| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 903.1 | See the release notes | WRKSYS::ERB |  | Fri May 16 1997 14:56 | 3 | 
|  |     This is all explained in the release notes that come with VMS.
    
    				-Stu-
 | 
| 903.2 | Thanks Stu but as always I want more. | KERNEL::TOYNTONA |  | Mon May 19 1997 12:15 | 14 | 
|  |     Re -1                                        
    
    I have checked the release notes and all it says is that the built in
    SCSI controller will be bumped to the last letter i.e. PKC if 2
    additional controllers are added. What I wanted to know is if you had
    say 1 SCSI controller in primary PCI slot, 1 SCSI controller in a
    secondary PCI slot and 1 SCSI controller in an EISA slot which would be
    PKA PKB and PKC, obviously the built in would be PKD. Also if you have
    2 SCSI controllers in primary PCI slots which gets the lower letter the
    one with the highest or lowest slot number.
    
    						All the best
    
    						Andy Toynton
 | 
| 903.3 | for example.. | WRKSYS::LAU |  | Tue May 20 1997 12:29 | 14 | 
|  |     The numbering/order of SCSI controllers (the on-board is always pka)
    is shown in the following example.  Assuming you have controlloers in
    both primary and secondary slots.
    
    pci-11	kzpaa		pkd
    pci-12	kzpba		pke
    pci-13	----
    pci-1	kzpaa		pkb
    pci-2	de500
    pci-3	kzpba		pkc
    
    Paul
    
                                  
 | 
| 903.4 | Re -1 Close but no coconut. | KERNEL::TOYNTONA |  | Thu May 29 1997 11:12 | 13 | 
|  |     Re -1
    
    This is obviously wrong as VMS always pushes the built in controller to
    the last letter ie PKC with 2 additional SCSI controllers installed.
    
    On that basis is the rest of the information correct or does VMS
    letter the SCSI channels starting with the highest PCI slot numbers and
    where do EISA and ISA controllers fit in lower or higher lettered than
    the PCI slots
    
    						All the best
    
    						Andy Toynton.
 |