improvement, Quality & Testing tools @ZK | Thu Oct 05 1995 12:42 | 1 | 
|  |     Have manual, will lend for network bandwidth. :-)
 | 
| 4164.4 | Got one - Thanks! | STOWOA::BMITCHELL | Ars gratia moolah | Thu Oct 05 1995 18:08 | 5 | 
|  | 
 We got one this afternoon (thanks Bill!) that we get to keep - that's what 
we needed.  Thanks very much for all the offers.  Is this a great company 
or what?!
 | 
| 4164.5 |  | CSOA1::LENNIG | Dave (N8JCX), MIG, @CYO | Thu Oct 05 1995 21:51 | 5 | 
|  |     I thought I remembered seeing a memo that came out sometime after it
    was published that basically said it had been withdrawn; engr weren't
    supposed to use it, rather to use the previous version...
    
    Dave
 | 
| 4164.6 |  | PERFOM::WIBECAN | Acquire a choir | Fri Oct 06 1995 09:15 | 4 | 
|  | Where does one hear these things?  This is the first I've heard that we even
HAVE such a thing as a Software Engineering Manual.
						Brian
 | 
| 4164.7 |  | TLE::REAGAN | All of this chaos makes perfect sense | Fri Oct 06 1995 09:27 | 6 | 
|  |     It wasn't much a manual as it was trying to write down some of the
    existing process, some goodness, etc.  Much of Digital has changed
    since 1988 so I would take the manual with a large grain of salt
    (perhaps an entire saltlick for those you who are near livestock).
    
    				-John
 | 
| 4164.8 | a prior life | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | A Quinn Martin Production | Fri Oct 06 1995 09:57 | 12 | 
|  | I was on a project that tried to follow that standard "to the letter" and the
project failed - (that was not the entire reason but it was in the top ten
reasons).
I think I recall seeing something later on that the book was to be used "as a
guide" and not be followed to the letter.  
If you try to meet each step there will be so much paperwork and overhead
NOTHING will get done... hmm now wait a second - what does that remind me of...
was that book not intended for engineers? :-)
bjm
 | 
| 4164.9 |  | DRDAN::KALIKOW | DIGITAL=DEC: ReClaim TheName&Glory! | Sat Oct 07 1995 14:52 | 4 | 
|  |     Hmmm.   One hopes that the job trackings, work descriptions, promotion
    procedures, & the like for the SW Engineering Organization have
    undergone a commensurate change.
    
 | 
| 4164.10 | PS File? | TPOVC::BONGESCUADRA |  | Tue Oct 22 1996 09:07 | 3 | 
| 4164.11 | Have bookreader version | BOOKIE::CATANO |  | Tue Oct 22 1996 11:22 | 8 |