| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1938.1 | | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | Patrick Sweeney VMS/WNT/XOU... | Fri Jun 12 1992 08:06 | 12 |
| OK, Inspire me.
What is Digital's plan to restore the company to profitability?
Will Digital regain or give up the role it has an alternative supplier
of computers to IBM from the desktop to the data center, to Sun, Apple,
or HP? Or will Digital shrink to half its 1991 size and become a niche
competitor with a stable-to-shrinking base?
I need more than the assertion that the plan exists or that because
Digital has recovered from other setbacks, recovery from this is
assured.
|
| 1938.2 | | SMEGIT::ARNOLD | Walk softly, carry a megawatt laser | Fri Jun 12 1992 11:39 | 22 |
| re .0, "let the customer to them sweat"
There's absolutely no reason for a Digit to have a customer see him/her
sweat. One thing that's become painfully obvious to me is that Digital
can no longer "do it all". Before anybody starts flaming replies, let
me qualify that. Digital *needs* our third party software vendors for
*many* applications that we just don't do, or at best don't do well or
cost-effectively. Digital *can* "do it all" from a Systems Integration
point of view, but there's many people within Digital these days who
refuse to believe that we don't have the ability *within Digital* to
"do it all" anymore.
And imho, there's nothing wrong with that. As long as the ultimate
customer has a single point of contact (ie, Digital) who is willing
(and getting paid) to take the responsibility for integrating umpteen
different pieces of hardware/software into one cohesive solution, I
don't think that's a reason for a Digit to sweat it in front of a
customer. We do, however, need to let our people know that the way we
do business today is *not* the same way we did business 5-10 years ago.
imho
Jon
|
| 1938.3 | where's the beef? | SGOUTL::BELDIN_R | All's well that ends | Fri Jun 12 1992 11:40 | 18 |
| This company has people at various levels of skepticism about plans,
strategies, and our ability to carry them out. Some of us have been
here long enough to see five cycles (lasting at most 2.5 years) of
"revitalization". Others are on just their first or second cycle.
Depending on how often and sincerely we believed in the past (and were
deceived by the course of events), we may view any new claims to a
"great new strategy" with a jaundiced eye.
All the hopes for the next version of "the vision" will be dashed as
the next but one takes its place.
Our skepticism will not be overcome by ad-campaigns, lip-service, or
other public-relations gimmics. We're waiting to see some meat.
fwiw,
Dick
|
| 1938.4 | No sweat - just some panic | CGOOA::DTHOMPSON | Don, of Don's ACT | Fri Jun 12 1992 15:43 | 5 |
| Perhaps our customers are not so much seeing Digits sweat as reading
their resumes. And that may be where the air of desperation is
showing.
|
| 1938.5 | Which way did you mean that? | MAY21::PSMITH | Peter H. Smith,MLO5-5/E71,223-4663,ESB | Fri Jun 12 1992 16:01 | 7 |
| Did you mean "seeing their resumes" as in, "it's obvious that Digital's
employees want to jump ship because they have lost confidence in the
company," or "seeing their resumes" as in, "it's obvious from the resumes
of Digital employees that they stopped keeping up with technology N years
ago?"
:-)
|
| 1938.6 | | JMPSRV::MICKOL | Winning with Xerox in '92 | Sun Jun 14 1992 23:48 | 17 |
| Re: .0 et al: I'm in front of customers quite a bit and although I don't
necessarily share my skepticism with where we are heading, I am honest with
them regarding the tough times we are faced with. Fortunately for me, I
BELIEVE that we have excellent people and products. Our vision, strategies and
decision-making capabilities are questionable, however. Although I don't
really see how, I do have confidence that we will deliver ourselves from this
difficult period and I think I convey that confidence to our customers.
Unfortunately, the sweat and concern I see on the faces of management makes it
all that more difficult to convey optimism in our future to our customers.
Regards,
Jim
Sales Support
Xerox/James River Account Group
Rochester, New York
|
| 1938.7 | Who's gonna do it... | LIOVAX::CRAPAROTTA | Joe, in Friendly NY.. SO WHAT!! | Mon Jun 15 1992 20:55 | 10 |
| I feel that alot of DEC employees have a real good feel that we
can and will pull out of this little dip. I for one, am starting
to wonder if our present Management can do it. Corporate keeps trying
to do the New style of management (empowerment,TQM,JIT) and all
the other new buzzwords.. Problem is our middle management still
won't let go of the 50's style... So basically we just vasilate(sp)
back and forth and make no progress at all... That's what we(in the
field) see anyway...
Joe
|
| 1938.8 | Digital hasn't changed AT ALL | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Tue Jun 16 1992 03:55 | 3 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...�
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
|
| 1938.9 | I can do my job better than my manager can . . . | CAPNET::CROWTHER | Maxine 276-8226 | Tue Jun 16 1992 09:37 | 3 |
| re .7 I agree with you, the question becomes how do we get middle
management out of the way so that we can "do the right thing"???
|
| 1938.10 | Delegate Upwards | SGOUTL::BELDIN_R | All's well that ends | Tue Jun 16 1992 09:53 | 11 |
| re .9
Keep your boss busy on the "big issues" that you don't need to worry
about.
"Hey, boss. I'm confused about the latest reorg announcment. Can you
find me something written about NMS that I can understand?"
works for me,
Dick
|
| 1938.11 | Good answer. . . | CAPNET::CROWTHER | Maxine 276-8226 | Tue Jun 16 1992 12:51 | 5 |
| re .10
I love it!! :*)
Given how fast organizations change, perhaps they could be in charge of
org charts!!
|