| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 736.1 |  | SCARY::M_DAVIS | Coffee, please. Irregular. | Fri Mar 03 1989 13:17 | 7 | 
|  |     I haven't heard anything such as that.  I'd guess that if a certain
    section of the company, say Manufacturing, were overstaffed and had
    people looking for jobs, it would be rude to hire in someone from
    another organization without looking at the "excess" folks in
    Manufacturing first... but I've not heard of any directive.
    
    Marge
 | 
| 736.2 |  | TOLKIN::KIRK | Matt Kirk, 291-8891 | Fri Mar 03 1989 14:17 | 3 | 
|  |     The last time I was looking (last summer) there were req's open for MSB-only
    or SEG-only.  Most of the MSB-only req's were actually LTN-only
    since Argonaut had just been cancelled.
 | 
| 736.3 |  | COOKIE::WITHERS | You know you can't memorize Zen | Fri Mar 03 1989 14:57 | 4 | 
|  | Well, not to disagree with Marge, but that's the directive I've heard recently
about hiring in CSCs - that you should hire from field service first.
BobW
 | 
| 736.4 | My parachute would be flame-colored!! | BAUCIS::WELCH |  | Fri Mar 03 1989 15:59 | 18 | 
|  | re: < Note 736.1 by SCARY::M_DAVIS "Coffee, please. Irregular." >
<
<    I haven't heard anything such as that.  I'd guess that if a certain
<    section of the company, say Manufacturing, were overstaffed and had
<    people looking for jobs, it would be rude to hire in someone from
<    another organization without looking at the "excess" folks in
<    Manufacturing first... but I've not heard of any directive.
<    
<    Marge
I hope we are not rejecting better qualified job applicants from other DEC
groups, who themselves may be 'excess' (and therefore just as entitled to 
preference), simply because it might be "rude" to hire them.
-KpW
 | 
| 736.5 | HEADCOUNT | JAWS::DIAZ | CMG/CDG/SAMG | Fri Mar 03 1989 16:33 | 10 | 
|  |     It all has to do with headcount.  Group managers are looking  closely
    at not increasing the headcount since they have been given very clear
    orders from the top, and I would venture  that  in  the  case a group
    decreases the headcount they probably can't increase it again.
    
    In the case the slot has a high priority  my  guess is that, in order
    not to increase hadcount in one organization, they have to  hire from
    within.
    
    Octavio
 | 
| 736.6 |  | SCARY::M_DAVIS | Coffee, please. Irregular. | Fri Mar 03 1989 16:45 | 10 | 
|  |     re .4:
    
    So far as I know, we in CSSE are not restricted as far as where we can
    look internally to hire... we have, however, been asked to get v.p.
    signature on external hires... 
    
    Marge
    
    p.s. Bob, the fact that I wasn't aware doesn't mean it doesn't exist!
    ;^)
 | 
| 736.7 | Mastery of patience leads to mastery of all | WHYVAX::SAVAGE | Neil @ Spit Brook | Mon Mar 06 1989 14:40 | 4 | 
|  |     My experience agrees with Octavio's description of the situation in .5.
    I did succeed in hiring outside my group (which is Corporate User
    Publications) but I had to have a convincing case and be patient
    while the powers deliberated. 
 |