| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 3114.1 | I've heard different..... | MSDOA::SCRIVEN |  | Thu May 26 1994 13:11 | 7 | 
|  |     I've "heard" that the entire MCS organization, including New Business
    and BASE Sales, Service Delivery, and possibly our contract
    administration will be sold.  
    
    Aren't rumours fun?
    
    Toodles.....JP
 | 
| 3114.2 |  | FREEBE::REAUME | click -- buzz -- whirr | Thu May 26 1994 13:13 | 6 | 
|  |       It wouldn't surprise me, but does it make sense with MCS being
    a money maker to let it go? So much for value-added service!
    
      And so much for competing with third parties.
    
    							-John R-
 | 
| 3114.3 | Who'd buy anything else... | MSDOA::SCRIVEN |  | Thu May 26 1994 13:19 | 5 | 
|  |     Yep!  It's a money maker alright.  Unfortunately, you can't sell stuff
    that isn't successful....  This and maybe storage are (IMhO) the only
    moneymakers that someone might want to buy....
    
    JP                                                              
 | 
| 3114.4 |  | HANNAH::KOVNER | Everything you know is wrong! | Thu May 26 1994 13:31 | 4 | 
|  | Well, I doubt there will be an announcement Monday - Tuesday maybe, but not
Memorial Day.
As for the substance of the rumor, I have no idea.
 | 
| 3114.5 |  | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Thu May 26 1994 14:36 | 9 | 
|  | 
	As systems are becoming more reliable and have longer MTBF's, it
	makes sense to "ditch" Field Service now and take the $$ it
	would bring in. 
	Just one DECcies opinion,
							mike
 | 
| 3114.6 | losers can become winners | ICS::BRAUER |  | Thu May 26 1994 15:11 | 14 | 
|  |     RE .3   
    
    It has been mentioned elsewhere here, I believe, that an operation 
    that isn't profitable within Digital can still become profitable 
    outside ... e.g. because it isn't burdened with overheads; because 
    it fits well into some other company's business model or product set 
    etc. ... 
    
    So we don't just have to sell "the jewels". 
    
    Value is in the eye of the beholder.
    
    Best,
    Martin 
 | 
| 3114.7 |  | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB |  | Thu May 26 1994 16:42 | 19 | 
|  |     if you look at what Digital has done with field circus recently
    the rumour isn't all that surprising.
    
    Digital already uses sub contractors to provide service in remote
    areas and hires temps whenever needed to cover shortages and projects.
    
    More and more the "Digital Difference" is just lip service.
    (no pun intended)
    
    Digital MCS is also getting its butt kicked up and down the street
    by TPM's because our pricing is sooo high, because we're trying to
    support the rest of the company.
    
    
    IMO
    
    Brian V
    Mister Good Screw' (driver)
    
 | 
| 3114.8 |  | NWD002::RANDALL_DO |  | Thu May 26 1994 19:15 | 3 | 
|  |     I thought Digital Consulting was getting its butt kicked up and down
    the street, because its pricing was too high, because IT was supporting
    the rest of the company.
 | 
| 3114.9 |  | STOWOA::ODIAZ | Octavio, Dev. Suppt. Svcs - MCS/SPS | Fri May 27 1994 11:33 | 2 | 
|  |     
    Direct from John Rando's at an MCS/SPS meeting: MCS is not up for sale.
 |