| Title: | The Digital way of working |
| Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL ON |
| Created: | Fri Feb 14 1986 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 5321 |
| Total number of notes: | 139771 |
Could someone post the vacation accrual policy that will be taking
effect in the near future? I can't seem to find it anywhere.
Thanks
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2616.1 | 5 weeks max after Jan 1996 | DCPWR::CROSS | Thu Aug 12 1993 12:31 | 50 | |
Hi,
I asked this question last month, and I friend forwarded this to me
from "vtx policy vacation". You could check and see if it has
changed, but I would expect it is still true.
Regards,
John Cross
*************************************************************************
Screen 13 of 14
VACATION PAY ADMINISTRATION Cont'd
distribute vacation pay prior to the start of the employee's
vacation. Advance vacation pay is not given in less than full week
increments.
| VACATION ACCUMULATION CHANGE NOTICE
| Effective January 1996, the Vacation Policy will be revised to
| establish a 5 week maximum on unused vacation for all employees,
| regardless of their years of service.
< VACATION PAY ADMINISTRATION | VACATION ACCUMULATI... Cont'd
Vacation Effective: 06-JUL-93
Section: 4.03
Screen 14 of 14
| VACATION ACCUMULATION CHANGE NOTICE Cont'd
| As with the current policy, accrual vacation hours will stop when
| the maximum is reached. It will resume when vacation hours are
| taken and unused hours drop below the maximum.
< | VACATION ACCUMULATION CHANGE NOTICE
| |||||
| 2616.2 | Thanks! | POBOX::TSUCHIYAMA | Gary Tsuchiyama @CPO DTN 447-2812 | Thu Aug 12 1993 14:04 | 1 |
| 2616.3 | Found by a DIR/TITLE=VACATION | BSS::CODE3::BANKS | Not in SYNC -> SUNK | Thu Aug 12 1993 14:16 | 8 |
Re:<<< Note 2616.0 by POBOX::TSUCHIYAMA "Gary Tsuchiyama @CPO DTN 447-2812" >>>
> Could someone post the vacation accrual policy that will be taking
> effect in the near future? I can't seem to find it anywhere.
Also discussed at *great* length in Topic 2302... :-)
- David
| |||||