| Title: | The Digital way of working |
| Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL ON |
| Created: | Fri Feb 14 1986 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 5321 |
| Total number of notes: | 139771 |
Moderator: I did not receive permission from the author to reprint this
announcement. I assume because of the way it is addressed, that it
can be treated as company knowledge. If this is not the case,
please remove it.
TO: ALL U.S.A. PCBU EMPLOYEES
F
FF
F FROM: ENRICO PESATORI
SUBJECT: U.S.A. SALARY PROGRAM FOR CY94
I am pleased to be able to share with you the outline of the PCBU Salary
Program for this year. More details of the program will be provided to
your manager, to whom you should address any questions.
This year, we are taking the first step on a new path that will result
in all PCBU employees having an opportunity to benefit from the expected
success of the PCBU. We all know the tasks before us are difficult and
will require sacrifice. By working together, I believe we can meet and
beat our business goals. A core principle in our compensation strategy
is that meeting and beating our business goals should result in higher
levels of compensation for PCBU employees.
The overall PCBU U.S. Salary Program departs from traditional Digital
practice in a number of ways and is a major first step in aligning our
reward practices to the PC market.
The first change is that we will be moving everyone to a base salary
review date of early August (this year 04 August 94). This will enable
decisions on pay to be based on the prior fiscal year results. A few
market-related adjustments may be made in March. In future years, we
will continue to link our single focal date to the Company's fiscal year
end.
The second change relates to the basis on which base salary increases
are given. We have developed a practice inside the Company where
everyone expects an increase every year without much focus on the ending
pay level. This approach has caused pay rates to get out of line with
market practice. This year, and in the future, we will focus on ending
pay levels.
The third change is an explicit recognition that everyone inside the
PCBU makes a difference and contributes to the achievement of our
overall goals. I am pleased to announce that, if the business goals for
FY94 are exceeded, everyone not covered in a Management or Sales
Incentive arrangement will receive an additional 2% of their annual
salary (approximately "one weeks pay"). This will be paid as a cash
lump sum in August. The exact goals will be communicated verbally by
your manager during the next few weeks.
This is a significant change which we are modelling within the Company
in the USA. We plan to build on this change in future years.
Finally, the fourth change relates to individuals whose base salary is
already well-positioned under the ending pay comparison with the market.
In these circumstances, no increase in base salary should be expected.
However, a few people in this category who make an outstanding
contribution will be awarded a cash lump sum payment in recognition of
that contribution.
Details on all of the above will be available to your manager in the
next few days. If you have any questions, please ask your manager.
I believe this program provides us with the best possible approach
during our time of growth within the context of the overall Company
performance. Your sustained efforts and contributions are much
appreciated.
Best regards,
Enrico Pesatori
/ct
Distribution:
[Deleted]
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2960.1 | WLDBIL::KILGORE | Time to put the SHARE back in DCU! | Fri Mar 25 1994 16:31 | 6 | |
.0> We have developed a practice inside the Company where
.0> everyone expects an increase every year...
What company was that?
| |||||
| 2960.2 | MSBCS::BROWN_L | Fri Mar 25 1994 16:37 | 7 | ||
Since Pesatori recently claimed he'd have Digital in the top 5
PC vendors (by system shipments, we're currently 13th) by the
end of FY95, perhaps there should be some financial incentives
for him if he accomplishes his goal. On the other hand, he should
also be held to his commitment, and should be willing to take a pay
cut if the goal is not reached... but you can bet that'll
never happen. .02KB
| |||||
| 2960.3 | SPECXN::WITHERS | Bob Withers | Fri Mar 25 1994 17:28 | 18 | |
Well, everyone expects a raise every year. It takes slightly longer to actually achieve that! BobW Not sure whether it should be 8-( or 8-) >================================================================================ >Note 2960.1 Salary, PCBU...comments? 1 of 2 >WLDBIL::KILGORE "Time to put the SHARE back in DCU!" 6 lines 25-MAR-1994 16:31 >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >.0> We have developed a practice inside the Company where >.0> everyone expects an increase every year... > > What company was that? > > | |||||
| 2960.4 | LATVMS::BRANAM | Tue Mar 29 1994 12:22 | 13 | ||
I think it is an interest motivational strategy to offer the 2% bonus if goals are met. The issue then centers around realistic goals. If the stated goal is "grow by 25%", I would be a little skeptical, since I doubt that it could. If the growth was actually a healthy 20% because everyone was pushing hard, the goal would not have been met, and no bonus. Let this happen more than once and the 2% bonus is no longer an incentive. So the key is honest, achievable goals, high enough to challenge, but not so high as to be unattainable. The danger is end-of-period pushes to meet the goal. If poor product goes out the door so the goal will have been met on the books, it may come flying back in product returns and poor customer satisfaction. You have to satisfy a customer every time, but you only have to annoy him once. | |||||
| 2960.5 | It's called taking risks and using initiative | NOVA::SWONGER | DBS Software Quality Engineering | Tue Mar 29 1994 13:03 | 10 |
I think it's interesting just because > The overall PCBU U.S. Salary Program departs from traditional Digital > practice in a number of ways Once again, we see that the successful parts of this company are doing something that departs from the "tradition" of DEC. I don't think it's a coincidence. Roy | |||||
| 2960.6 | Western Movie Mode | NACAD::SHERMAN | Steve NETCAD::Sherman DTN 226-6992, LKG2-A/R05 pole AA2 | Tue Mar 29 1994 13:46 | 8 |
re: .5
I figure Digital is running in "Western Movie" mode. Basically, the
successful areas of the companies are those that have circled their
wagons for protection. Those outside the wagon circles are running
around buck naked, trying to find a good place to dodge bullets.
Steve
| |||||