| Title: | DBSTARS Conference |
| Moderator: | BROKE::BASTINE |
| Created: | Wed Feb 02 1994 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 791 |
| Total number of notes: | 1521 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 298.1 | What I have so far, more to come after research | CSCMA::BASTINE | Mon Dec 12 1994 08:33 | 37 | |
| 298.2 | More information | CSCMA::BASTINE | Mon Dec 12 1994 09:32 | 15 | |
| 298.3 | Pls review | BROKE::BITHER | Fri Mar 22 1996 12:50 | 50 | |
| 298.4 | More info to add to article | BROKE::BITHER | Fri Aug 09 1996 10:30 | 32 | |
| 298.5 | Performance | BROKE::BASTINE | Fri Jan 24 1997 09:38 | 4 | |
| 298.6 | More performance hints... | BROKE::BASTINE | Fri Jan 24 1997 09:55 | 105 | |
| 298.7 | My tests | BROKE::GREEN | Thu Jan 30 1997 10:34 | 12 | |
Renee,
My tests showed that setting a transaction to READ ONLY (versus READ
WRITE) does not change the performance of a query using the NSDS based
RMS gateway. I tested this with and without RMS Journaling and the
results were the same.
A long time ago I was told that READ ONLY would improve performance
because READ locks were less expensive. In a controlled environment
this made no difference at all in performance.
Don
| |||||